亚胺培南/西司他汀/瑞巴坦(IMI/CS/REL)的疗效和安全性:随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Wenjuan Lei, Yan Duan, Mingyan Xin, Min Tian, Jia Xu
{"title":"亚胺培南/西司他汀/瑞巴坦(IMI/CS/REL)的疗效和安全性:随机对照临床试验的荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenjuan Lei, Yan Duan, Mingyan Xin, Min Tian, Jia Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11499-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relebactam is a new inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases. The FDA has approved combining IMI/CS/REL to treat some infectious diseases. This study systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of IMI/CS/REL based on existing clinical trials so as to provide a reference for follow-up research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials published up to Mar 28, 2025, with \"Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam\" or \"IMI/CS/REL\" as keywords, and screened the results according to the proposed exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed on the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the day 28/30 all-cause mortality, clinical response rate, microbiological response rate, the adverse event response rate and drug-related adverse reaction rate were evaluated using R (4.4.3). The evaluation results were expressed in terms of relative risk with 95% confidence limit (RR, 95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs (1606 subjects) were involved in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between IMI/CS/REL and comparators in day 28/30 all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.39-1.72, P = 0.10), in clinical response rate during the early follow-up period (EFU) (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08, P = 0.67) and in microbiological response at EFU (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.76). The adverse events (AEs) rate also showed no statistical difference in each study's arms (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.08, P = 0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMI/CS/REL demonstrates a non-inferior efficacy and safety profile compared to standard comparators in treating carbapenem-susceptible or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Nevertheless, more robust clinical evidence-especially in resistant, polymicrobial, and pathogen-defined infections-is needed to fully establish its role in real-world practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"1149"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/CS/REL): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.\",\"authors\":\"Wenjuan Lei, Yan Duan, Mingyan Xin, Min Tian, Jia Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-025-11499-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Relebactam is a new inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases. The FDA has approved combining IMI/CS/REL to treat some infectious diseases. This study systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of IMI/CS/REL based on existing clinical trials so as to provide a reference for follow-up research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Researchers comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials published up to Mar 28, 2025, with \\\"Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam\\\" or \\\"IMI/CS/REL\\\" as keywords, and screened the results according to the proposed exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed on the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the day 28/30 all-cause mortality, clinical response rate, microbiological response rate, the adverse event response rate and drug-related adverse reaction rate were evaluated using R (4.4.3). The evaluation results were expressed in terms of relative risk with 95% confidence limit (RR, 95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs (1606 subjects) were involved in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between IMI/CS/REL and comparators in day 28/30 all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.39-1.72, P = 0.10), in clinical response rate during the early follow-up period (EFU) (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08, P = 0.67) and in microbiological response at EFU (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.76). The adverse events (AEs) rate also showed no statistical difference in each study's arms (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.08, P = 0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IMI/CS/REL demonstrates a non-inferior efficacy and safety profile compared to standard comparators in treating carbapenem-susceptible or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Nevertheless, more robust clinical evidence-especially in resistant, polymicrobial, and pathogen-defined infections-is needed to fully establish its role in real-world practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465972/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11499-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11499-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乐巴坦是一种新的a类和C类β-内酰胺酶抑制剂。FDA已经批准IMI/CS/REL联合治疗一些感染性疾病。本研究在现有临床试验的基础上,系统回顾了IMI/CS/REL的疗效和安全性,为后续研究提供参考。方法:以“亚胺培南/西司他汀/乐巴坦”或“IMI/CS/REL”为关键词,综合检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索截至2025年3月28日发表的随机对照试验,根据提出的排除标准和纳入标准对结果进行筛选。对纳入的随机对照试验(RCTs)进行数据提取,采用R(4.4.3)评价28/30天全因死亡率、临床反应率、微生物反应率、不良事件反应率和药物相关不良反应率。评价结果以相对危险度表示,95%置信限(RR, 95% ci)。结果:本荟萃分析共纳入6项随机对照试验(1606名受试者)。meta分析显示IMI/CS/REL与比较组在28/30天全因死亡率(RR = 0.82, 95%CI 0.39-1.72, P = 0.10)、早期随访期临床反应率(RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08, P = 0.67)和早期随访期微生物反应(RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.76)方面均无显著差异。各研究组不良事件发生率也无统计学差异(RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95 ~ 1.08, P = 0.87)。结论:IMI/CS/REL在治疗碳青霉烯敏感或耐药病原体方面的疗效和安全性优于标准对照药。然而,需要更有力的临床证据-特别是在耐药,多微生物和病原体定义的感染-来充分确定其在现实世界中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/CS/REL): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Background: Relebactam is a new inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases. The FDA has approved combining IMI/CS/REL to treat some infectious diseases. This study systematically reviews the efficacy and safety of IMI/CS/REL based on existing clinical trials so as to provide a reference for follow-up research.

Methods: Researchers comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomised controlled trials published up to Mar 28, 2025, with "Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam" or "IMI/CS/REL" as keywords, and screened the results according to the proposed exclusion and inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed on the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), while the day 28/30 all-cause mortality, clinical response rate, microbiological response rate, the adverse event response rate and drug-related adverse reaction rate were evaluated using R (4.4.3). The evaluation results were expressed in terms of relative risk with 95% confidence limit (RR, 95%CI).

Results: Six RCTs (1606 subjects) were involved in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed no significant differences between IMI/CS/REL and comparators in day 28/30 all-cause mortality (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.39-1.72, P = 0.10), in clinical response rate during the early follow-up period (EFU) (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.96-1.08, P = 0.67) and in microbiological response at EFU (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.09, P = 0.76). The adverse events (AEs) rate also showed no statistical difference in each study's arms (RR = 1.02, 95%CI 0.95-1.08, P = 0.87).

Conclusions: IMI/CS/REL demonstrates a non-inferior efficacy and safety profile compared to standard comparators in treating carbapenem-susceptible or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Nevertheless, more robust clinical evidence-especially in resistant, polymicrobial, and pathogen-defined infections-is needed to fully establish its role in real-world practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信