P. N. Antokhin, V. G. Arshinova, M. Yu. Arshinov, V. E. Aryasov, B. D. Belan, S. B. Belan, D. K. Davydov, G. A. Ivlev, A. V. Kozlov, A. V. Panov, A. S. Prokushkin, I. R. Putilin, T. M. Rasskazchikova, D. E. Savkin, D. V. Simonenkov, G. N. Tolmachev, A. V. Fofonov
{"title":"雅科夫列夫-40飞机实验室设备与ZOTTO天文台设备测量的温室气体通量比较","authors":"P. N. Antokhin, V. G. Arshinova, M. Yu. Arshinov, V. E. Aryasov, B. D. Belan, S. B. Belan, D. K. Davydov, G. A. Ivlev, A. V. Kozlov, A. V. Panov, A. S. Prokushkin, I. R. Putilin, T. M. Rasskazchikova, D. E. Savkin, D. V. Simonenkov, G. N. Tolmachev, A. V. Fofonov","doi":"10.1134/S1024856024701665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ongoing global warming leads to the need in continuous monitoring of greenhouse gas concentrations and the magnitude of their fluxes. Gas exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere is mainly measured using eddy covariance, gradient, and chamber methods. This work compares greenhouse gas fluxes measured using the eddy covariance technique onboard an aircraft laboratory and with the gas analysis system and meteorological sensors at ZOTTO observatory. Instrument suites of the aircraft laboratory and the observatory are described. The comparison results showed that CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes measured by two different methods at the same altitudes coincide in sign, are close to each other in the value for carbon dioxide, and differ by up to 2 times for methane. The results are of interest to specialists who study greenhouse gas fluxes using the eddy covariance method.</p>","PeriodicalId":46751,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics","volume":"38 2","pages":"151 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Greenhouse Gas Fluxes Measured with the Equipment of Yakovlev-40 Aircraft Laboratory and ZOTTO Observatory\",\"authors\":\"P. N. Antokhin, V. G. Arshinova, M. Yu. Arshinov, V. E. Aryasov, B. D. Belan, S. B. Belan, D. K. Davydov, G. A. Ivlev, A. V. Kozlov, A. V. Panov, A. S. Prokushkin, I. R. Putilin, T. M. Rasskazchikova, D. E. Savkin, D. V. Simonenkov, G. N. Tolmachev, A. V. Fofonov\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S1024856024701665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The ongoing global warming leads to the need in continuous monitoring of greenhouse gas concentrations and the magnitude of their fluxes. Gas exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere is mainly measured using eddy covariance, gradient, and chamber methods. This work compares greenhouse gas fluxes measured using the eddy covariance technique onboard an aircraft laboratory and with the gas analysis system and meteorological sensors at ZOTTO observatory. Instrument suites of the aircraft laboratory and the observatory are described. The comparison results showed that CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes measured by two different methods at the same altitudes coincide in sign, are close to each other in the value for carbon dioxide, and differ by up to 2 times for methane. The results are of interest to specialists who study greenhouse gas fluxes using the eddy covariance method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"151 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1024856024701665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1024856024701665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between Greenhouse Gas Fluxes Measured with the Equipment of Yakovlev-40 Aircraft Laboratory and ZOTTO Observatory
The ongoing global warming leads to the need in continuous monitoring of greenhouse gas concentrations and the magnitude of their fluxes. Gas exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere is mainly measured using eddy covariance, gradient, and chamber methods. This work compares greenhouse gas fluxes measured using the eddy covariance technique onboard an aircraft laboratory and with the gas analysis system and meteorological sensors at ZOTTO observatory. Instrument suites of the aircraft laboratory and the observatory are described. The comparison results showed that CO2 and CH4 fluxes measured by two different methods at the same altitudes coincide in sign, are close to each other in the value for carbon dioxide, and differ by up to 2 times for methane. The results are of interest to specialists who study greenhouse gas fluxes using the eddy covariance method.
期刊介绍:
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics is an international peer reviewed journal that presents experimental and theoretical articles relevant to a wide range of problems of atmospheric and oceanic optics, ecology, and climate. The journal coverage includes: scattering and transfer of optical waves, spectroscopy of atmospheric gases, turbulent and nonlinear optical phenomena, adaptive optics, remote (ground-based, airborne, and spaceborne) sensing of the atmosphere and the surface, methods for solving of inverse problems, new equipment for optical investigations, development of computer programs and databases for optical studies. Thematic issues are devoted to the studies of atmospheric ozone, adaptive, nonlinear, and coherent optics, regional climate and environmental monitoring, and other subjects.