火灾条件下钢筋混凝土梁的热力学分析:常规混凝土与超高性能混凝土的比较

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
F. S. Duarte, R. Carrazedo, J. Munaiar Neto
{"title":"火灾条件下钢筋混凝土梁的热力学分析:常规混凝土与超高性能混凝土的比较","authors":"F. S. Duarte,&nbsp;R. Carrazedo,&nbsp;J. Munaiar Neto","doi":"10.1007/s10694-024-01657-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) is known for its remarkable durability and strength, owing to its dense microstructure. However, its reduced porosity poses challenges when exposed to high temperatures, making it vulnerable to fire damage compared to conventional concrete. This paper presents thermomechanical numerical simulations of reinforced concrete beams, focusing on understanding the behavior of UHPC and conventional concrete under elevated temperatures. We employed the software ABAQUS and validated thermomechanical properties obtained by experimental tests without occurrence of spalling available on literature. Beams with equivalent strength were modeled, subjected to mechanical loads, and heated following the ISO 834 fire curve. A parametric study was conducted to investigate the influence of the applied load level, concrete cover and compression strength on the behavior of the UHPC. Results showed that UHPC beams heated up significantly faster, reaching temperatures <span>\\(\\hbox {182}\\,^{\\circ }\\)</span>C higher than conventional concrete beams after 180 min. This faster heating leads to greater displacements and reduced fire resistance, with UHPC beams achieving about 30 min less of resistance. However, further experimental research is recommended to confirm these results and refine the properties of UHPC. From the parametric analyses, we observed that improving the concrete’s strength led to a resistance increase of only up to 5%. Improved results were achieved with the addition of concrete cover. With load increases of 15% and 25%, the resistance decreased by 17.2% and 27.1%, respectively. These results emphasize the importance of considering concrete type in fire safety design, allowing for the definition of appropriate parameters for fire safety standards.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":558,"journal":{"name":"Fire Technology","volume":"61 4","pages":"1647 - 1668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermomechanical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Fire Situation: A Comparison Between Conventional Concrete and UHPC\",\"authors\":\"F. S. Duarte,&nbsp;R. Carrazedo,&nbsp;J. Munaiar Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10694-024-01657-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) is known for its remarkable durability and strength, owing to its dense microstructure. However, its reduced porosity poses challenges when exposed to high temperatures, making it vulnerable to fire damage compared to conventional concrete. This paper presents thermomechanical numerical simulations of reinforced concrete beams, focusing on understanding the behavior of UHPC and conventional concrete under elevated temperatures. We employed the software ABAQUS and validated thermomechanical properties obtained by experimental tests without occurrence of spalling available on literature. Beams with equivalent strength were modeled, subjected to mechanical loads, and heated following the ISO 834 fire curve. A parametric study was conducted to investigate the influence of the applied load level, concrete cover and compression strength on the behavior of the UHPC. Results showed that UHPC beams heated up significantly faster, reaching temperatures <span>\\\\(\\\\hbox {182}\\\\,^{\\\\circ }\\\\)</span>C higher than conventional concrete beams after 180 min. This faster heating leads to greater displacements and reduced fire resistance, with UHPC beams achieving about 30 min less of resistance. However, further experimental research is recommended to confirm these results and refine the properties of UHPC. From the parametric analyses, we observed that improving the concrete’s strength led to a resistance increase of only up to 5%. Improved results were achieved with the addition of concrete cover. With load increases of 15% and 25%, the resistance decreased by 17.2% and 27.1%, respectively. These results emphasize the importance of considering concrete type in fire safety design, allowing for the definition of appropriate parameters for fire safety standards.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Technology\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"1647 - 1668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-024-01657-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-024-01657-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

超高性能混凝土(UHPC)因其致密的微观结构而具有卓越的耐久性和强度。然而,当暴露在高温下时,它的孔隙率降低会带来挑战,与传统混凝土相比,它容易受到火灾的破坏。本文介绍了钢筋混凝土梁的热力学数值模拟,重点了解了高温下UHPC和普通混凝土的性能。采用ABAQUS软件对实验所得的热力学性能进行了验证,没有出现文献记载的剥落现象。具有等效强度的梁建模,承受机械载荷,并按照ISO 834火灾曲线加热。通过参数化研究,探讨了施加荷载水平、混凝土覆盖层和抗压强度对UHPC性能的影响。结果表明,UHPC梁的升温速度明显快于常规混凝土梁,在180 min后达到的温度比常规混凝土梁高\(\hbox {182}\,^{\circ }\)℃。这种更快的加热导致更大的位移和降低的耐火性,与UHPC梁实现约30分钟的阻力减少。然而,建议进一步的实验研究来证实这些结果并完善UHPC的性能。从参数分析,我们观察到,提高混凝土的强度导致阻力增加只有5%. Improved results were achieved with the addition of concrete cover. With load increases of 15% and 25%, the resistance decreased by 17.2% and 27.1%, respectively. These results emphasize the importance of considering concrete type in fire safety design, allowing for the definition of appropriate parameters for fire safety standards.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Thermomechanical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Fire Situation: A Comparison Between Conventional Concrete and UHPC

Thermomechanical Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Fire Situation: A Comparison Between Conventional Concrete and UHPC

Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) is known for its remarkable durability and strength, owing to its dense microstructure. However, its reduced porosity poses challenges when exposed to high temperatures, making it vulnerable to fire damage compared to conventional concrete. This paper presents thermomechanical numerical simulations of reinforced concrete beams, focusing on understanding the behavior of UHPC and conventional concrete under elevated temperatures. We employed the software ABAQUS and validated thermomechanical properties obtained by experimental tests without occurrence of spalling available on literature. Beams with equivalent strength were modeled, subjected to mechanical loads, and heated following the ISO 834 fire curve. A parametric study was conducted to investigate the influence of the applied load level, concrete cover and compression strength on the behavior of the UHPC. Results showed that UHPC beams heated up significantly faster, reaching temperatures \(\hbox {182}\,^{\circ }\)C higher than conventional concrete beams after 180 min. This faster heating leads to greater displacements and reduced fire resistance, with UHPC beams achieving about 30 min less of resistance. However, further experimental research is recommended to confirm these results and refine the properties of UHPC. From the parametric analyses, we observed that improving the concrete’s strength led to a resistance increase of only up to 5%. Improved results were achieved with the addition of concrete cover. With load increases of 15% and 25%, the resistance decreased by 17.2% and 27.1%, respectively. These results emphasize the importance of considering concrete type in fire safety design, allowing for the definition of appropriate parameters for fire safety standards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Technology
Fire Technology 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Fire Technology publishes original contributions, both theoretical and empirical, that contribute to the solution of problems in fire safety science and engineering. It is the leading journal in the field, publishing applied research dealing with the full range of actual and potential fire hazards facing humans and the environment. It covers the entire domain of fire safety science and engineering problems relevant in industrial, operational, cultural, and environmental applications, including modeling, testing, detection, suppression, human behavior, wildfires, structures, and risk analysis. The aim of Fire Technology is to push forward the frontiers of knowledge and technology by encouraging interdisciplinary communication of significant technical developments in fire protection and subjects of scientific interest to the fire protection community at large. It is published in conjunction with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE). The mission of NFPA is to help save lives and reduce loss with information, knowledge, and passion. The mission of SFPE is advancing the science and practice of fire protection engineering internationally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信