{"title":"磁场治疗和按摩对上斜方肌张力、颅椎角和肩胛骨指数的影响。","authors":"Do-Youn Lee, Seong-Gil Kim","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12090925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of magnetic field therapy and massage on upper trapezius muscle tone, craniovertebral angle (CVA), and scapular index in young adults. Thirty participants were randomly assigned to a magnetic field group or a massage group (n = 15 each), receiving interventions twice a week for two weeks with a one-week follow-up. Measurements were taken at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up using MyotonPRO, lateral photographs, and anatomical distances. The magnetic group showed a greater reduction in muscle tone at post-intervention and follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.015, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.28, large effect) than the massage group. Elasticity decreased significantly in both groups, but follow-up values were lower in the magnetic group (<i>p</i> < 0.05, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.25, medium effect). CVA improved in both groups, with a larger change in the magnetic group and sustained gains at follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.001, partial η<sup>2</sup> up to 0.43, large effect). The scapular index increased only in the magnetic group post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.013, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.49, large effect) but returned to baseline at follow-up. Magnetic field therapy appears more effective than massage for improving muscle tone, posture, and scapular alignment in the short term, and may be a valuable option for clinical postural correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Magnetic Field Therapy and Massage on Upper Trapezius Muscle Tone, Craniovertebral Angle, and Scapular Index.\",\"authors\":\"Do-Youn Lee, Seong-Gil Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12090925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the effects of magnetic field therapy and massage on upper trapezius muscle tone, craniovertebral angle (CVA), and scapular index in young adults. Thirty participants were randomly assigned to a magnetic field group or a massage group (n = 15 each), receiving interventions twice a week for two weeks with a one-week follow-up. Measurements were taken at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up using MyotonPRO, lateral photographs, and anatomical distances. The magnetic group showed a greater reduction in muscle tone at post-intervention and follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.015, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.28, large effect) than the massage group. Elasticity decreased significantly in both groups, but follow-up values were lower in the magnetic group (<i>p</i> < 0.05, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.25, medium effect). CVA improved in both groups, with a larger change in the magnetic group and sustained gains at follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.001, partial η<sup>2</sup> up to 0.43, large effect). The scapular index increased only in the magnetic group post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.013, partial η<sup>2</sup> = 0.49, large effect) but returned to baseline at follow-up. Magnetic field therapy appears more effective than massage for improving muscle tone, posture, and scapular alignment in the short term, and may be a valuable option for clinical postural correction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090925\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090925","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Magnetic Field Therapy and Massage on Upper Trapezius Muscle Tone, Craniovertebral Angle, and Scapular Index.
This study investigated the effects of magnetic field therapy and massage on upper trapezius muscle tone, craniovertebral angle (CVA), and scapular index in young adults. Thirty participants were randomly assigned to a magnetic field group or a massage group (n = 15 each), receiving interventions twice a week for two weeks with a one-week follow-up. Measurements were taken at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up using MyotonPRO, lateral photographs, and anatomical distances. The magnetic group showed a greater reduction in muscle tone at post-intervention and follow-up (p = 0.015, partial η2 = 0.28, large effect) than the massage group. Elasticity decreased significantly in both groups, but follow-up values were lower in the magnetic group (p < 0.05, partial η2 = 0.25, medium effect). CVA improved in both groups, with a larger change in the magnetic group and sustained gains at follow-up (p < 0.001, partial η2 up to 0.43, large effect). The scapular index increased only in the magnetic group post-intervention (p = 0.013, partial η2 = 0.49, large effect) but returned to baseline at follow-up. Magnetic field therapy appears more effective than massage for improving muscle tone, posture, and scapular alignment in the short term, and may be a valuable option for clinical postural correction.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering