老年不能预测癌症患者疼痛管理不足:来自意大利放疗部门的多中心前瞻性分析(rise -研究)。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancers Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.3390/cancers17183073
Costanza M Donati, Erika Galietta, Francesco Cellini, Arina A Zamfir, Alessia Di Rito, Maurizio Portaluri, Anna Santacaterina, Filippo Mammini, Rossella Di Franco, Salvatore Parisi, Antonella Bianculli, Pierpaolo Ziccarelli, Luigi Ziccarelli, Domenico Genovesi, Luciana Caravatta, Francesco Deodato, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Fiorica, Silvia Cammelli, Milly Buwenge, Lucia Angelini, Romina Rossi, Marco C Maltoni, Nam P Nguyen, Alessio G Morganti, Savino Cilla
{"title":"老年不能预测癌症患者疼痛管理不足:来自意大利放疗部门的多中心前瞻性分析(rise -研究)。","authors":"Costanza M Donati, Erika Galietta, Francesco Cellini, Arina A Zamfir, Alessia Di Rito, Maurizio Portaluri, Anna Santacaterina, Filippo Mammini, Rossella Di Franco, Salvatore Parisi, Antonella Bianculli, Pierpaolo Ziccarelli, Luigi Ziccarelli, Domenico Genovesi, Luciana Caravatta, Francesco Deodato, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Fiorica, Silvia Cammelli, Milly Buwenge, Lucia Angelini, Romina Rossi, Marco C Maltoni, Nam P Nguyen, Alessio G Morganti, Savino Cilla","doi":"10.3390/cancers17183073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have often reported a link between advanced age and inadequate cancer pain management. Given Italy's demographic profile as the country with the oldest population in Europe, it offers an ideal setting to explore whether this association remains valid today.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed primarily to assess the influence of advanced age on the adequacy of pain management among patients receiving treatment in Italian radiotherapy (RT) departments, and secondarily, to identify age-specific determinants of analgesic undertreatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study, we enrolled 2104 consecutive patients attending 13 RT centers between October and November 2019. Pain intensity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and patients reporting scores ≥ 1 (<i>n</i> = 1353) were included in the analysis. Pain management adequacy was assessed using the Pain Management Index (PMI), with negative values indicating undertreatment. A two-step statistical approach was employed: variable selection via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression, followed by Classification and Regression Tree analysis to identify key predictors. Separate analyses were performed for the overall population, older adults (≥65 years), and younger adults (18-64 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 42% of patients were undertreated (PMI < 0), without significant differences between older (41.0%) and younger patients (43.1%). However, factors contributing to undertreatment varied according to age. For the entire cohort, non-cancer pain was associated with substantially higher rates of undertreatment (74.3%) compared to cancer-related pain (34.2%). Among cancer patients, those receiving curative RT had poorer pain control (49.4%) than those receiving palliative RT (28.8%). In older patients, geographic location strongly influenced pain management, with higher rates of undertreatment in central and southern Italy compared to the north (e.g., palliative RT: 64.0% vs. 15.4%, respectively). Conversely, younger patients showed no geographical differences; instead, timing of assessment (beginning vs. end of RT) influenced outcomes, with improved PMI values towards the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unlike previous studies, advanced age itself was not associated with inadequate analgesia. However, the determinants of inadequate pain management differed significantly by age: geographic disparities were predominant among older patients, while assessment timing influenced outcomes for younger patients. Further longitudinal research and targeted interventions are needed to address these age-dependent challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older Age Does Not Predict Inadequate Pain Management in Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Analysis from Italian Radiotherapy Departments (ARISE-Study).\",\"authors\":\"Costanza M Donati, Erika Galietta, Francesco Cellini, Arina A Zamfir, Alessia Di Rito, Maurizio Portaluri, Anna Santacaterina, Filippo Mammini, Rossella Di Franco, Salvatore Parisi, Antonella Bianculli, Pierpaolo Ziccarelli, Luigi Ziccarelli, Domenico Genovesi, Luciana Caravatta, Francesco Deodato, Gabriella Macchia, Francesco Fiorica, Silvia Cammelli, Milly Buwenge, Lucia Angelini, Romina Rossi, Marco C Maltoni, Nam P Nguyen, Alessio G Morganti, Savino Cilla\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17183073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have often reported a link between advanced age and inadequate cancer pain management. Given Italy's demographic profile as the country with the oldest population in Europe, it offers an ideal setting to explore whether this association remains valid today.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed primarily to assess the influence of advanced age on the adequacy of pain management among patients receiving treatment in Italian radiotherapy (RT) departments, and secondarily, to identify age-specific determinants of analgesic undertreatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study, we enrolled 2104 consecutive patients attending 13 RT centers between October and November 2019. Pain intensity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and patients reporting scores ≥ 1 (<i>n</i> = 1353) were included in the analysis. Pain management adequacy was assessed using the Pain Management Index (PMI), with negative values indicating undertreatment. A two-step statistical approach was employed: variable selection via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression, followed by Classification and Regression Tree analysis to identify key predictors. Separate analyses were performed for the overall population, older adults (≥65 years), and younger adults (18-64 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 42% of patients were undertreated (PMI < 0), without significant differences between older (41.0%) and younger patients (43.1%). However, factors contributing to undertreatment varied according to age. For the entire cohort, non-cancer pain was associated with substantially higher rates of undertreatment (74.3%) compared to cancer-related pain (34.2%). Among cancer patients, those receiving curative RT had poorer pain control (49.4%) than those receiving palliative RT (28.8%). In older patients, geographic location strongly influenced pain management, with higher rates of undertreatment in central and southern Italy compared to the north (e.g., palliative RT: 64.0% vs. 15.4%, respectively). Conversely, younger patients showed no geographical differences; instead, timing of assessment (beginning vs. end of RT) influenced outcomes, with improved PMI values towards the end of treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unlike previous studies, advanced age itself was not associated with inadequate analgesia. However, the determinants of inadequate pain management differed significantly by age: geographic disparities were predominant among older patients, while assessment timing influenced outcomes for younger patients. Further longitudinal research and targeted interventions are needed to address these age-dependent challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469011/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183073\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以前的研究经常报道老年和不适当的癌症疼痛管理之间的联系。考虑到意大利是欧洲人口老龄化最严重的国家,它提供了一个理想的环境来探索这种联系今天是否仍然有效。目的:本研究的主要目的是评估高龄对意大利放疗(RT)部门接受治疗的患者疼痛管理充分性的影响,其次是确定止痛治疗不足的年龄特异性决定因素。方法:在这项前瞻性多中心研究中,我们在2019年10月至11月期间在13个RT中心连续招募了2104名患者。疼痛强度采用数字评定量表(NRS)进行评估,报告得分≥1的患者(n = 1353)被纳入分析。使用疼痛管理指数(PMI)评估疼痛管理的充分性,负值表示治疗不足。采用两步统计方法:通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归选择变量,然后通过分类和回归树分析确定关键预测因子。对总体人群、老年人(≥65岁)和年轻人(18-64岁)进行单独分析。结果:总体而言,42%的患者治疗不足(PMI < 0),老年患者(41.0%)和年轻患者(43.1%)之间无显著差异。然而,导致治疗不足的因素因年龄而异。在整个队列中,与癌症相关的疼痛(34.2%)相比,非癌症性疼痛的治疗不足率(74.3%)要高得多。在癌症患者中,接受治疗性放疗的患者疼痛控制较差(49.4%),而接受姑息性放疗的患者疼痛控制较差(28.8%)。在老年患者中,地理位置强烈影响疼痛管理,意大利中部和南部的治疗不足率高于北部(例如,姑息性放疗:分别为64.0%和15.4%)。相反,年轻患者没有表现出地域差异;相反,评估的时间(RT的开始和结束)影响结果,在治疗结束时PMI值有所改善。结论:与以往的研究不同,高龄本身与镇痛不足无关。然而,疼痛管理不当的决定因素因年龄而有显著差异:老年患者的地理差异占主导地位,而年轻患者的评估时间影响结果。需要进一步的纵向研究和有针对性的干预措施来解决这些与年龄相关的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Older Age Does Not Predict Inadequate Pain Management in Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Prospective Analysis from Italian Radiotherapy Departments (ARISE-Study).

Background: Previous studies have often reported a link between advanced age and inadequate cancer pain management. Given Italy's demographic profile as the country with the oldest population in Europe, it offers an ideal setting to explore whether this association remains valid today.

Aim: This study aimed primarily to assess the influence of advanced age on the adequacy of pain management among patients receiving treatment in Italian radiotherapy (RT) departments, and secondarily, to identify age-specific determinants of analgesic undertreatment.

Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study, we enrolled 2104 consecutive patients attending 13 RT centers between October and November 2019. Pain intensity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and patients reporting scores ≥ 1 (n = 1353) were included in the analysis. Pain management adequacy was assessed using the Pain Management Index (PMI), with negative values indicating undertreatment. A two-step statistical approach was employed: variable selection via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression, followed by Classification and Regression Tree analysis to identify key predictors. Separate analyses were performed for the overall population, older adults (≥65 years), and younger adults (18-64 years).

Results: Overall, 42% of patients were undertreated (PMI < 0), without significant differences between older (41.0%) and younger patients (43.1%). However, factors contributing to undertreatment varied according to age. For the entire cohort, non-cancer pain was associated with substantially higher rates of undertreatment (74.3%) compared to cancer-related pain (34.2%). Among cancer patients, those receiving curative RT had poorer pain control (49.4%) than those receiving palliative RT (28.8%). In older patients, geographic location strongly influenced pain management, with higher rates of undertreatment in central and southern Italy compared to the north (e.g., palliative RT: 64.0% vs. 15.4%, respectively). Conversely, younger patients showed no geographical differences; instead, timing of assessment (beginning vs. end of RT) influenced outcomes, with improved PMI values towards the end of treatment.

Conclusions: Unlike previous studies, advanced age itself was not associated with inadequate analgesia. However, the determinants of inadequate pain management differed significantly by age: geographic disparities were predominant among older patients, while assessment timing influenced outcomes for younger patients. Further longitudinal research and targeted interventions are needed to address these age-dependent challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancers
Cancers Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
9.60%
发文量
5371
审稿时长
18.07 days
期刊介绍: Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信