{"title":"CFR-PEEK和金属骨植入物发生磨损的临床证据:系统的文献综述。","authors":"Remco Doodkorte, Rachèl Kuske, Jacobus Arts","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12090965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) as an alternative to metallics in orthopedic implants offers biomechanical and radiological advantages. However, the extent of wear particle generation and its clinical impact are unclear. This systematic review evaluates clinical evidence of wear in fracture fixation devices. A systematic search was conducted to identify clinical studies reporting wear of metallic and CFR-PEEK implants used in extremities. Nineteen studies were included: three prospective cohorts, eight retrospective cohorts, one case series, and six case reports. Among 208 fixation plates, 43 were CFR-PEEK and all 93 intramedullary nails were metallic. Risk of bias ranged from low to serious, mainly due to selection bias. Wear-related complications were reported for both materials. Metallic implants showed elevated serum ion levels, metallic debris in tissues, and, in some cases, metallosis. CFR-PEEK implants showed limited evidence of carbon fiber fragments near implants. One comparative study reported higher inflammatory responses in CFR-PEEK explants, though no direct link between debris and implant removal was found. Both metallic and CFR-PEEK fracture fixation devices generate wear particles, which may induce biological responses. However, wear-related complications appear rare, especially with validated implant designs, and clinical significance of wear debris remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Evidence of Wear Occurrence in CFR-PEEK and Metallic Osteosynthesis Implants: A Systematic Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Remco Doodkorte, Rachèl Kuske, Jacobus Arts\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12090965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) as an alternative to metallics in orthopedic implants offers biomechanical and radiological advantages. However, the extent of wear particle generation and its clinical impact are unclear. This systematic review evaluates clinical evidence of wear in fracture fixation devices. A systematic search was conducted to identify clinical studies reporting wear of metallic and CFR-PEEK implants used in extremities. Nineteen studies were included: three prospective cohorts, eight retrospective cohorts, one case series, and six case reports. Among 208 fixation plates, 43 were CFR-PEEK and all 93 intramedullary nails were metallic. Risk of bias ranged from low to serious, mainly due to selection bias. Wear-related complications were reported for both materials. Metallic implants showed elevated serum ion levels, metallic debris in tissues, and, in some cases, metallosis. CFR-PEEK implants showed limited evidence of carbon fiber fragments near implants. One comparative study reported higher inflammatory responses in CFR-PEEK explants, though no direct link between debris and implant removal was found. Both metallic and CFR-PEEK fracture fixation devices generate wear particles, which may induce biological responses. However, wear-related complications appear rare, especially with validated implant designs, and clinical significance of wear debris remains limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467306/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090965\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Evidence of Wear Occurrence in CFR-PEEK and Metallic Osteosynthesis Implants: A Systematic Literature Review.
Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) as an alternative to metallics in orthopedic implants offers biomechanical and radiological advantages. However, the extent of wear particle generation and its clinical impact are unclear. This systematic review evaluates clinical evidence of wear in fracture fixation devices. A systematic search was conducted to identify clinical studies reporting wear of metallic and CFR-PEEK implants used in extremities. Nineteen studies were included: three prospective cohorts, eight retrospective cohorts, one case series, and six case reports. Among 208 fixation plates, 43 were CFR-PEEK and all 93 intramedullary nails were metallic. Risk of bias ranged from low to serious, mainly due to selection bias. Wear-related complications were reported for both materials. Metallic implants showed elevated serum ion levels, metallic debris in tissues, and, in some cases, metallosis. CFR-PEEK implants showed limited evidence of carbon fiber fragments near implants. One comparative study reported higher inflammatory responses in CFR-PEEK explants, though no direct link between debris and implant removal was found. Both metallic and CFR-PEEK fracture fixation devices generate wear particles, which may induce biological responses. However, wear-related complications appear rare, especially with validated implant designs, and clinical significance of wear debris remains limited.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering