MRI放射组学预测弥漫性腱鞘巨细胞瘤的探索性研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Seul Ki Lee, Min Wook Joo, Jee-Young Kim, Mingeon Kim
{"title":"MRI放射组学预测弥漫性腱鞘巨细胞瘤的探索性研究。","authors":"Seul Ki Lee, Min Wook Joo, Jee-Young Kim, Mingeon Kim","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15182399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate a radiomics-based MRI model for prediction of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT), which has higher postoperative recurrence and more aggressive behavior than localized-type (L-TGCT). The study was conducted under the hypothesis that MRI-based radiomics models can predict D-TGCT with diagnostic performance significantly greater than chance level, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) (null hypothesis: AUC ≤ 0.5; alternative hypothesis: AUC > 0.5). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 84 patients with histologically confirmed TGCT (54 L-TGCT, 30 D-TGCT) who underwent preoperative MRI between January 2005 and December 2024. Tumor segmentation was manually performed on T2-weighted (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. After standardized preprocessing, 1691 radiomic features were extracted, and feature selection was performed using minimum redundancy maximum relevance. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) classifiers were developed using a training cohort (<i>n</i> = 52) and tested in an independent test cohort (<i>n</i> = 32). Model performance was assessed AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. <b>Results:</b> In the training set, D-TGCT prevalence was 32.6%; in the test set, it was 40.6%. The MLR model used three T2WI features: wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformity, wavelet-HLL_gldm_LowGrayLevelEmphasis, and square_firstorder_Median. Training performance was high (AUC 0.94; sensitivity 75.0%; specificity 90.9%; accuracy 85.7%) but dropped in testing (AUC 0.60; sensitivity 62.5%; specificity 60.6%; accuracy 61.2%). The RF classifier demonstrated more stable performance [(training) AUC 0.85; sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 87.9%; accuracy 73.5% and (test) AUC 0.73; sensitivity 56.2%; specificity 72.7%; accuracy 67.3%]. <b>Conclusions:</b> Radiomics-based MRI models may help predict D-TGCT. While the MLR model overfitted, the RF classifier demonstrated relatively greater robustness and generalizability, suggesting that it may support clinical decision-making for D-TGCT in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI Radiomics for Predicting the Diffuse Type of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: An Exploratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Seul Ki Lee, Min Wook Joo, Jee-Young Kim, Mingeon Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15182399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To develop and validate a radiomics-based MRI model for prediction of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT), which has higher postoperative recurrence and more aggressive behavior than localized-type (L-TGCT). The study was conducted under the hypothesis that MRI-based radiomics models can predict D-TGCT with diagnostic performance significantly greater than chance level, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) (null hypothesis: AUC ≤ 0.5; alternative hypothesis: AUC > 0.5). <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This retrospective study included 84 patients with histologically confirmed TGCT (54 L-TGCT, 30 D-TGCT) who underwent preoperative MRI between January 2005 and December 2024. Tumor segmentation was manually performed on T2-weighted (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. After standardized preprocessing, 1691 radiomic features were extracted, and feature selection was performed using minimum redundancy maximum relevance. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) classifiers were developed using a training cohort (<i>n</i> = 52) and tested in an independent test cohort (<i>n</i> = 32). Model performance was assessed AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. <b>Results:</b> In the training set, D-TGCT prevalence was 32.6%; in the test set, it was 40.6%. The MLR model used three T2WI features: wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformity, wavelet-HLL_gldm_LowGrayLevelEmphasis, and square_firstorder_Median. Training performance was high (AUC 0.94; sensitivity 75.0%; specificity 90.9%; accuracy 85.7%) but dropped in testing (AUC 0.60; sensitivity 62.5%; specificity 60.6%; accuracy 61.2%). The RF classifier demonstrated more stable performance [(training) AUC 0.85; sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 87.9%; accuracy 73.5% and (test) AUC 0.73; sensitivity 56.2%; specificity 72.7%; accuracy 67.3%]. <b>Conclusions:</b> Radiomics-based MRI models may help predict D-TGCT. While the MLR model overfitted, the RF classifier demonstrated relatively greater robustness and generalizability, suggesting that it may support clinical decision-making for D-TGCT in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182399\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182399","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立并验证基于放射组学的弥漫性腱鞘巨细胞瘤(D-TGCT)的MRI预测模型。D-TGCT术后比局限性巨细胞瘤(L-TGCT)具有更高的复发率和更强的侵袭性行为。本研究假设基于mri的放射组学模型预测D-TGCT的诊断效能显著大于机会水平,以受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)衡量(零假设:AUC≤0.5;备选假设:AUC > 0.5)。材料与方法:本回顾性研究纳入84例经组织学证实的TGCT患者,其中54例为L-TGCT, 30例为D-TGCT,于2005年1月至2024年12月行术前MRI检查。人工对T2WI和增强的t1加权图像进行肿瘤分割。经过标准化预处理,提取了1691个放射学特征,采用最小冗余、最大关联的方法进行特征选择。使用训练队列(n = 52)开发多元逻辑回归(MLR)和随机森林(RF)分类器,并在独立测试队列(n = 32)中进行测试。评估模型的AUC、敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果:训练集中D-TGCT患病率为32.6%;在测试集中,它是40.6%。MLR模型使用了三个T2WI特征:wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformity、wavelet-HLL_gldm_LowGrayLevelEmphasis和square_firstder_median。训练成绩高(AUC 0.94,敏感性75.0%,特异性90.9%,准确性85.7%),但测试成绩下降(AUC 0.60,敏感性62.5%,特异性60.6%,准确性61.2%)。RF分类器表现出更稳定的性能[(训练)AUC 0.85;灵敏度43.8%;特异性87.9%;准确度73.5%,(试验)AUC 0.73;灵敏度56.2%;特异性72.7%;精度67.3%]。结论:基于放射组学的MRI模型可能有助于预测D-TGCT。虽然MLR模型过拟合,但RF分类器表现出相对更强的鲁棒性和泛化性,这表明它可能在未来支持D-TGCT的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MRI Radiomics for Predicting the Diffuse Type of Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor: An Exploratory Study.

Objective: To develop and validate a radiomics-based MRI model for prediction of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT), which has higher postoperative recurrence and more aggressive behavior than localized-type (L-TGCT). The study was conducted under the hypothesis that MRI-based radiomics models can predict D-TGCT with diagnostic performance significantly greater than chance level, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) (null hypothesis: AUC ≤ 0.5; alternative hypothesis: AUC > 0.5). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 84 patients with histologically confirmed TGCT (54 L-TGCT, 30 D-TGCT) who underwent preoperative MRI between January 2005 and December 2024. Tumor segmentation was manually performed on T2-weighted (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. After standardized preprocessing, 1691 radiomic features were extracted, and feature selection was performed using minimum redundancy maximum relevance. Multivariate logistic regression (MLR) and random forest (RF) classifiers were developed using a training cohort (n = 52) and tested in an independent test cohort (n = 32). Model performance was assessed AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: In the training set, D-TGCT prevalence was 32.6%; in the test set, it was 40.6%. The MLR model used three T2WI features: wavelet-LHL_glszm_GrayLevelNonUniformity, wavelet-HLL_gldm_LowGrayLevelEmphasis, and square_firstorder_Median. Training performance was high (AUC 0.94; sensitivity 75.0%; specificity 90.9%; accuracy 85.7%) but dropped in testing (AUC 0.60; sensitivity 62.5%; specificity 60.6%; accuracy 61.2%). The RF classifier demonstrated more stable performance [(training) AUC 0.85; sensitivity 43.8%; specificity 87.9%; accuracy 73.5% and (test) AUC 0.73; sensitivity 56.2%; specificity 72.7%; accuracy 67.3%]. Conclusions: Radiomics-based MRI models may help predict D-TGCT. While the MLR model overfitted, the RF classifier demonstrated relatively greater robustness and generalizability, suggesting that it may support clinical decision-making for D-TGCT in the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信