与非洲小型哺乳动物及其体外寄生虫相关的潜在人畜共患立克次体细菌:系统综述和荟萃分析

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Venance Theophil Msoffe, Charles M Lyimo, Moses I Olotu, Abdul S Katakweba, Rhodes H Makundi, Apia W Massawe, Gerald Misinzo, Ladslaus L Mnyone
{"title":"与非洲小型哺乳动物及其体外寄生虫相关的潜在人畜共患立克次体细菌:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Venance Theophil Msoffe, Charles M Lyimo, Moses I Olotu, Abdul S Katakweba, Rhodes H Makundi, Apia W Massawe, Gerald Misinzo, Ladslaus L Mnyone","doi":"10.1186/s12879-025-11434-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The proximity of humans to small mammals and their ectoparasites at wildlife-human interfaces in Africa creates favorable conditions for the spillover of zoonotic pathogens. Anaplasmaceae and Rickettsiaceae bacteria are emerging threats due to their genomic adaptability and resilience to environmental changes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the distribution and prevalence of these pathogens in African small mammals and their ectoparasites. A comprehensive search across five electronic databases yielded 37 studies meeting predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most frequently reported pathogens were Rickettsia felis (11 studies), Rickettsia massiliae (8 studies), and Rickettsia typhi (7 studies). A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted separately for small mammals and ectoparasites. In small mammals, the highest prevalence was observed for Anaplasma spp. (15.17%; 95% CI 8-26.9%), Rickettsia helvetica (14.65%; 95% CI 9.09-22.75%), R. felis (12%; 95% CI 6.13-22.18%), R. massiliae (10.75%; 95% CI 0.6-70.55%), and Ehrlichia spp. (10.35%; 95% CI 4.13-23.66%). Among ectoparasites, the highest prevalence was found in ticks for R. africae (41.53%; 95% CI 13.53-76.33%) and R. massiliae (30.55%; 95% CI 8.96-66.29%). In fleas, R. felis (21.68%; 95% CI 8.67-44.68%) was most prevalent. This analysis underscores the importance of molecular detection tools, such as the combination of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and sequencing for detection and identification of Rickettsiales, and highlights the dominance of R. africae, R. felis, and R. massiliae in ectoparasites, particularly in Eastern and Northern Africa. The study also underscores the impact of sample size and geographical regional differences in prevalence estimates. This review was registered in the international database of Prospectively Registered Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with ID: CRD42024552324.</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"25 1","pages":"1146"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential zoonotic rickettsiales bacteria associated with small mammals and their ectoparasites in africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Venance Theophil Msoffe, Charles M Lyimo, Moses I Olotu, Abdul S Katakweba, Rhodes H Makundi, Apia W Massawe, Gerald Misinzo, Ladslaus L Mnyone\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12879-025-11434-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The proximity of humans to small mammals and their ectoparasites at wildlife-human interfaces in Africa creates favorable conditions for the spillover of zoonotic pathogens. Anaplasmaceae and Rickettsiaceae bacteria are emerging threats due to their genomic adaptability and resilience to environmental changes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the distribution and prevalence of these pathogens in African small mammals and their ectoparasites. A comprehensive search across five electronic databases yielded 37 studies meeting predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most frequently reported pathogens were Rickettsia felis (11 studies), Rickettsia massiliae (8 studies), and Rickettsia typhi (7 studies). A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted separately for small mammals and ectoparasites. In small mammals, the highest prevalence was observed for Anaplasma spp. (15.17%; 95% CI 8-26.9%), Rickettsia helvetica (14.65%; 95% CI 9.09-22.75%), R. felis (12%; 95% CI 6.13-22.18%), R. massiliae (10.75%; 95% CI 0.6-70.55%), and Ehrlichia spp. (10.35%; 95% CI 4.13-23.66%). Among ectoparasites, the highest prevalence was found in ticks for R. africae (41.53%; 95% CI 13.53-76.33%) and R. massiliae (30.55%; 95% CI 8.96-66.29%). In fleas, R. felis (21.68%; 95% CI 8.67-44.68%) was most prevalent. This analysis underscores the importance of molecular detection tools, such as the combination of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and sequencing for detection and identification of Rickettsiales, and highlights the dominance of R. africae, R. felis, and R. massiliae in ectoparasites, particularly in Eastern and Northern Africa. The study also underscores the impact of sample size and geographical regional differences in prevalence estimates. This review was registered in the international database of Prospectively Registered Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with ID: CRD42024552324.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1146\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11434-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-11434-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在非洲,人类在野生动物-人类交界面接近小型哺乳动物及其体外寄生虫,为人畜共患病原体的外溢创造了有利条件。无原体科和立克次体科细菌由于其基因组适应性和对环境变化的恢复能力而成为新兴的威胁。本系统综述和荟萃分析调查了这些病原体在非洲小型哺乳动物及其体外寄生虫中的分布和流行情况。在5个电子数据库中进行全面搜索,得出37项研究符合预定的纳入和排除标准。最常报告的病原体是猫立克次体(11项研究)、马氏立克次体(8项研究)和斑疹立克次体(7项研究)。采用随机效应模型对小型哺乳动物和体外寄生虫分别进行了荟萃分析。在小型兽类中,患病率最高的是无原体(15.17%,95% CI 8 ~ 26.9%)、helvettica立克次体(14.65%,95% CI 9.09 ~ 22.75%)、felis (12%, 95% CI 6.13 ~ 22.18%)、马尾体(10.75%,95% CI 0.6% ~ 70.55%)和埃利希体(10.35%,95% CI 4.13 ~ 23.66%)。体外寄生虫中,蜱的感染率最高的是非洲R. (41.53%, 95% CI 13.53 ~ 76.33%)和马尾R. (30.55%, 95% CI 8.96 ~ 66.29%)。蚤类中以猫恙螨(21.68%,95% CI 8.67 ~ 44.68%)为主。这一分析强调了分子检测工具的重要性,如定量实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和测序相结合,用于立克次体的检测和鉴定,并强调了非洲疟原虫、猫疟原虫和马西疟原虫在体外寄生虫中的优势地位,特别是在东非和北非。该研究还强调了样本量和地理区域差异对患病率估计的影响。该综述已在国际前瞻性注册系统评价数据库(PROSPERO)中注册,ID: CRD42024552324。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Potential zoonotic rickettsiales bacteria associated with small mammals and their ectoparasites in africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The proximity of humans to small mammals and their ectoparasites at wildlife-human interfaces in Africa creates favorable conditions for the spillover of zoonotic pathogens. Anaplasmaceae and Rickettsiaceae bacteria are emerging threats due to their genomic adaptability and resilience to environmental changes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the distribution and prevalence of these pathogens in African small mammals and their ectoparasites. A comprehensive search across five electronic databases yielded 37 studies meeting predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most frequently reported pathogens were Rickettsia felis (11 studies), Rickettsia massiliae (8 studies), and Rickettsia typhi (7 studies). A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was conducted separately for small mammals and ectoparasites. In small mammals, the highest prevalence was observed for Anaplasma spp. (15.17%; 95% CI 8-26.9%), Rickettsia helvetica (14.65%; 95% CI 9.09-22.75%), R. felis (12%; 95% CI 6.13-22.18%), R. massiliae (10.75%; 95% CI 0.6-70.55%), and Ehrlichia spp. (10.35%; 95% CI 4.13-23.66%). Among ectoparasites, the highest prevalence was found in ticks for R. africae (41.53%; 95% CI 13.53-76.33%) and R. massiliae (30.55%; 95% CI 8.96-66.29%). In fleas, R. felis (21.68%; 95% CI 8.67-44.68%) was most prevalent. This analysis underscores the importance of molecular detection tools, such as the combination of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and sequencing for detection and identification of Rickettsiales, and highlights the dominance of R. africae, R. felis, and R. massiliae in ectoparasites, particularly in Eastern and Northern Africa. The study also underscores the impact of sample size and geographical regional differences in prevalence estimates. This review was registered in the international database of Prospectively Registered Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with ID: CRD42024552324.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信