远程医疗干预对肾衰竭患者姑息治疗的有效性:一项系统综述。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Manudi Vidanapathirana, Malmee Dharmawardhane, Ruwanthi Ananda, Deshan Gomez, Pasyodun Koralage Buddhika Mahesh
{"title":"远程医疗干预对肾衰竭患者姑息治疗的有效性:一项系统综述。","authors":"Manudi Vidanapathirana, Malmee Dharmawardhane, Ruwanthi Ananda, Deshan Gomez, Pasyodun Koralage Buddhika Mahesh","doi":"10.1186/s12882-025-04463-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney failure affects a substantial proportion of the global population, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. These patients require high-quality palliative care to manage symptoms and enhance quality of life. With advances in technology, telehealth offers potentially convenient and scalable means to provide this integral aspect of care. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for providing palliative care in patients with kidney failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed (32), Cochrane (1), Google Scholar (938) and HINARI (25) yielded 1039 articles. Following the removal of duplicates, 1013 articles remained. Screening questions were developed in relation to the use of telehealth-based interventions among patients with kidney failure for palliative care. Studies on patients with stages 1-4 of chronic kidney disease, telehealth interventions related to improving renal replacement therapy, interventions focused on optimization of medical complications or drug adherence and caregiver-directed interventions were excluded. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers, with conflicts settled by a third. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis was not performed following heterogeneity assessments. Registration was done in PROSPERO registry with the ID CRD42024582255.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs were included in the final review. Two had low risk of bias while the other two had moderate risk. Three of the interventions were nurse-led telehealth interventions that focused on post-discharge follow up with outcomes related to quality of life and symptom control. The other focused on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered via telehealth. All post-discharge follow-up telehealth interventions showed significant improvements in symptom control and quality of life. The CBT intervention also demonstrated significant improvement in symptom control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth interventions for provision of palliative care in patients with kidney failure seem promising for improvement of symptom control and quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":9089,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nephrology","volume":"26 1","pages":"529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of telehealth interventions for palliative care in patients with kidney failure: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Manudi Vidanapathirana, Malmee Dharmawardhane, Ruwanthi Ananda, Deshan Gomez, Pasyodun Koralage Buddhika Mahesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12882-025-04463-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney failure affects a substantial proportion of the global population, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. These patients require high-quality palliative care to manage symptoms and enhance quality of life. With advances in technology, telehealth offers potentially convenient and scalable means to provide this integral aspect of care. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for providing palliative care in patients with kidney failure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed (32), Cochrane (1), Google Scholar (938) and HINARI (25) yielded 1039 articles. Following the removal of duplicates, 1013 articles remained. Screening questions were developed in relation to the use of telehealth-based interventions among patients with kidney failure for palliative care. Studies on patients with stages 1-4 of chronic kidney disease, telehealth interventions related to improving renal replacement therapy, interventions focused on optimization of medical complications or drug adherence and caregiver-directed interventions were excluded. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers, with conflicts settled by a third. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis was not performed following heterogeneity assessments. Registration was done in PROSPERO registry with the ID CRD42024582255.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four RCTs were included in the final review. Two had low risk of bias while the other two had moderate risk. Three of the interventions were nurse-led telehealth interventions that focused on post-discharge follow up with outcomes related to quality of life and symptom control. The other focused on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered via telehealth. All post-discharge follow-up telehealth interventions showed significant improvements in symptom control and quality of life. The CBT intervention also demonstrated significant improvement in symptom control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth interventions for provision of palliative care in patients with kidney failure seem promising for improvement of symptom control and quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04463-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-025-04463-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾衰竭影响了全球相当大比例的人口,并与高发病率和死亡率相关。这些患者需要高质量的姑息治疗来控制症状和提高生活质量。随着技术的进步,远程医疗提供了潜在的方便和可扩展的手段来提供护理的这一整体方面。本系统综述评估了远程医疗干预为肾衰竭患者提供姑息治疗的有效性。方法:综合检索PubMed(32)、Cochrane(1)、b谷歌Scholar(938)和HINARI(25)共1039篇论文。在删除重复物品后,还剩下1013件物品。针对在肾衰竭患者中使用基于远程保健的干预措施进行姑息治疗,制定了筛查问题。排除了对1-4期慢性肾病患者的研究、与改善肾脏替代疗法相关的远程保健干预、侧重于优化医疗并发症或药物依从性的干预以及护理人员指导的干预。文章由两名独立审稿人筛选,冲突由第三名审稿人解决。使用随机对照试验(rct)的RoB2工具评估偏倚风险。异质性评估后未进行meta分析。注册在PROSPERO注册中心完成,ID为CRD42024582255。结果:最终综述纳入4项rct。其中两名有低偏倚风险,另外两名有中等偏倚风险。其中三项干预措施是护士主导的远程保健干预措施,重点是出院后随访与生活质量和症状控制相关的结果。另一项研究侧重于通过远程医疗提供的认知行为疗法(CBT)。所有出院后随访远程保健干预均显示症状控制和生活质量显著改善。CBT干预在症状控制方面也有显著改善。结论:远程医疗干预为肾衰竭患者提供姑息治疗似乎有望改善症状控制和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of telehealth interventions for palliative care in patients with kidney failure: a systematic review.

Background: Kidney failure affects a substantial proportion of the global population, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. These patients require high-quality palliative care to manage symptoms and enhance quality of life. With advances in technology, telehealth offers potentially convenient and scalable means to provide this integral aspect of care. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness of telehealth interventions for providing palliative care in patients with kidney failure.

Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed (32), Cochrane (1), Google Scholar (938) and HINARI (25) yielded 1039 articles. Following the removal of duplicates, 1013 articles remained. Screening questions were developed in relation to the use of telehealth-based interventions among patients with kidney failure for palliative care. Studies on patients with stages 1-4 of chronic kidney disease, telehealth interventions related to improving renal replacement therapy, interventions focused on optimization of medical complications or drug adherence and caregiver-directed interventions were excluded. Articles were screened by two independent reviewers, with conflicts settled by a third. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB2 tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis was not performed following heterogeneity assessments. Registration was done in PROSPERO registry with the ID CRD42024582255.

Results: Four RCTs were included in the final review. Two had low risk of bias while the other two had moderate risk. Three of the interventions were nurse-led telehealth interventions that focused on post-discharge follow up with outcomes related to quality of life and symptom control. The other focused on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered via telehealth. All post-discharge follow-up telehealth interventions showed significant improvements in symptom control and quality of life. The CBT intervention also demonstrated significant improvement in symptom control.

Conclusions: Telehealth interventions for provision of palliative care in patients with kidney failure seem promising for improvement of symptom control and quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nephrology
BMC Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
375
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nephrology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of kidney and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信