局部二甲双胍15%凝胶与氨苯砜5%凝胶治疗寻常性痤疮:一项裂脸研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Mohamed S. Zaky, Zakaria M. Obaid, Shahdan Abdel Rahman Zaafan, Mohamed L. Elsaie
{"title":"局部二甲双胍15%凝胶与氨苯砜5%凝胶治疗寻常性痤疮:一项裂脸研究","authors":"Mohamed S. Zaky,&nbsp;Zakaria M. Obaid,&nbsp;Shahdan Abdel Rahman Zaafan,&nbsp;Mohamed L. Elsaie","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04395-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Acne vulgaris (AV) is a prevalent dermatological condition with multifactorial pathogenesis, including hormonal, microbial, and inflammatory components. Although topical treatments remain first-line therapy for mild to moderate cases, limitations such as antibiotic resistance and adverse effects necessitate alternative options. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 15% topical metformin gel versus 5% topical dapsone gel in the management of AV using a split-face design. A single-blind, interventional, split-face study was conducted on 50 patients with AV. Each participant applied metformin 15% gel to one side of the face and dapsone 5% gel to the other side twice daily for 12 weeks, with a follow-up at week 16. Acne severity was assessed using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) at baseline and at regular intervals. Side effects and demographic correlations were also analyzed. Both agents significantly reduced GAGS scores over time. Dapsone showed superior efficacy at the 16-week follow-up, with a more sustained reduction in acne lesions. Side effects were minimal and comparable between groups. Younger patients showed better response, particularly to dapsone. Topical metformin and dapsone are both effective and well-tolerated treatments for AV. Dapsone demonstrated a slightly greater long-term benefit. Larger, multicenter trials are recommended to confirm these findings and explore combination regimens.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical metformin 15% gel versus dapsone 5% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a split face study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed S. Zaky,&nbsp;Zakaria M. Obaid,&nbsp;Shahdan Abdel Rahman Zaafan,&nbsp;Mohamed L. Elsaie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00403-025-04395-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Acne vulgaris (AV) is a prevalent dermatological condition with multifactorial pathogenesis, including hormonal, microbial, and inflammatory components. Although topical treatments remain first-line therapy for mild to moderate cases, limitations such as antibiotic resistance and adverse effects necessitate alternative options. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 15% topical metformin gel versus 5% topical dapsone gel in the management of AV using a split-face design. A single-blind, interventional, split-face study was conducted on 50 patients with AV. Each participant applied metformin 15% gel to one side of the face and dapsone 5% gel to the other side twice daily for 12 weeks, with a follow-up at week 16. Acne severity was assessed using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) at baseline and at regular intervals. Side effects and demographic correlations were also analyzed. Both agents significantly reduced GAGS scores over time. Dapsone showed superior efficacy at the 16-week follow-up, with a more sustained reduction in acne lesions. Side effects were minimal and comparable between groups. Younger patients showed better response, particularly to dapsone. Topical metformin and dapsone are both effective and well-tolerated treatments for AV. Dapsone demonstrated a slightly greater long-term benefit. Larger, multicenter trials are recommended to confirm these findings and explore combination regimens.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Dermatological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04395-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04395-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

寻常痤疮(AV)是一种常见的皮肤病与多因素的发病机制,包括激素,微生物和炎症成分。虽然局部治疗仍然是轻中度病例的一线治疗,但抗生素耐药性和不良反应等局限性需要其他选择。本研究旨在评估和比较15%外用二甲双胍凝胶和5%外用氨苯砜凝胶治疗AV的临床疗效和安全性,采用裂面设计。对50名AV患者进行了一项单盲、介入性、裂脸研究。每位参与者在12周内每天两次在面部一侧涂抹15%的二甲双胍凝胶,在另一侧涂抹5%的氨苯砜凝胶,随访第16周。使用全球痤疮分级系统(GAGS)在基线和定期间隔评估痤疮严重程度。还分析了副作用和人口统计学相关性。随着时间的推移,两种药物都显著降低了GAGS评分。在16周的随访中,氨苯砜显示出优越的疗效,痤疮病变的持续减少。副作用很小,两组间具有可比性。年轻的患者表现出更好的反应,尤其是对氨苯砜。局部二甲双胍和氨苯砜都是有效且耐受性良好的房颤治疗方法。氨苯砜显示出更大的长期益处。建议进行更大规模的多中心试验来证实这些发现并探索联合治疗方案。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical metformin 15% gel versus dapsone 5% gel in the treatment of acne vulgaris: a split face study

Acne vulgaris (AV) is a prevalent dermatological condition with multifactorial pathogenesis, including hormonal, microbial, and inflammatory components. Although topical treatments remain first-line therapy for mild to moderate cases, limitations such as antibiotic resistance and adverse effects necessitate alternative options. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 15% topical metformin gel versus 5% topical dapsone gel in the management of AV using a split-face design. A single-blind, interventional, split-face study was conducted on 50 patients with AV. Each participant applied metformin 15% gel to one side of the face and dapsone 5% gel to the other side twice daily for 12 weeks, with a follow-up at week 16. Acne severity was assessed using the Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) at baseline and at regular intervals. Side effects and demographic correlations were also analyzed. Both agents significantly reduced GAGS scores over time. Dapsone showed superior efficacy at the 16-week follow-up, with a more sustained reduction in acne lesions. Side effects were minimal and comparable between groups. Younger patients showed better response, particularly to dapsone. Topical metformin and dapsone are both effective and well-tolerated treatments for AV. Dapsone demonstrated a slightly greater long-term benefit. Larger, multicenter trials are recommended to confirm these findings and explore combination regimens.

Graphical abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信