洪水脉冲生态效益机理与平衡生态风险评价框架

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Yujie Cai, Yuqing Chang, Xinhua Zhang, Li Wan, Zhurui Gao, Jiannan Zhang, Yasmina Tir, Yijun Guo
{"title":"洪水脉冲生态效益机理与平衡生态风险评价框架","authors":"Yujie Cai, Yuqing Chang, Xinhua Zhang, Li Wan, Zhurui Gao, Jiannan Zhang, Yasmina Tir, Yijun Guo","doi":"10.1007/s00267-025-02288-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Climate change has significantly intensified flood regimes in recent decades. While traditional flood management emphasizes disaster prevention through structural interventions, it often overlooks the ecological functions of flood pulses. This study first explores how flood frequency and phases affect riverine habitat quality, integrating two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling with ecological habitat assessment. Using the Qingyi River as a case study, we quantified the habitat responses of multiple aquatic organisms under different flood frequencies and different hydrological stages. Results show that moderate floods (with a 10-year return period) enhanced fish habitat functionality (Weighted Usable Area, WUA) by up to 120% compared to multi-year average discharge, primarily by expanding shallow zones and improving lateral connectivity. Fish species reached peak habitat suitability during flood crests, while Benthic organisms favored recession phases, revealing phase-specific ecological responses. To further account for flood risks-often neglected in ecological evaluations-we introduced a Flood Assessment Method Coupling Ecology and Risk (FAMCER) and in this method we proposed the Flood Efficiency Index (FEI) to integrate ecological gains and hazard costs. This index identifies trade-offs between ecological benefits and flood risks, showing that 10-year floods achieve an optimal balance in our case study. The flexible FEI-based framework enables targeted evaluation across different conservation priorities and supports adaptive decision-making for ecological flow releases and floodplain restoration. These findings highlight the need to shift from purely defensive flood control to integrated flood management that balances ecological enhancement with risk mitigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanistic Insights into Flood Pulse-Induced Ecological Benefits and a Balanced Eco-Risk Assessment Framework.\",\"authors\":\"Yujie Cai, Yuqing Chang, Xinhua Zhang, Li Wan, Zhurui Gao, Jiannan Zhang, Yasmina Tir, Yijun Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00267-025-02288-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Climate change has significantly intensified flood regimes in recent decades. While traditional flood management emphasizes disaster prevention through structural interventions, it often overlooks the ecological functions of flood pulses. This study first explores how flood frequency and phases affect riverine habitat quality, integrating two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling with ecological habitat assessment. Using the Qingyi River as a case study, we quantified the habitat responses of multiple aquatic organisms under different flood frequencies and different hydrological stages. Results show that moderate floods (with a 10-year return period) enhanced fish habitat functionality (Weighted Usable Area, WUA) by up to 120% compared to multi-year average discharge, primarily by expanding shallow zones and improving lateral connectivity. Fish species reached peak habitat suitability during flood crests, while Benthic organisms favored recession phases, revealing phase-specific ecological responses. To further account for flood risks-often neglected in ecological evaluations-we introduced a Flood Assessment Method Coupling Ecology and Risk (FAMCER) and in this method we proposed the Flood Efficiency Index (FEI) to integrate ecological gains and hazard costs. This index identifies trade-offs between ecological benefits and flood risks, showing that 10-year floods achieve an optimal balance in our case study. The flexible FEI-based framework enables targeted evaluation across different conservation priorities and supports adaptive decision-making for ecological flow releases and floodplain restoration. These findings highlight the need to shift from purely defensive flood control to integrated flood management that balances ecological enhancement with risk mitigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02288-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-025-02288-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,气候变化显著加剧了洪水状况。传统的洪水管理强调通过结构性干预来预防灾害,往往忽视了洪水脉冲的生态功能。本研究首先将二维水动力模型与生态栖息地评价相结合,探讨了洪水频率和汛期对河流生境质量的影响。以青衣河为例,量化了不同洪水频率和不同水文阶段下多种水生生物的栖息地响应。结果表明,与多年平均流量相比,中度洪水(10年复发期)通过扩大浅层带和改善横向连通性,使鱼类栖息地功能(加权可用面积,WUA)提高了120%。鱼类生境适宜性在洪峰期达到峰值,底栖生物生境适宜性在退潮期达到峰值,揭示了不同阶段的生态响应。为了进一步考虑在生态评估中经常被忽视的洪水风险,我们引入了一种耦合生态和风险的洪水评估方法(famer),并在该方法中提出了洪水效率指数(FEI)来综合生态收益和灾害成本。该指数确定了生态效益和洪水风险之间的权衡,表明在我们的案例研究中,10年洪水达到了最佳平衡。灵活的基于fei的框架能够针对不同的保护优先级进行有针对性的评估,并支持生态流量释放和洪泛平原恢复的适应性决策。这些发现强调了从纯粹的防御性洪水控制转向综合洪水管理的必要性,以平衡生态增强与风险缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanistic Insights into Flood Pulse-Induced Ecological Benefits and a Balanced Eco-Risk Assessment Framework.

Climate change has significantly intensified flood regimes in recent decades. While traditional flood management emphasizes disaster prevention through structural interventions, it often overlooks the ecological functions of flood pulses. This study first explores how flood frequency and phases affect riverine habitat quality, integrating two-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling with ecological habitat assessment. Using the Qingyi River as a case study, we quantified the habitat responses of multiple aquatic organisms under different flood frequencies and different hydrological stages. Results show that moderate floods (with a 10-year return period) enhanced fish habitat functionality (Weighted Usable Area, WUA) by up to 120% compared to multi-year average discharge, primarily by expanding shallow zones and improving lateral connectivity. Fish species reached peak habitat suitability during flood crests, while Benthic organisms favored recession phases, revealing phase-specific ecological responses. To further account for flood risks-often neglected in ecological evaluations-we introduced a Flood Assessment Method Coupling Ecology and Risk (FAMCER) and in this method we proposed the Flood Efficiency Index (FEI) to integrate ecological gains and hazard costs. This index identifies trade-offs between ecological benefits and flood risks, showing that 10-year floods achieve an optimal balance in our case study. The flexible FEI-based framework enables targeted evaluation across different conservation priorities and supports adaptive decision-making for ecological flow releases and floodplain restoration. These findings highlight the need to shift from purely defensive flood control to integrated flood management that balances ecological enhancement with risk mitigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信