Dominik Pandurević, Paweł Draga, Alexander Sutor, Klaus Hochradel
{"title":"速度攀爬的性能洞察:关键运动指标的定量和定性分析。","authors":"Dominik Pandurević, Paweł Draga, Alexander Sutor, Klaus Hochradel","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12090957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Speed Climbing athletes by examining motion parameters critical to elite performance. As such, several key values are extracted from about 900 competition recordings in order to generate a dataset for the identification of patterns in athletes' technique and efficiency. A CNN-based framework is used to automate the detection of human keypoints and features, enabling a large-scale evaluation of climbing dynamics. The results revealed significant variations in performance for single sections of the wall, particularly in relation to start reaction times (with differences of up to 0.27 s) and increased split times the closer the athletes are to the end of the Speed Climbing wall (from 0.39 s to 0.45 s). In addition, a more detailed examination of the movement sequences was carried out by analyzing the velocity trajectories of hands and feet. The results showed that coordinated and harmonic movements, especially of the lower limbs, correlate strongly with the performance outcome. To ensure an individualized view of the data points, a comparison was made between multiple athletes, revealing insights into the influence of individual biomechanics on the efficiency of movements. The findings provide both trainers and athletes with interesting insights in relation to tailoring training methods by including split time benchmarks and limb coordination.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467755/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Insights in Speed Climbing: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Key Movement Metrics.\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Pandurević, Paweł Draga, Alexander Sutor, Klaus Hochradel\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12090957\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Speed Climbing athletes by examining motion parameters critical to elite performance. As such, several key values are extracted from about 900 competition recordings in order to generate a dataset for the identification of patterns in athletes' technique and efficiency. A CNN-based framework is used to automate the detection of human keypoints and features, enabling a large-scale evaluation of climbing dynamics. The results revealed significant variations in performance for single sections of the wall, particularly in relation to start reaction times (with differences of up to 0.27 s) and increased split times the closer the athletes are to the end of the Speed Climbing wall (from 0.39 s to 0.45 s). In addition, a more detailed examination of the movement sequences was carried out by analyzing the velocity trajectories of hands and feet. The results showed that coordinated and harmonic movements, especially of the lower limbs, correlate strongly with the performance outcome. To ensure an individualized view of the data points, a comparison was made between multiple athletes, revealing insights into the influence of individual biomechanics on the efficiency of movements. The findings provide both trainers and athletes with interesting insights in relation to tailoring training methods by including split time benchmarks and limb coordination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467755/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090957\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090957","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance Insights in Speed Climbing: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Key Movement Metrics.
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Speed Climbing athletes by examining motion parameters critical to elite performance. As such, several key values are extracted from about 900 competition recordings in order to generate a dataset for the identification of patterns in athletes' technique and efficiency. A CNN-based framework is used to automate the detection of human keypoints and features, enabling a large-scale evaluation of climbing dynamics. The results revealed significant variations in performance for single sections of the wall, particularly in relation to start reaction times (with differences of up to 0.27 s) and increased split times the closer the athletes are to the end of the Speed Climbing wall (from 0.39 s to 0.45 s). In addition, a more detailed examination of the movement sequences was carried out by analyzing the velocity trajectories of hands and feet. The results showed that coordinated and harmonic movements, especially of the lower limbs, correlate strongly with the performance outcome. To ensure an individualized view of the data points, a comparison was made between multiple athletes, revealing insights into the influence of individual biomechanics on the efficiency of movements. The findings provide both trainers and athletes with interesting insights in relation to tailoring training methods by including split time benchmarks and limb coordination.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering