Madison Strain, Melanie E. Garrett, Max Bucklan, Joan M. Jasien, Gordon Worley, Joseph G. Gleeson, Allison E. Ashley-Koch
{"title":"测序分析表明,复杂的遗传结构增加了脊柱裂的风险","authors":"Madison Strain, Melanie E. Garrett, Max Bucklan, Joan M. Jasien, Gordon Worley, Joseph G. Gleeson, Allison E. Ashley-Koch","doi":"10.1002/bdr2.2533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Spina bifida (SB), a common neural tube defects (NTDs), has a complex genetic architecture that remains incompletely understood. Although prior studies have identified rare, deleterious single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in SB, broader contributions to risk remain unclear. Here, we investigated shared genetic risk among 256 SB probands compared with 395 ancestry-matched controls using an unbiased sequencing approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed an exome-wide association study (ExWAS) of 46,887 SNVs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) > 0.001 to identify single-variant associations, followed by gene-based burden tests to assess the cumulative effect of SNVs within genes, using all variants and then restricting to rare variants (MAF < 0.05). Both burden tests were repeated in 510 unaffected parents to evaluate excess mutational burden relative to controls.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across all analyses, 16 genes were associated with SB: <i>SRCIN1</i>, <i>PDE4DIP</i>, <i>XCL2</i>, <i>CTAGE10P</i>, <i>GLB1L3</i>, <i>PMS2P4</i>, <i>HSPA4</i>, <i>GLB1L2</i>, <i>FAM90A1</i>, <i>PLA1A</i>, <i>HLA-A</i>, <i>SPIRE2</i>, <i>TVP23B</i>, <i>CHD5</i>, <i>FOXA2</i>, and <i>PIF1</i>. ExWAS identified 11 significant SNVs, nine of which were common (MAF > 0.05). The unrestricted burden test identified seven genes; four remained significant when restricted to rare variants, and two additional genes emerged only in that subset. Five burden-associated genes were not detected in the ExWAS, suggesting cumulative variant effects. Four burden-associated genes also showed enrichment in parents, supporting inherited risk. Three of these showed suggestive transmission disequilibrium (<i>p</i> values ≤ 0.10) and one was attributed to multiple SNVs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>These results provide new insight into the multifactorial genetic landscape of SB and highlight the importance of unbiased approaches in constructing genetic models of NTD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9121,"journal":{"name":"Birth Defects Research","volume":"117 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequencing Analysis Demonstrates That a Complex Genetic Architecture Contributes to Risk for Spina Bifida\",\"authors\":\"Madison Strain, Melanie E. Garrett, Max Bucklan, Joan M. Jasien, Gordon Worley, Joseph G. Gleeson, Allison E. Ashley-Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bdr2.2533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Spina bifida (SB), a common neural tube defects (NTDs), has a complex genetic architecture that remains incompletely understood. Although prior studies have identified rare, deleterious single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in SB, broader contributions to risk remain unclear. Here, we investigated shared genetic risk among 256 SB probands compared with 395 ancestry-matched controls using an unbiased sequencing approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed an exome-wide association study (ExWAS) of 46,887 SNVs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) > 0.001 to identify single-variant associations, followed by gene-based burden tests to assess the cumulative effect of SNVs within genes, using all variants and then restricting to rare variants (MAF < 0.05). Both burden tests were repeated in 510 unaffected parents to evaluate excess mutational burden relative to controls.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Across all analyses, 16 genes were associated with SB: <i>SRCIN1</i>, <i>PDE4DIP</i>, <i>XCL2</i>, <i>CTAGE10P</i>, <i>GLB1L3</i>, <i>PMS2P4</i>, <i>HSPA4</i>, <i>GLB1L2</i>, <i>FAM90A1</i>, <i>PLA1A</i>, <i>HLA-A</i>, <i>SPIRE2</i>, <i>TVP23B</i>, <i>CHD5</i>, <i>FOXA2</i>, and <i>PIF1</i>. ExWAS identified 11 significant SNVs, nine of which were common (MAF > 0.05). The unrestricted burden test identified seven genes; four remained significant when restricted to rare variants, and two additional genes emerged only in that subset. Five burden-associated genes were not detected in the ExWAS, suggesting cumulative variant effects. Four burden-associated genes also showed enrichment in parents, supporting inherited risk. Three of these showed suggestive transmission disequilibrium (<i>p</i> values ≤ 0.10) and one was attributed to multiple SNVs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These results provide new insight into the multifactorial genetic landscape of SB and highlight the importance of unbiased approaches in constructing genetic models of NTD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Birth Defects Research\",\"volume\":\"117 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Birth Defects Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2533\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Birth Defects Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bdr2.2533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sequencing Analysis Demonstrates That a Complex Genetic Architecture Contributes to Risk for Spina Bifida
Background
Spina bifida (SB), a common neural tube defects (NTDs), has a complex genetic architecture that remains incompletely understood. Although prior studies have identified rare, deleterious single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in SB, broader contributions to risk remain unclear. Here, we investigated shared genetic risk among 256 SB probands compared with 395 ancestry-matched controls using an unbiased sequencing approach.
Methods
We performed an exome-wide association study (ExWAS) of 46,887 SNVs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) > 0.001 to identify single-variant associations, followed by gene-based burden tests to assess the cumulative effect of SNVs within genes, using all variants and then restricting to rare variants (MAF < 0.05). Both burden tests were repeated in 510 unaffected parents to evaluate excess mutational burden relative to controls.
Results
Across all analyses, 16 genes were associated with SB: SRCIN1, PDE4DIP, XCL2, CTAGE10P, GLB1L3, PMS2P4, HSPA4, GLB1L2, FAM90A1, PLA1A, HLA-A, SPIRE2, TVP23B, CHD5, FOXA2, and PIF1. ExWAS identified 11 significant SNVs, nine of which were common (MAF > 0.05). The unrestricted burden test identified seven genes; four remained significant when restricted to rare variants, and two additional genes emerged only in that subset. Five burden-associated genes were not detected in the ExWAS, suggesting cumulative variant effects. Four burden-associated genes also showed enrichment in parents, supporting inherited risk. Three of these showed suggestive transmission disequilibrium (p values ≤ 0.10) and one was attributed to multiple SNVs.
Conclusion
These results provide new insight into the multifactorial genetic landscape of SB and highlight the importance of unbiased approaches in constructing genetic models of NTD.
期刊介绍:
The journal Birth Defects Research publishes original research and reviews in areas related to the etiology of adverse developmental and reproductive outcome. In particular the journal is devoted to the publication of original scientific research that contributes to the understanding of the biology of embryonic development and the prenatal causative factors and mechanisms leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes, namely structural and functional birth defects, pregnancy loss, postnatal functional defects in the human population, and to the identification of prenatal factors and biological mechanisms that reduce these risks.
Adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes may have genetic, environmental, nutritional or epigenetic causes. Accordingly, the journal Birth Defects Research takes an integrated, multidisciplinary approach in its organization and publication strategy. The journal Birth Defects Research contains separate sections for clinical and molecular teratology, developmental and reproductive toxicology, and reviews in developmental biology to acknowledge and accommodate the integrative nature of research in this field. Each section has a dedicated editor who is a leader in his/her field and who has full editorial authority in his/her area.