Giovanni Di Stefano, Sergio Salerno, Domenica Matranga, Manuela Lodico, Dario Monzani, Valeria Seidita, Roberto Cannella, Laura Maniscalco, Silvana Miceli
{"title":"放射科员工的人工智能感知与技术压力:人工智能接受度的中介作用和自我效能感的调节作用","authors":"Giovanni Di Stefano, Sergio Salerno, Domenica Matranga, Manuela Lodico, Dario Monzani, Valeria Seidita, Roberto Cannella, Laura Maniscalco, Silvana Miceli","doi":"10.3390/bs15091276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined how perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) relate to technostress in healthcare professionals, testing whether AI acceptance mediates this relationship and whether self-efficacy moderates the formation of acceptance. Seventy-one participants completed measures of Perceptions of AI (Shinners), AI Acceptance (UTAUT), Self-Efficacy, and four technostress outcomes: Technostress Overall, Techno-Overload, Techno-Complexity/Insecurity, and Techno-Uncertainty. Conditional process analyses (PROCESS Model 7; 5000 bootstrap samples) were performed controlling for sex, age (years), and professional role (radiology residents, attending radiologists, PhD researchers). Perceptions of AI were directly and positively associated with Technostress Overall (b = 0.57, <i>p</i> = 0.003), Techno-Overload (b = 0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and Techno-Complexity/Insecurity (b = 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but not with Techno-Uncertainty (b = -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.930). AI Acceptance negatively predicted the same three outcomes (e.g., Technostress Overall b = -0.55, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and conditional indirect effects indicated significant negative mediation at low, mean, and high self-efficacy for these three outcomes. Self-efficacy moderated the Perceptions → Acceptance path (interaction b = -0.165, <i>p</i> = 0.028), with a stronger X→M effect at lower self-efficacy, but indices of moderated mediation were not significant for any outcome. The results suggest that perceptions of AI exert both demand-like direct effects and buffering indirect effects via acceptance; implementation should therefore foster acceptance, build competence, and address workload and organizational clarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8742,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sciences","volume":"15 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Perceptions and Technostress in Staff Radiologists: The Mediating Role of Artificial Intelligence Acceptance and the Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Di Stefano, Sergio Salerno, Domenica Matranga, Manuela Lodico, Dario Monzani, Valeria Seidita, Roberto Cannella, Laura Maniscalco, Silvana Miceli\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/bs15091276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined how perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) relate to technostress in healthcare professionals, testing whether AI acceptance mediates this relationship and whether self-efficacy moderates the formation of acceptance. Seventy-one participants completed measures of Perceptions of AI (Shinners), AI Acceptance (UTAUT), Self-Efficacy, and four technostress outcomes: Technostress Overall, Techno-Overload, Techno-Complexity/Insecurity, and Techno-Uncertainty. Conditional process analyses (PROCESS Model 7; 5000 bootstrap samples) were performed controlling for sex, age (years), and professional role (radiology residents, attending radiologists, PhD researchers). Perceptions of AI were directly and positively associated with Technostress Overall (b = 0.57, <i>p</i> = 0.003), Techno-Overload (b = 0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.008), and Techno-Complexity/Insecurity (b = 0.83, <i>p</i> < 0.001), but not with Techno-Uncertainty (b = -0.02, <i>p</i> = 0.930). AI Acceptance negatively predicted the same three outcomes (e.g., Technostress Overall b = -0.55, <i>p</i> = 0.004), and conditional indirect effects indicated significant negative mediation at low, mean, and high self-efficacy for these three outcomes. Self-efficacy moderated the Perceptions → Acceptance path (interaction b = -0.165, <i>p</i> = 0.028), with a stronger X→M effect at lower self-efficacy, but indices of moderated mediation were not significant for any outcome. The results suggest that perceptions of AI exert both demand-like direct effects and buffering indirect effects via acceptance; implementation should therefore foster acceptance, build competence, and address workload and organizational clarity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"15 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091276\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15091276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究考察了医疗保健专业人员对人工智能(AI)的认知与技术压力之间的关系,测试了人工智能接受度是否介导了这种关系,以及自我效能感是否调节了接受度的形成。71名参与者完成了对人工智能的感知(Shinners)、人工智能接受(UTAUT)、自我效能和四项技术压力结果的测量:技术压力总体、技术超载、技术复杂性/不安全感和技术不确定性。进行条件过程分析(过程模型7;5000个bootstrap样本),控制性别、年龄和专业角色(放射科住院医师、主治放射科医生、博士研究人员)。对人工智能的感知与技术压力总体(b = 0.57, p = 0.003)、技术过载(b = 0.58, p = 0.008)和技术复杂性/不安全感(b = 0.83, p < 0.001)直接呈正相关,但与技术不确定性(b = -0.02, p = 0.930)无关。人工智能接受负向预测相同的三个结果(例如,技术压力总体b = -0.55, p = 0.004),条件间接效应表明在低、中、高自我效能对这三个结果有显著的负向中介作用。自我效能调节感知→接受路径(交互作用b = -0.165, p = 0.028),自我效能较低时,X→M效应更强,但调节的指标对任何结果均不显著。结果表明,对人工智能的感知既会产生需求样的直接影响,也会通过接受来缓冲间接影响;因此,实现应该促进接受,建立能力,并处理工作量和组织清晰度。
Artificial Intelligence Perceptions and Technostress in Staff Radiologists: The Mediating Role of Artificial Intelligence Acceptance and the Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy.
This study examined how perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) relate to technostress in healthcare professionals, testing whether AI acceptance mediates this relationship and whether self-efficacy moderates the formation of acceptance. Seventy-one participants completed measures of Perceptions of AI (Shinners), AI Acceptance (UTAUT), Self-Efficacy, and four technostress outcomes: Technostress Overall, Techno-Overload, Techno-Complexity/Insecurity, and Techno-Uncertainty. Conditional process analyses (PROCESS Model 7; 5000 bootstrap samples) were performed controlling for sex, age (years), and professional role (radiology residents, attending radiologists, PhD researchers). Perceptions of AI were directly and positively associated with Technostress Overall (b = 0.57, p = 0.003), Techno-Overload (b = 0.58, p = 0.008), and Techno-Complexity/Insecurity (b = 0.83, p < 0.001), but not with Techno-Uncertainty (b = -0.02, p = 0.930). AI Acceptance negatively predicted the same three outcomes (e.g., Technostress Overall b = -0.55, p = 0.004), and conditional indirect effects indicated significant negative mediation at low, mean, and high self-efficacy for these three outcomes. Self-efficacy moderated the Perceptions → Acceptance path (interaction b = -0.165, p = 0.028), with a stronger X→M effect at lower self-efficacy, but indices of moderated mediation were not significant for any outcome. The results suggest that perceptions of AI exert both demand-like direct effects and buffering indirect effects via acceptance; implementation should therefore foster acceptance, build competence, and address workload and organizational clarity.