{"title":"再论动态生物力学系统中的机械功-能框架。","authors":"Donglu Shi","doi":"10.3390/bioengineering12090977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The classical definition of mechanical work, W = F × D, assumes that work depends solely on force magnitude and displacement, independent of loading rate. However, biological tissues exhibit inherent rate sensitivity-muscles demonstrate velocity-dependent force generation governed by Hill's force-velocity relationship, while connective tissues and joints show load-rate-dependent stiffness and injury thresholds. These rate effects profoundly influence mechanical work, energy dissipation, and functional outcomes. In this work, we revisit the work-energy framework within biomechanics and biomaterials contexts, combining theoretical models, simulations, and a proposed rate-matched nano-bio indentation experiment to quantify how loading rate modulates energy partitioning between recoverable elastic storage and irreversible viscous dissipation. Our analyses span muscle contraction, viscoelastic tissue mechanics, and nanoparticle-membrane interactions, revealing that rapid loading markedly increases viscous dissipation and total mechanical work, even when peak force and displacement remain constant. We demonstrate that classical quasi-static formulations underestimate energy costs and tissue stresses by neglecting temporal dynamics and nonlinear material responses. Our multi-physics experimental-simulation platform bridges this gap, enabling controlled investigation of rate-dependent biomechanical phenomena at the nano-bio interface. These insights inform biomaterials design by emphasizing rate-matching viscoelastic properties to native tissues and guide experimental biomechanics toward capturing full dynamic histories. This unified framework advances understanding of rate-dependent mechanical work, improving predictive modeling, optimizing therapeutic delivery, and enhancing design in sports science, orthopedics, rehabilitation, and nanomedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":8874,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering","volume":"12 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Mechanical Work-Energy Framework in Dynamic Biomechanical Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Donglu Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bioengineering12090977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The classical definition of mechanical work, W = F × D, assumes that work depends solely on force magnitude and displacement, independent of loading rate. However, biological tissues exhibit inherent rate sensitivity-muscles demonstrate velocity-dependent force generation governed by Hill's force-velocity relationship, while connective tissues and joints show load-rate-dependent stiffness and injury thresholds. These rate effects profoundly influence mechanical work, energy dissipation, and functional outcomes. In this work, we revisit the work-energy framework within biomechanics and biomaterials contexts, combining theoretical models, simulations, and a proposed rate-matched nano-bio indentation experiment to quantify how loading rate modulates energy partitioning between recoverable elastic storage and irreversible viscous dissipation. Our analyses span muscle contraction, viscoelastic tissue mechanics, and nanoparticle-membrane interactions, revealing that rapid loading markedly increases viscous dissipation and total mechanical work, even when peak force and displacement remain constant. We demonstrate that classical quasi-static formulations underestimate energy costs and tissue stresses by neglecting temporal dynamics and nonlinear material responses. Our multi-physics experimental-simulation platform bridges this gap, enabling controlled investigation of rate-dependent biomechanical phenomena at the nano-bio interface. These insights inform biomaterials design by emphasizing rate-matching viscoelastic properties to native tissues and guide experimental biomechanics toward capturing full dynamic histories. This unified framework advances understanding of rate-dependent mechanical work, improving predictive modeling, optimizing therapeutic delivery, and enhancing design in sports science, orthopedics, rehabilitation, and nanomedicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioengineering\",\"volume\":\"12 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioengineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12090977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
机械功的经典定义W = F × D假定功仅取决于力的大小和位移,而与加载速率无关。然而,生物组织表现出固有的速率敏感性——肌肉表现出受Hill力-速度关系支配的速度依赖性力产生,而结缔组织和关节则表现出负载率依赖性刚度和损伤阈值。这些速率效应深刻地影响机械功、能量耗散和功能结果。在这项工作中,我们重新回顾了生物力学和生物材料背景下的工作-能量框架,结合理论模型,模拟和提出的速率匹配纳米生物压痕实验,以量化加载速率如何调节可恢复弹性存储和不可逆粘性耗散之间的能量分配。我们的分析跨越了肌肉收缩、粘弹性组织力学和纳米颗粒-膜相互作用,揭示了快速加载显著增加粘性耗散和总机械功,即使在峰值力和位移保持不变的情况下也是如此。我们证明了经典的准静态公式通过忽略时间动力学和非线性材料响应而低估了能量成本和组织应力。我们的多物理场实验模拟平台弥补了这一差距,能够在纳米生物界面上对速率相关的生物力学现象进行控制研究。这些见解通过强调与原生组织的速率匹配的粘弹性特性,为生物材料的设计提供了信息,并指导实验生物力学捕捉完整的动态历史。这个统一的框架促进了对速率依赖的机械功的理解,改进了预测建模,优化了治疗递送,并加强了运动科学、骨科、康复和纳米医学的设计。
Revisiting the Mechanical Work-Energy Framework in Dynamic Biomechanical Systems.
The classical definition of mechanical work, W = F × D, assumes that work depends solely on force magnitude and displacement, independent of loading rate. However, biological tissues exhibit inherent rate sensitivity-muscles demonstrate velocity-dependent force generation governed by Hill's force-velocity relationship, while connective tissues and joints show load-rate-dependent stiffness and injury thresholds. These rate effects profoundly influence mechanical work, energy dissipation, and functional outcomes. In this work, we revisit the work-energy framework within biomechanics and biomaterials contexts, combining theoretical models, simulations, and a proposed rate-matched nano-bio indentation experiment to quantify how loading rate modulates energy partitioning between recoverable elastic storage and irreversible viscous dissipation. Our analyses span muscle contraction, viscoelastic tissue mechanics, and nanoparticle-membrane interactions, revealing that rapid loading markedly increases viscous dissipation and total mechanical work, even when peak force and displacement remain constant. We demonstrate that classical quasi-static formulations underestimate energy costs and tissue stresses by neglecting temporal dynamics and nonlinear material responses. Our multi-physics experimental-simulation platform bridges this gap, enabling controlled investigation of rate-dependent biomechanical phenomena at the nano-bio interface. These insights inform biomaterials design by emphasizing rate-matching viscoelastic properties to native tissues and guide experimental biomechanics toward capturing full dynamic histories. This unified framework advances understanding of rate-dependent mechanical work, improving predictive modeling, optimizing therapeutic delivery, and enhancing design in sports science, orthopedics, rehabilitation, and nanomedicine.
期刊介绍:
Aims
Bioengineering (ISSN 2306-5354) provides an advanced forum for the science and technology of bioengineering. It publishes original research papers, comprehensive reviews, communications and case reports. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. All aspects of bioengineering are welcomed from theoretical concepts to education and applications. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, four key features of this Journal:
● We are introducing a new concept in scientific and technical publications “The Translational Case Report in Bioengineering”. It is a descriptive explanatory analysis of a transformative or translational event. Understanding that the goal of bioengineering scholarship is to advance towards a transformative or clinical solution to an identified transformative/clinical need, the translational case report is used to explore causation in order to find underlying principles that may guide other similar transformative/translational undertakings.
● Manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed.
● Electronic files and software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
● We also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds.
Scope
● Bionics and biological cybernetics: implantology; bio–abio interfaces
● Bioelectronics: wearable electronics; implantable electronics; “more than Moore” electronics; bioelectronics devices
● Bioprocess and biosystems engineering and applications: bioprocess design; biocatalysis; bioseparation and bioreactors; bioinformatics; bioenergy; etc.
● Biomolecular, cellular and tissue engineering and applications: tissue engineering; chromosome engineering; embryo engineering; cellular, molecular and synthetic biology; metabolic engineering; bio-nanotechnology; micro/nano technologies; genetic engineering; transgenic technology
● Biomedical engineering and applications: biomechatronics; biomedical electronics; biomechanics; biomaterials; biomimetics; biomedical diagnostics; biomedical therapy; biomedical devices; sensors and circuits; biomedical imaging and medical information systems; implants and regenerative medicine; neurotechnology; clinical engineering; rehabilitation engineering
● Biochemical engineering and applications: metabolic pathway engineering; modeling and simulation
● Translational bioengineering