胺碘酮对左房结构和功能的影响:AMIO-CAT试验。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Flemming Javier Olsen, Stine Darkner, Xu Chen, Steen Pehrson, Arne Johannessen, Jim Hansen, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Tor Biering-Sørensen
{"title":"胺碘酮对左房结构和功能的影响:AMIO-CAT试验。","authors":"Flemming Javier Olsen, Stine Darkner, Xu Chen, Steen Pehrson, Arne Johannessen, Jim Hansen, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Tor Biering-Sørensen","doi":"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Catheter ablation (CA) is commonly used to obtain rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), yet AF recurrence is frequent. In this study, we hypothesized that measures of left atrial (LA) structure and function modified the treatment effect of amiodarone to prevent AF recurrence, which has otherwise not proven beneficial. This was a post-hoc analysis of the double-blinded AMIO-CAT trial. Patients undergoing CA were randomized to short-term amiodarone treatment or placebo. All patients underwent echocardiography to assess LA volumes and strain. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence at 6-months. Secondary endpoints were cardioversion and AF-related hospitalization during follow-up. Of 212 patients, 108 were randomized to amiodarone and 104 to placebo. 206 patients were eligible for analyses of the primary endpoint, of whom 90 (44%) developed AF recurrence. No measure of LA size or function significantly modified the effect of amiodarone for preventing AF recurrence (p for interaction>0.05 for all measures). However, abnormal LA strain (<22.7%) significantly modified the treatment effect for the secondary outcomes of cardioversions (p for interaction=0.013) and AF-related hospitalization (p for interaction=0.014). In patients with abnormal LA strain, amiodarone significantly reduced the risk of cardioversions (OR 0.35 (0.15-0.80), p=0.013) and AF-related hospitalization (OR 0.31 (0.14-0.73), p=0.007) compared to placebo. In conclusion, LA measures did not modify the treatment effect of amiodarone vs. placebo for preventing AF recurrence at 6 months in patients undergoing CA. However, in patients with abnormal LA strain, amiodarone may reduce cardioversions and AF-related hospitalizations as compared to placebo. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov unique identifier: NCT00826826.</p>","PeriodicalId":7705,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Amiodarone after Catheter Ablation According to Left Atrial Structure and Function: The AMIO-CAT Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Flemming Javier Olsen, Stine Darkner, Xu Chen, Steen Pehrson, Arne Johannessen, Jim Hansen, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen, Tor Biering-Sørensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Catheter ablation (CA) is commonly used to obtain rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), yet AF recurrence is frequent. In this study, we hypothesized that measures of left atrial (LA) structure and function modified the treatment effect of amiodarone to prevent AF recurrence, which has otherwise not proven beneficial. This was a post-hoc analysis of the double-blinded AMIO-CAT trial. Patients undergoing CA were randomized to short-term amiodarone treatment or placebo. All patients underwent echocardiography to assess LA volumes and strain. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence at 6-months. Secondary endpoints were cardioversion and AF-related hospitalization during follow-up. Of 212 patients, 108 were randomized to amiodarone and 104 to placebo. 206 patients were eligible for analyses of the primary endpoint, of whom 90 (44%) developed AF recurrence. No measure of LA size or function significantly modified the effect of amiodarone for preventing AF recurrence (p for interaction>0.05 for all measures). However, abnormal LA strain (<22.7%) significantly modified the treatment effect for the secondary outcomes of cardioversions (p for interaction=0.013) and AF-related hospitalization (p for interaction=0.014). In patients with abnormal LA strain, amiodarone significantly reduced the risk of cardioversions (OR 0.35 (0.15-0.80), p=0.013) and AF-related hospitalization (OR 0.31 (0.14-0.73), p=0.007) compared to placebo. In conclusion, LA measures did not modify the treatment effect of amiodarone vs. placebo for preventing AF recurrence at 6 months in patients undergoing CA. However, in patients with abnormal LA strain, amiodarone may reduce cardioversions and AF-related hospitalizations as compared to placebo. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov unique identifier: NCT00826826.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.017\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2025.09.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导管消融(CA)是房颤(AF)患者常用的心律控制手段,但房颤的复发率较高。在本研究中,我们假设左心房(LA)结构和功能的测量改变了胺碘酮预防房颤复发的治疗效果,否则没有证明有益。这是双盲AMIO-CAT试验的事后分析。接受CA治疗的患者随机分为短期胺碘酮治疗组和安慰剂组。所有患者均行超声心动图评估左心室容积和应变。主要终点是6个月时房颤复发。次要终点是随访期间的心律转复和房颤相关住院。212名患者中,108名随机接受胺碘酮治疗,104名随机接受安慰剂治疗。206例患者符合主要终点分析的条件,其中90例(44%)发生房颤复发。LA大小或功能的测量没有显著改变胺碘酮预防房颤复发的效果(所有测量的相互作用p < 0.05)。然而,异常LA菌株(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Amiodarone after Catheter Ablation According to Left Atrial Structure and Function: The AMIO-CAT Trial.

Catheter ablation (CA) is commonly used to obtain rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), yet AF recurrence is frequent. In this study, we hypothesized that measures of left atrial (LA) structure and function modified the treatment effect of amiodarone to prevent AF recurrence, which has otherwise not proven beneficial. This was a post-hoc analysis of the double-blinded AMIO-CAT trial. Patients undergoing CA were randomized to short-term amiodarone treatment or placebo. All patients underwent echocardiography to assess LA volumes and strain. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence at 6-months. Secondary endpoints were cardioversion and AF-related hospitalization during follow-up. Of 212 patients, 108 were randomized to amiodarone and 104 to placebo. 206 patients were eligible for analyses of the primary endpoint, of whom 90 (44%) developed AF recurrence. No measure of LA size or function significantly modified the effect of amiodarone for preventing AF recurrence (p for interaction>0.05 for all measures). However, abnormal LA strain (<22.7%) significantly modified the treatment effect for the secondary outcomes of cardioversions (p for interaction=0.013) and AF-related hospitalization (p for interaction=0.014). In patients with abnormal LA strain, amiodarone significantly reduced the risk of cardioversions (OR 0.35 (0.15-0.80), p=0.013) and AF-related hospitalization (OR 0.31 (0.14-0.73), p=0.007) compared to placebo. In conclusion, LA measures did not modify the treatment effect of amiodarone vs. placebo for preventing AF recurrence at 6 months in patients undergoing CA. However, in patients with abnormal LA strain, amiodarone may reduce cardioversions and AF-related hospitalizations as compared to placebo. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov unique identifier: NCT00826826.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Cardiology
American Journal of Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
698
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Published 24 times a year, The American Journal of Cardiology® is an independent journal designed for cardiovascular disease specialists and internists with a subspecialty in cardiology throughout the world. AJC is an independent, scientific, peer-reviewed journal of original articles that focus on the practical, clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. AJC has one of the fastest acceptance to publication times in Cardiology. Features report on systemic hypertension, methodology, drugs, pacing, arrhythmia, preventive cardiology, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy. Also included are editorials, readers'' comments, and symposia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信