相对泥沙供给和过量剪应力驱动了河道修复侧河道的演化

IF 2.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Rocko A. Brown, Jared G. Stieve, Kirsten Sellheim, Joseph Merz
{"title":"相对泥沙供给和过量剪应力驱动了河道修复侧河道的演化","authors":"Rocko A. Brown,&nbsp;Jared G. Stieve,&nbsp;Kirsten Sellheim,&nbsp;Joseph Merz","doi":"10.1002/esp.70165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Side channel restoration—including creation, rehabilitation and enhancement—is a common strategy to mitigate habitat degradation in regulated rivers. While short-term ecological benefits are well documented, the longer-term geomorphic evolution of restored side channels remains less understood. In natural systems, side channels typically occur at dynamic bifurcations influenced by slope and sediment supply, whereas restoration efforts in regulated rivers often prioritize static design targets (e.g., a fixed inundation area at a given flow). We monitored two restored side channels along a regulated river in California over a five-year period to investigate how geomorphic and habitat conditions evolve post-restoration. Our objectives were to (1) document geomorphic and habitat changes and (2) assess how excess shear stress and relative sediment supply influence channel evolution. We tracked changes in sediment and large wood budgets, bed profiles, grain size distributions, bar formation, inundation patterns and tracer rock displacement and interpreted these in the context of reach-scale and geomorphic-scale shear stress. Results show that the steeper, upstream site experienced greater erosion and a loss of low-flow inundation area due to higher flow energy and excess shear stress, while the downstream site remained relatively stable and gained inundated habitat. Importantly, reach-scale excess shear stress served as an effective proxy for relative sediment supply, explaining observed differences in geomorphic response between sites. Both channels lost more large wood than they recruited, highlighting the need for integrated sediment and wood management. Normalized rates of geomorphic change declined over time, suggesting that the primary morphological adjustments occurred shortly after construction. These findings underscore the importance of reach-scale context in designing and evaluating side channel restoration and demonstrate how multi-scalar monitoring—particularly incorporating reach-scale excess shear stress—can improve understanding of post-restoration dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"50 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative sediment supply and excess shear stress drives the evolution of restored side channels in a regulated river\",\"authors\":\"Rocko A. Brown,&nbsp;Jared G. Stieve,&nbsp;Kirsten Sellheim,&nbsp;Joseph Merz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/esp.70165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Side channel restoration—including creation, rehabilitation and enhancement—is a common strategy to mitigate habitat degradation in regulated rivers. While short-term ecological benefits are well documented, the longer-term geomorphic evolution of restored side channels remains less understood. In natural systems, side channels typically occur at dynamic bifurcations influenced by slope and sediment supply, whereas restoration efforts in regulated rivers often prioritize static design targets (e.g., a fixed inundation area at a given flow). We monitored two restored side channels along a regulated river in California over a five-year period to investigate how geomorphic and habitat conditions evolve post-restoration. Our objectives were to (1) document geomorphic and habitat changes and (2) assess how excess shear stress and relative sediment supply influence channel evolution. We tracked changes in sediment and large wood budgets, bed profiles, grain size distributions, bar formation, inundation patterns and tracer rock displacement and interpreted these in the context of reach-scale and geomorphic-scale shear stress. Results show that the steeper, upstream site experienced greater erosion and a loss of low-flow inundation area due to higher flow energy and excess shear stress, while the downstream site remained relatively stable and gained inundated habitat. Importantly, reach-scale excess shear stress served as an effective proxy for relative sediment supply, explaining observed differences in geomorphic response between sites. Both channels lost more large wood than they recruited, highlighting the need for integrated sediment and wood management. Normalized rates of geomorphic change declined over time, suggesting that the primary morphological adjustments occurred shortly after construction. These findings underscore the importance of reach-scale context in designing and evaluating side channel restoration and demonstrate how multi-scalar monitoring—particularly incorporating reach-scale excess shear stress—can improve understanding of post-restoration dynamics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms\",\"volume\":\"50 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70165\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.70165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

侧河道修复——包括新建、修复和改善——是缓解受管制河流栖息地退化的常用策略。虽然短期的生态效益已得到充分证明,但修复后的侧河道的长期地貌演变仍鲜为人知。在自然系统中,侧河道通常发生在受坡度和泥沙供应影响的动态分叉处,而在受调节的河流中,修复工作往往优先考虑静态设计目标(例如,在给定流量下的固定淹没区域)。我们在五年的时间里监测了加利福尼亚州一条受管制河流沿线的两条修复后的侧河道,以研究修复后的地貌和栖息地条件如何演变。我们的目标是:(1)记录地貌和栖息地的变化;(2)评估过度剪应力和相对沉积物供应如何影响河道演变。我们跟踪了沉积物和大木材储量、河床剖面、粒度分布、沙洲形成、淹没模式和示踪岩石位移的变化,并在河段尺度和地貌尺度剪切应力的背景下对这些变化进行了解释。结果表明,坡度较大的上游遗址由于水流能和超剪应力的作用,遭受了更大的侵蚀和低流量淹没面积的损失,而下游遗址则保持了相对稳定并获得了淹没栖息地。重要的是,河尺度超额剪应力作为相对沉积物供应的有效代理,解释了观察到的不同地点之间地貌响应的差异。两个渠道损失的大木材都比吸收的多,这突出了综合沉积物和木材管理的必要性。标准化的地貌变化率随着时间的推移而下降,这表明主要的形态调整发生在建设后不久。这些发现强调了河段尺度环境在设计和评估侧河道修复中的重要性,并证明了多尺度监测(特别是纳入河段尺度的过量剪应力)如何提高对修复后动态的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Relative sediment supply and excess shear stress drives the evolution of restored side channels in a regulated river

Relative sediment supply and excess shear stress drives the evolution of restored side channels in a regulated river

Side channel restoration—including creation, rehabilitation and enhancement—is a common strategy to mitigate habitat degradation in regulated rivers. While short-term ecological benefits are well documented, the longer-term geomorphic evolution of restored side channels remains less understood. In natural systems, side channels typically occur at dynamic bifurcations influenced by slope and sediment supply, whereas restoration efforts in regulated rivers often prioritize static design targets (e.g., a fixed inundation area at a given flow). We monitored two restored side channels along a regulated river in California over a five-year period to investigate how geomorphic and habitat conditions evolve post-restoration. Our objectives were to (1) document geomorphic and habitat changes and (2) assess how excess shear stress and relative sediment supply influence channel evolution. We tracked changes in sediment and large wood budgets, bed profiles, grain size distributions, bar formation, inundation patterns and tracer rock displacement and interpreted these in the context of reach-scale and geomorphic-scale shear stress. Results show that the steeper, upstream site experienced greater erosion and a loss of low-flow inundation area due to higher flow energy and excess shear stress, while the downstream site remained relatively stable and gained inundated habitat. Importantly, reach-scale excess shear stress served as an effective proxy for relative sediment supply, explaining observed differences in geomorphic response between sites. Both channels lost more large wood than they recruited, highlighting the need for integrated sediment and wood management. Normalized rates of geomorphic change declined over time, suggesting that the primary morphological adjustments occurred shortly after construction. These findings underscore the importance of reach-scale context in designing and evaluating side channel restoration and demonstrate how multi-scalar monitoring—particularly incorporating reach-scale excess shear stress—can improve understanding of post-restoration dynamics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信