基于深度学习的碘造影剂增强在次优增强CT肺血管造影中的应用:对肺栓塞诊断的意义。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kyungsoo Bae, Tae Hoon Kim, Kyung Nyeo Jeon
{"title":"基于深度学习的碘造影剂增强在次优增强CT肺血管造影中的应用:对肺栓塞诊断的意义。","authors":"Kyungsoo Bae, Tae Hoon Kim, Kyung Nyeo Jeon","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15182325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to assess the impact of a deep learning-based iodine contrast augmentation (DLCA) algorithm on image quality and diagnostic performance for pulmonary embolism (PE) detection in suboptimally enhanced CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively included 103 suboptimal CTPA cases performed between May 2020 and March 2025. Image quality (attenuation, noise, SNR, and CNR) was compared between original and DLCA-processed images. Diagnostic performance for PE detection was assessed per segment, with and without DLCA processing. <b>Results</b>: DLCA increased pulmonary artery opacification by 57.7% and reduced noise by 56.7%, significantly improving SNR (13.2 → 47.5) and CNR (8.7 → 37.2; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Incorporation of DLCA-processed images improved diagnostic accuracy for overall (AUC: 0.874/0.845 → 0.958/0.938), central (0.939/0.895 → 0.987/0.972), and peripheral (0.824/0.807 → 0.935/0.912) PE detection (all <i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). In suboptimal CTPA, a pulmonary artery attenuation threshold of 130 HU was identified, above which DLCA processing significantly improved PE detection accuracy compared with original images in both readers (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: DLCA processing in suboptimal CTPA significantly enhances image quality and diagnostic accuracy for PE detection, providing a promising strategy to optimize scans without additional contrast or radiation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-Based Iodine Contrast Augmentation for Suboptimally Enhanced CT Pulmonary Angiography: Implications for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.\",\"authors\":\"Kyungsoo Bae, Tae Hoon Kim, Kyung Nyeo Jeon\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15182325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: This study aimed to assess the impact of a deep learning-based iodine contrast augmentation (DLCA) algorithm on image quality and diagnostic performance for pulmonary embolism (PE) detection in suboptimally enhanced CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively included 103 suboptimal CTPA cases performed between May 2020 and March 2025. Image quality (attenuation, noise, SNR, and CNR) was compared between original and DLCA-processed images. Diagnostic performance for PE detection was assessed per segment, with and without DLCA processing. <b>Results</b>: DLCA increased pulmonary artery opacification by 57.7% and reduced noise by 56.7%, significantly improving SNR (13.2 → 47.5) and CNR (8.7 → 37.2; both <i>p</i> < 0.001). Incorporation of DLCA-processed images improved diagnostic accuracy for overall (AUC: 0.874/0.845 → 0.958/0.938), central (0.939/0.895 → 0.987/0.972), and peripheral (0.824/0.807 → 0.935/0.912) PE detection (all <i>p</i> ≤ 0.003). In suboptimal CTPA, a pulmonary artery attenuation threshold of 130 HU was identified, above which DLCA processing significantly improved PE detection accuracy compared with original images in both readers (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: DLCA processing in suboptimal CTPA significantly enhances image quality and diagnostic accuracy for PE detection, providing a promising strategy to optimize scans without additional contrast or radiation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468925/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182325\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182325","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在评估基于深度学习的碘对比增强(DLCA)算法对次优增强CT肺血管造影(CTPA)中肺栓塞(PE)检测的图像质量和诊断性能的影响。方法:我们回顾性地纳入了2020年5月至2025年3月间进行的103例次优CTPA病例。比较原始图像和dlca处理图像的图像质量(衰减、噪声、信噪比和CNR)。每个节段评估PE检测的诊断性能,有无DLCA处理。结果:DLCA增加了57.7%的肺动脉混浊,降低了56.7%的噪声,显著提高了信噪比(13.2→47.5)和CNR(8.7→37.2,p均< 0.001)。合并dlca处理的图像提高了整体(AUC: 0.874/0.845→0.958/0.938)、中心(0.939/0.895→0.987/0.972)和外周(0.824/0.807→0.935/0.912)PE检测的诊断准确率(均p≤0.003)。在次优CTPA中,肺动脉衰减阈值为130 HU,与原始图像相比,DLCA处理显著提高了两个阅读器的PE检测精度(p < 0.001)。结论:次优CTPA的DLCA处理显著提高了图像质量和PE检测的诊断准确性,为优化扫描提供了有前途的策略,无需额外的对比度或辐射。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning-Based Iodine Contrast Augmentation for Suboptimally Enhanced CT Pulmonary Angiography: Implications for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis.

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess the impact of a deep learning-based iodine contrast augmentation (DLCA) algorithm on image quality and diagnostic performance for pulmonary embolism (PE) detection in suboptimally enhanced CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA). Methods: We retrospectively included 103 suboptimal CTPA cases performed between May 2020 and March 2025. Image quality (attenuation, noise, SNR, and CNR) was compared between original and DLCA-processed images. Diagnostic performance for PE detection was assessed per segment, with and without DLCA processing. Results: DLCA increased pulmonary artery opacification by 57.7% and reduced noise by 56.7%, significantly improving SNR (13.2 → 47.5) and CNR (8.7 → 37.2; both p < 0.001). Incorporation of DLCA-processed images improved diagnostic accuracy for overall (AUC: 0.874/0.845 → 0.958/0.938), central (0.939/0.895 → 0.987/0.972), and peripheral (0.824/0.807 → 0.935/0.912) PE detection (all p ≤ 0.003). In suboptimal CTPA, a pulmonary artery attenuation threshold of 130 HU was identified, above which DLCA processing significantly improved PE detection accuracy compared with original images in both readers (p < 0.001). Conclusions: DLCA processing in suboptimal CTPA significantly enhances image quality and diagnostic accuracy for PE detection, providing a promising strategy to optimize scans without additional contrast or radiation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信