纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值对判断附件肿块患者恶性肿瘤的诊断价值:一项方法学研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gözde Şahin, Ayşe HazırBulan, Hatice Argun Atalmış, İlkbal Temel Yüksel, Işık Sözen, Alper Koçbıyık, Nilüfer Çetinkaya Kocadal, İsmet Alkış
{"title":"纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值对判断附件肿块患者恶性肿瘤的诊断价值:一项方法学研究。","authors":"Gözde Şahin, Ayşe HazırBulan, Hatice Argun Atalmış, İlkbal Temel Yüksel, Işık Sözen, Alper Koçbıyık, Nilüfer Çetinkaya Kocadal, İsmet Alkış","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15182372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Adnexal masses are common in women across different age and hormonal states: pregnancy, premenopause, and postmenopause. Ovarian carcinoma, a malignancy arising in the adnexa, poses significant health risks. While malignancy risk increases with age and postmenopausal status, current methods for stratifying borderline cases remain inadequate, potentially leading to over- or undertreatment that may affect fertility or survival. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study was conducted with 318 adult women who were diagnosed with adnexal masses and underwent surgery at a university hospital between 2020 and November 2023. Patient data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical record system. Routinely measured preoperative serologic parameters-carbohydrate antigen (CA)125, CA19-9, CA15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) levels-were analyzed alongside final histopathological results. No procedures outside routine clinical practice were performed. Diagnostic performance of each marker was evaluated using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. <b>Results:</b> A total of 318 patients with adnexal masses were analyzed. The FAR levels were significantly elevated in malignant compared to borderline and benign groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and FAR alone showed 47% sensitivity and 91% specificity for borderline tumors, whereas CA125 showed 70% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Multivariate models combining FAR, CA125, and CA15-3 achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with superior AUCs compared to single biomarkers. <b>Conclusions</b>: FAR is a simple, accessible inflammatory marker that complements CA125 by enhancing specificity. Combination of multiple markers with the highest sensitivity and specificity, together with FAR, may reduce the risk of both false negatives, offering a more balanced and accurate diagnostic tool for preoperative stratification of borderline tumor cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469132/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Power of the Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio for Estimating Malignancy in Patients with Adnexal Masses: A Methodological Study.\",\"authors\":\"Gözde Şahin, Ayşe HazırBulan, Hatice Argun Atalmış, İlkbal Temel Yüksel, Işık Sözen, Alper Koçbıyık, Nilüfer Çetinkaya Kocadal, İsmet Alkış\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15182372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Adnexal masses are common in women across different age and hormonal states: pregnancy, premenopause, and postmenopause. Ovarian carcinoma, a malignancy arising in the adnexa, poses significant health risks. While malignancy risk increases with age and postmenopausal status, current methods for stratifying borderline cases remain inadequate, potentially leading to over- or undertreatment that may affect fertility or survival. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective study was conducted with 318 adult women who were diagnosed with adnexal masses and underwent surgery at a university hospital between 2020 and November 2023. Patient data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical record system. Routinely measured preoperative serologic parameters-carbohydrate antigen (CA)125, CA19-9, CA15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) levels-were analyzed alongside final histopathological results. No procedures outside routine clinical practice were performed. Diagnostic performance of each marker was evaluated using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. <b>Results:</b> A total of 318 patients with adnexal masses were analyzed. The FAR levels were significantly elevated in malignant compared to borderline and benign groups (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and FAR alone showed 47% sensitivity and 91% specificity for borderline tumors, whereas CA125 showed 70% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Multivariate models combining FAR, CA125, and CA15-3 achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with superior AUCs compared to single biomarkers. <b>Conclusions</b>: FAR is a simple, accessible inflammatory marker that complements CA125 by enhancing specificity. Combination of multiple markers with the highest sensitivity and specificity, together with FAR, may reduce the risk of both false negatives, offering a more balanced and accurate diagnostic tool for preoperative stratification of borderline tumor cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469132/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182372\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:附件肿块常见于不同年龄和激素状态的女性:怀孕、绝经前和绝经后。卵巢癌是一种发生在附件的恶性肿瘤,对健康构成重大威胁。虽然恶性肿瘤风险随着年龄和绝经后状态的增加而增加,但目前对边缘病例进行分层的方法仍然不充分,可能导致治疗过度或治疗不足,从而影响生育或生存。方法:本回顾性研究对2020年至2023年11月在某大学医院诊断为附件肿块并接受手术的318名成年女性进行了研究。从医院的电子病历系统中检索患者数据。常规测定术前血清学参数——碳水化合物抗原(CA)125、CA19-9、CA15-3、癌胚抗原(CEA)、甲胎蛋白(AFP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比(FAR)水平——与最终组织病理学结果一起分析。没有常规临床实践以外的程序。采用受试者工作曲线(receiver operating curve, ROC)分析评价各指标的诊断效果。结果:共分析了318例附件肿物。与交界性和良性肿瘤组相比,FAR在恶性肿瘤中的水平显著升高(p < 0.001),并且FAR单独对交界性肿瘤的敏感性为47%,特异性为91%,而CA125的敏感性为70%,特异性为85%。结合FAR、CA125和CA15-3的多变量模型获得了最高的诊断准确性,与单一生物标志物相比具有更高的auc。结论:FAR是一种简单、可及的炎症标志物,通过增强特异性来补充CA125。将灵敏度和特异性最高的多个标志物与FAR联合使用,可降低两种假阴性的风险,为交界性肿瘤病例的术前分层提供更平衡、更准确的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Power of the Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio for Estimating Malignancy in Patients with Adnexal Masses: A Methodological Study.

Background: Adnexal masses are common in women across different age and hormonal states: pregnancy, premenopause, and postmenopause. Ovarian carcinoma, a malignancy arising in the adnexa, poses significant health risks. While malignancy risk increases with age and postmenopausal status, current methods for stratifying borderline cases remain inadequate, potentially leading to over- or undertreatment that may affect fertility or survival. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted with 318 adult women who were diagnosed with adnexal masses and underwent surgery at a university hospital between 2020 and November 2023. Patient data were retrieved from the hospital's electronic medical record system. Routinely measured preoperative serologic parameters-carbohydrate antigen (CA)125, CA19-9, CA15-3, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR) levels-were analyzed alongside final histopathological results. No procedures outside routine clinical practice were performed. Diagnostic performance of each marker was evaluated using receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis. Results: A total of 318 patients with adnexal masses were analyzed. The FAR levels were significantly elevated in malignant compared to borderline and benign groups (p < 0.001), and FAR alone showed 47% sensitivity and 91% specificity for borderline tumors, whereas CA125 showed 70% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Multivariate models combining FAR, CA125, and CA15-3 achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy, with superior AUCs compared to single biomarkers. Conclusions: FAR is a simple, accessible inflammatory marker that complements CA125 by enhancing specificity. Combination of multiple markers with the highest sensitivity and specificity, together with FAR, may reduce the risk of both false negatives, offering a more balanced and accurate diagnostic tool for preoperative stratification of borderline tumor cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信