Aman Chauhan, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Namrata Vijayvergia
{"title":"高级2/3级GEP-NET治疗的测序选择和实际临床管理:PRRT的新作用。","authors":"Aman Chauhan, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Namrata Vijayvergia","doi":"10.3390/cancers17183008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prognosis of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is highly variable and reported median overall survival remains low. There is no established standard of care for patients with higher grade 2 (G2) (Ki-67 ≥ 10% and ≤ 20%) and grade 3 (G3) (Ki-67 ≥ 20% and ≤ 55%) GEP-NETs and most of the current treatment regimens, particularly for G3 NETs, are extrapolated from lower-grade GEP-NET treatments or based on data from small retrospective studies. Robust evidence to support treatment recommendations for high-grade NETs, especially in the first-line (1L) setting, is limited and the optimal treatment sequence has not been clearly defined. This review summarizes the latest literature on sequencing of therapies, identifies patient selection considerations for utilizing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and offers data-driven expert opinions and clinical practice recommendations in high-grade GEP-NETs. As authors, we recommend that all patients with well-differentiated, higher G2 and G3 NETs are evaluated with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide positron emission tomography (PET) for baseline somatostatin receptor expression and if positive, a 1L treatment option of PRRT should be considered, especially in clinically stable patients. Somatostatin analog therapy may benefit patients with low-volume, indolent disease, and chemotherapy is usually a better fit for patients in visceral crisis, in need of urgent treatment, or with no access to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET. In complex cases, a robust discussion at a multidisciplinary NET tumor board can be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468650/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequencing Choices and Real-World Clinical Management in Advanced Grade 2/3 GEP-NET Treatment: The Emerging Role of PRRT.\",\"authors\":\"Aman Chauhan, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson, Namrata Vijayvergia\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17183008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prognosis of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is highly variable and reported median overall survival remains low. There is no established standard of care for patients with higher grade 2 (G2) (Ki-67 ≥ 10% and ≤ 20%) and grade 3 (G3) (Ki-67 ≥ 20% and ≤ 55%) GEP-NETs and most of the current treatment regimens, particularly for G3 NETs, are extrapolated from lower-grade GEP-NET treatments or based on data from small retrospective studies. Robust evidence to support treatment recommendations for high-grade NETs, especially in the first-line (1L) setting, is limited and the optimal treatment sequence has not been clearly defined. This review summarizes the latest literature on sequencing of therapies, identifies patient selection considerations for utilizing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and offers data-driven expert opinions and clinical practice recommendations in high-grade GEP-NETs. As authors, we recommend that all patients with well-differentiated, higher G2 and G3 NETs are evaluated with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide positron emission tomography (PET) for baseline somatostatin receptor expression and if positive, a 1L treatment option of PRRT should be considered, especially in clinically stable patients. Somatostatin analog therapy may benefit patients with low-volume, indolent disease, and chemotherapy is usually a better fit for patients in visceral crisis, in need of urgent treatment, or with no access to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET. In complex cases, a robust discussion at a multidisciplinary NET tumor board can be beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468650/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17183008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高级别胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NETs)的预后变化很大,报道的中位总生存期仍然很低。对于较高2级(G2) (Ki-67≥10%和≤20%)和3级(G3) (Ki-67≥20%和≤55%)的GEP-NETs患者,没有既定的护理标准,目前大多数治疗方案,特别是G3 NETs,都是从较低级别GEP-NET治疗中推断出来的,或者是基于小型回顾性研究的数据。支持高级别NETs治疗建议的有力证据,特别是在一线(1L)环境中,是有限的,最佳治疗顺序尚未明确定义。这篇综述总结了关于治疗测序的最新文献,确定了使用肽受体放射性核素治疗(PRRT)的患者选择考虑因素,并提供了数据驱动的专家意见和高级别GEP-NETs的临床实践建议。作为作者,我们建议所有分化良好、G2和G3 NETs较高的患者采用[68Ga] ga - dota肽正电子发射断层扫描(PET)评估生长抑素受体的基线表达,如果呈阳性,应考虑1L PRRT治疗方案,尤其是临床稳定的患者。生长抑素类似物治疗可能有利于小容量、惰性疾病的患者,化疗通常更适合于脏器危象、需要紧急治疗或无法获得[68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET的患者。在复杂的病例中,在多学科NET肿瘤委员会上进行强有力的讨论可能是有益的。
Sequencing Choices and Real-World Clinical Management in Advanced Grade 2/3 GEP-NET Treatment: The Emerging Role of PRRT.
The prognosis of high-grade gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) is highly variable and reported median overall survival remains low. There is no established standard of care for patients with higher grade 2 (G2) (Ki-67 ≥ 10% and ≤ 20%) and grade 3 (G3) (Ki-67 ≥ 20% and ≤ 55%) GEP-NETs and most of the current treatment regimens, particularly for G3 NETs, are extrapolated from lower-grade GEP-NET treatments or based on data from small retrospective studies. Robust evidence to support treatment recommendations for high-grade NETs, especially in the first-line (1L) setting, is limited and the optimal treatment sequence has not been clearly defined. This review summarizes the latest literature on sequencing of therapies, identifies patient selection considerations for utilizing peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), and offers data-driven expert opinions and clinical practice recommendations in high-grade GEP-NETs. As authors, we recommend that all patients with well-differentiated, higher G2 and G3 NETs are evaluated with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide positron emission tomography (PET) for baseline somatostatin receptor expression and if positive, a 1L treatment option of PRRT should be considered, especially in clinically stable patients. Somatostatin analog therapy may benefit patients with low-volume, indolent disease, and chemotherapy is usually a better fit for patients in visceral crisis, in need of urgent treatment, or with no access to [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET. In complex cases, a robust discussion at a multidisciplinary NET tumor board can be beneficial.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.