{"title":"探讨在线测试中反馈时间对学生表现的影响","authors":"Guozhu Ding, Mailin Li, Shan Li, Hao Wu","doi":"10.1007/s12564-024-10024-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the effect of feedback intervals on student performance. A pre-experimental study with 36 students was conducted to determine the delayed time for providing feedback based on student behavioral data. A formal experiment with 80 students was then conducted to explore the joint effects of feedback interventions and task difficulty on student performance improvement. The findings revealed that feedback conditions had no significant impact on student learning gains in easy or difficult tasks. However, for medium difficulty tasks, feedback delays of 23 and 30 s led to greater academic improvement compared to immediate feedback, while feedback with a 35-s delay resulted in worse performance. Overall, the study highlights the importance of considering task difficulty when determining optimal feedback intervals and suggests that well-timed feedback can significantly enhance student learning, especially for tasks of moderate complexity. This challenges the common practice of providing immediate feedback, which may not always be optimal. Moreover, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for educators and instructional designers when designing online assessments and feedback mechanisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":"26 2","pages":"303 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the impact of feedback timing on student performance in online testing\",\"authors\":\"Guozhu Ding, Mailin Li, Shan Li, Hao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12564-024-10024-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the effect of feedback intervals on student performance. A pre-experimental study with 36 students was conducted to determine the delayed time for providing feedback based on student behavioral data. A formal experiment with 80 students was then conducted to explore the joint effects of feedback interventions and task difficulty on student performance improvement. The findings revealed that feedback conditions had no significant impact on student learning gains in easy or difficult tasks. However, for medium difficulty tasks, feedback delays of 23 and 30 s led to greater academic improvement compared to immediate feedback, while feedback with a 35-s delay resulted in worse performance. Overall, the study highlights the importance of considering task difficulty when determining optimal feedback intervals and suggests that well-timed feedback can significantly enhance student learning, especially for tasks of moderate complexity. This challenges the common practice of providing immediate feedback, which may not always be optimal. Moreover, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for educators and instructional designers when designing online assessments and feedback mechanisms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Education Review\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"303 - 315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-024-10024-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-024-10024-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the impact of feedback timing on student performance in online testing
This study investigated the optimal feedback intervals for tasks of varying difficulty levels in online testing and whether task difficulty moderates the effect of feedback intervals on student performance. A pre-experimental study with 36 students was conducted to determine the delayed time for providing feedback based on student behavioral data. A formal experiment with 80 students was then conducted to explore the joint effects of feedback interventions and task difficulty on student performance improvement. The findings revealed that feedback conditions had no significant impact on student learning gains in easy or difficult tasks. However, for medium difficulty tasks, feedback delays of 23 and 30 s led to greater academic improvement compared to immediate feedback, while feedback with a 35-s delay resulted in worse performance. Overall, the study highlights the importance of considering task difficulty when determining optimal feedback intervals and suggests that well-timed feedback can significantly enhance student learning, especially for tasks of moderate complexity. This challenges the common practice of providing immediate feedback, which may not always be optimal. Moreover, the findings of this study provide valuable insights for educators and instructional designers when designing online assessments and feedback mechanisms.
期刊介绍:
The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context.
APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003.
APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).