脂蛋白(a)在心血管风险分层中的作用:整合低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和多基因风险评分。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Lei Liu, Huihui Ma, Senwen Yang, Chaoping Yu, Tianhu Liu, Mingjiang Liu, Xiangbin Xiao, Rong Luo, Xiaoping Li
{"title":"脂蛋白(a)在心血管风险分层中的作用:整合低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和多基因风险评分。","authors":"Lei Liu, Huihui Ma, Senwen Yang, Chaoping Yu, Tianhu Liu, Mingjiang Liu, Xiangbin Xiao, Rong Luo, Xiaoping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-density lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a well-established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). However, the interaction between Lp(a), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and polygenic risk score (PRS) in cardiovascular diseases has been the subject of relatively limited research. The present study included a total of 346,751 participants from the UK Biobank. According to the guideline of Lp(a), the study subjects were divided into three groups: the first group was < 75 mmol/L (n = 272,643), the second group was 75 - 125 mmol/L (n = 35,792), and the third group was > 125 mmol/L (n = 38,316). Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a progressively increased risk of overall cardiovascular events (CVEs), including ischemic stroke (IS), coronary heart disease (CHD), angina pectoris, and myocardial infarction (MI). In contrast, the risks of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) decreased with higher Lp(a) levels. Additive interaction analyses revealed significant synergistic effects between Lp(a) and LDL-C for CHD [relative excess risk interaction (RERI) = 0.081, attributable proportion of interaction (AP) = 0.046, synergy index (SI) = 1.117], angina pectoris [RERI = 0.112, AP = 0.055, SI = 1.121], and MI [RERI = 0.183, AP = 0.079, SI = 1.161], with MI showing the strongest synergy. Incorporating PRS further amplified these effects, and the RERI [CHD: RERI = 0.721; angina pectoris: RERI = 0.781; MI: RERI = 1.318] and SI [CHD: SI = 2.218; angina pectoris: SI = 1.97; MI: SI = 2.326)] were significantly higher than those of the interaction model containing only Lp(a) and LDL-C. In conclusion, Lp(a) and LDL-C show a significant synergistic effect in ASCVD, and this effect is more prominent in individuals with a higher PRS, suggesting that dual lipid management should be strengthened for such populations. While AF and HF may require alternative risk factor management.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Lipoprotein(a) in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: IntegratingLow-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Polygenic Risk Scores.\",\"authors\":\"Lei Liu, Huihui Ma, Senwen Yang, Chaoping Yu, Tianhu Liu, Mingjiang Liu, Xiangbin Xiao, Rong Luo, Xiaoping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>High-density lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a well-established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). However, the interaction between Lp(a), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and polygenic risk score (PRS) in cardiovascular diseases has been the subject of relatively limited research. The present study included a total of 346,751 participants from the UK Biobank. According to the guideline of Lp(a), the study subjects were divided into three groups: the first group was < 75 mmol/L (n = 272,643), the second group was 75 - 125 mmol/L (n = 35,792), and the third group was > 125 mmol/L (n = 38,316). Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a progressively increased risk of overall cardiovascular events (CVEs), including ischemic stroke (IS), coronary heart disease (CHD), angina pectoris, and myocardial infarction (MI). In contrast, the risks of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) decreased with higher Lp(a) levels. Additive interaction analyses revealed significant synergistic effects between Lp(a) and LDL-C for CHD [relative excess risk interaction (RERI) = 0.081, attributable proportion of interaction (AP) = 0.046, synergy index (SI) = 1.117], angina pectoris [RERI = 0.112, AP = 0.055, SI = 1.121], and MI [RERI = 0.183, AP = 0.079, SI = 1.161], with MI showing the strongest synergy. Incorporating PRS further amplified these effects, and the RERI [CHD: RERI = 0.721; angina pectoris: RERI = 0.781; MI: RERI = 1.318] and SI [CHD: SI = 2.218; angina pectoris: SI = 1.97; MI: SI = 2.326)] were significantly higher than those of the interaction model containing only Lp(a) and LDL-C. In conclusion, Lp(a) and LDL-C show a significant synergistic effect in ASCVD, and this effect is more prominent in individuals with a higher PRS, suggesting that dual lipid management should be strengthened for such populations. While AF and HF may require alternative risk factor management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高密度脂蛋白(a) (Lp(a))是公认的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的独立危险因素。然而,Lp(a)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和多基因风险评分(PRS)在心血管疾病中的相互作用一直是相对有限的研究主题。目前的研究包括来自英国生物银行的346,751名参与者。根据Lp(a)指南,将研究对象分为三组:第一组< 75 mmol/L (n = 272,643),第二组75 - 125 mmol/L (n = 35,792),第三组> 125 mmol/L (n = 38,316)。Lp(a)水平升高与总体心血管事件(cve)的风险逐渐增加相关,包括缺血性卒中(IS)、冠心病(CHD)、心绞痛和心肌梗死(MI)。相反,随着Lp(a)水平的升高,房颤(AF)和心力衰竭(HF)的风险降低。添加剂之间的相互作用分析显示显著的协同效应Lp (a)和低密度脂蛋白对冠心病(相对过剩风险相互作用(RERI) = 0.081,由于比例的交互(美联社) = 0.046,协同指数(SI) = 1.117],心绞痛(RERI = 0.112,美联社 = 0.055,如果 = 1.121],和MI (RERI = 0.183,美联社 = 0.079,如果 = 1.161],MI显示最强的协同作用。纳入PRS进一步放大了这些影响,而rei [CHD: rei = 0.721;心绞痛:rei = 0.781;MI: rei = 1.318]和SI [CHD: SI = 2.218];心绞痛:SI = 1.97;MI: SI = 2.326)]显著高于仅含有Lp(a)和LDL-C的相互作用模型。综上所述,Lp(a)和LDL-C在ASCVD中表现出显著的协同作用,且这种作用在PRS较高的个体中更为突出,提示应加强此类人群的双重脂质管理。而房颤和心衰可能需要其他风险因素管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Lipoprotein(a) in Cardiovascular Risk Stratification: IntegratingLow-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Polygenic Risk Scores.

High-density lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a well-established independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). However, the interaction between Lp(a), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and polygenic risk score (PRS) in cardiovascular diseases has been the subject of relatively limited research. The present study included a total of 346,751 participants from the UK Biobank. According to the guideline of Lp(a), the study subjects were divided into three groups: the first group was < 75 mmol/L (n = 272,643), the second group was 75 - 125 mmol/L (n = 35,792), and the third group was > 125 mmol/L (n = 38,316). Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with a progressively increased risk of overall cardiovascular events (CVEs), including ischemic stroke (IS), coronary heart disease (CHD), angina pectoris, and myocardial infarction (MI). In contrast, the risks of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) decreased with higher Lp(a) levels. Additive interaction analyses revealed significant synergistic effects between Lp(a) and LDL-C for CHD [relative excess risk interaction (RERI) = 0.081, attributable proportion of interaction (AP) = 0.046, synergy index (SI) = 1.117], angina pectoris [RERI = 0.112, AP = 0.055, SI = 1.121], and MI [RERI = 0.183, AP = 0.079, SI = 1.161], with MI showing the strongest synergy. Incorporating PRS further amplified these effects, and the RERI [CHD: RERI = 0.721; angina pectoris: RERI = 0.781; MI: RERI = 1.318] and SI [CHD: SI = 2.218; angina pectoris: SI = 1.97; MI: SI = 2.326)] were significantly higher than those of the interaction model containing only Lp(a) and LDL-C. In conclusion, Lp(a) and LDL-C show a significant synergistic effect in ASCVD, and this effect is more prominent in individuals with a higher PRS, suggesting that dual lipid management should be strengthened for such populations. While AF and HF may require alternative risk factor management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信