不同交配方式和手术方式对建立小鼠胎儿无瘢痕皮肤愈合模型的影响。

IF 4.3 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Lu Huang, Xinran Ye, Yifan Zhang, Chia-Kang Ho, Qingfeng Li
{"title":"不同交配方式和手术方式对建立小鼠胎儿无瘢痕皮肤愈合模型的影响。","authors":"Lu Huang, Xinran Ye, Yifan Zhang, Chia-Kang Ho, Qingfeng Li","doi":"10.1186/s12575-025-00290-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mouse fetal intrauterine wound healing model is crucial and commonly used for investigating mechanisms and evaluating potential therapies for scarless skin regeneration compared to fibrotic healing. However, traditional intrauterine surgery remains technically challenging and understudied, which is associated with high maternal mortality and pregnancy loss, prompting us to refine the surgical protocol. Here, we report how the choice of surgical and mating procedure impact outcomes obtained.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant mice underwent fetal surgery at embryonic days 15.5, 16.5 (E15.5, E16.5, scarless) and 18.5 (e18.5, fibrotic). Two surgical protocols were used: traditional method involved purse-string sutures, microsurgical scissors, amniotic fluid supplementation, and suture closure (Traditional); and our modified method omitting purse-string sutures, replacing scissors with needle puncture for uterine and fetal incisions, eliminating amniotic fluid supplementation, and employing skin staples for abdominal closure (Modified).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified protocol significantly increased the likelihood of successful pregnancy, reduced operative time, decreased abortion rates, and enabled earlier modeling compared to the traditional method. At 48 h, 7 days, and 9 days post-surgery, E15.5 wounds healed scarlessly, displaying regenerated hair follicles and organized collagen. Conversely, E18.5 wounds formed typical fibrotic scars, characterized by dense, disorganized collagen without hair follicles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The optimized surgical protocol presented here provides a simplified, reliable fetal mouse model with improved pregnancy success, reduced fetal loss, earlier implementation, and consistent phenotypic outcomes. This refined model enhances experimental efficiency, reproducibility, and animal welfare, having a major impact on mechanistic studies and therapeutic exploration for scarless skin regeneration.</p>","PeriodicalId":8960,"journal":{"name":"Biological Procedures Online","volume":"27 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of different mating and surgical protocols on the establishment of a mouse model for fetal scarless skin healing.\",\"authors\":\"Lu Huang, Xinran Ye, Yifan Zhang, Chia-Kang Ho, Qingfeng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12575-025-00290-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mouse fetal intrauterine wound healing model is crucial and commonly used for investigating mechanisms and evaluating potential therapies for scarless skin regeneration compared to fibrotic healing. However, traditional intrauterine surgery remains technically challenging and understudied, which is associated with high maternal mortality and pregnancy loss, prompting us to refine the surgical protocol. Here, we report how the choice of surgical and mating procedure impact outcomes obtained.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnant mice underwent fetal surgery at embryonic days 15.5, 16.5 (E15.5, E16.5, scarless) and 18.5 (e18.5, fibrotic). Two surgical protocols were used: traditional method involved purse-string sutures, microsurgical scissors, amniotic fluid supplementation, and suture closure (Traditional); and our modified method omitting purse-string sutures, replacing scissors with needle puncture for uterine and fetal incisions, eliminating amniotic fluid supplementation, and employing skin staples for abdominal closure (Modified).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The modified protocol significantly increased the likelihood of successful pregnancy, reduced operative time, decreased abortion rates, and enabled earlier modeling compared to the traditional method. At 48 h, 7 days, and 9 days post-surgery, E15.5 wounds healed scarlessly, displaying regenerated hair follicles and organized collagen. Conversely, E18.5 wounds formed typical fibrotic scars, characterized by dense, disorganized collagen without hair follicles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The optimized surgical protocol presented here provides a simplified, reliable fetal mouse model with improved pregnancy success, reduced fetal loss, earlier implementation, and consistent phenotypic outcomes. This refined model enhances experimental efficiency, reproducibility, and animal welfare, having a major impact on mechanistic studies and therapeutic exploration for scarless skin regeneration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Procedures Online\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12466002/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Procedures Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-025-00290-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Procedures Online","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-025-00290-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与纤维化愈合相比,小鼠胎儿宫内伤口愈合模型是研究无疤痕皮肤再生机制和评估潜在治疗方法的关键。然而,传统的宫内手术在技术上仍然具有挑战性且研究不足,这与高产妇死亡率和妊娠丢失有关,促使我们改进手术方案。在这里,我们报告了手术和交配程序的选择如何影响获得的结果。方法:孕鼠在胚胎期15.5、16.5 (E15.5、E16.5,无瘢痕)和18.5 (e18.5,纤维化)进行胚胎手术。采用两种手术方案:传统方法包括荷包线缝合、显微手术剪刀、羊水补充和缝合(传统);我们的改进方法省去了荷包线缝合,子宫和胎儿切口用针刺代替剪刀,取消了羊水补充,使用皮肤钉缝合腹部(改进)。结果:与传统方法相比,改进后的方案显著提高了成功妊娠的可能性,减少了手术时间,降低了流产率,并且可以更早地建模。术后48小时、7天和9天,E15.5伤口愈合无瘢痕,毛囊再生,胶原蛋白有组织。相反,E18.5伤口形成典型的纤维化疤痕,其特征是胶原蛋白致密,无组织,无毛囊。结论:本文提出的优化手术方案提供了一个简化、可靠的胎鼠模型,提高了妊娠成功率,减少了胎儿丢失,更早实施,并且表型结果一致。这种改进的模型提高了实验效率、可重复性和动物福利,对无疤痕皮肤再生的机制研究和治疗探索具有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of different mating and surgical protocols on the establishment of a mouse model for fetal scarless skin healing.

Background: The mouse fetal intrauterine wound healing model is crucial and commonly used for investigating mechanisms and evaluating potential therapies for scarless skin regeneration compared to fibrotic healing. However, traditional intrauterine surgery remains technically challenging and understudied, which is associated with high maternal mortality and pregnancy loss, prompting us to refine the surgical protocol. Here, we report how the choice of surgical and mating procedure impact outcomes obtained.

Methods: Pregnant mice underwent fetal surgery at embryonic days 15.5, 16.5 (E15.5, E16.5, scarless) and 18.5 (e18.5, fibrotic). Two surgical protocols were used: traditional method involved purse-string sutures, microsurgical scissors, amniotic fluid supplementation, and suture closure (Traditional); and our modified method omitting purse-string sutures, replacing scissors with needle puncture for uterine and fetal incisions, eliminating amniotic fluid supplementation, and employing skin staples for abdominal closure (Modified).

Results: The modified protocol significantly increased the likelihood of successful pregnancy, reduced operative time, decreased abortion rates, and enabled earlier modeling compared to the traditional method. At 48 h, 7 days, and 9 days post-surgery, E15.5 wounds healed scarlessly, displaying regenerated hair follicles and organized collagen. Conversely, E18.5 wounds formed typical fibrotic scars, characterized by dense, disorganized collagen without hair follicles.

Conclusion: The optimized surgical protocol presented here provides a simplified, reliable fetal mouse model with improved pregnancy success, reduced fetal loss, earlier implementation, and consistent phenotypic outcomes. This refined model enhances experimental efficiency, reproducibility, and animal welfare, having a major impact on mechanistic studies and therapeutic exploration for scarless skin regeneration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Procedures Online
Biological Procedures Online 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: iological Procedures Online publishes articles that improve access to techniques and methods in the medical and biological sciences. We are also interested in short but important research discoveries, such as new animal disease models. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: Reports of new research techniques and applications of existing techniques Technical analyses of research techniques and published reports Validity analyses of research methods and approaches to judging the validity of research reports Application of common research methods Reviews of existing techniques Novel/important product information Biological Procedures Online places emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches that integrate methodologies from medicine, biology, chemistry, imaging, engineering, bioinformatics, computer science, and systems analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信