关注:丹麦循环设计中社会可持续性的实践——“天鹅”作为案例研究

Tenna Doktor Olsen Tvedebrink, Tina Vestermann Olsen, Signe Glud
{"title":"关注:丹麦循环设计中社会可持续性的实践——“天鹅”作为案例研究","authors":"Tenna Doktor Olsen Tvedebrink,&nbsp;Tina Vestermann Olsen,&nbsp;Signe Glud","doi":"10.1007/s44150-025-00161-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><i>Social sustainability</i> is key for a successful green transition and circular design, focusing on justice and quality of life for all at both local and global scales. Despite its importance, social concerns are often underexamined in contemporary design practice and possibly even overshadowed by material concerns. This paper unfolds a theoretically informed discussion and analysis of a <i>Danish case study</i> to explore the complex context and practices of social sustainability in a circular design project, ‘the Swan’ kindergarten, and its’ design-related phases. We collected empirical data from <i>online videos, interviews</i> with key design related stakeholders, and <i>social media</i> showcasing local community involvement. Our theoretical framework highlights a ‘caring perspective’ that relies on situated knowledge and emphasizes understanding complex social phenomena within their broader contexts. Our approach foregrounds the <i>entanglement</i> of material and social concerns through three interrelated lenses of care: 1) material practice (what is done), 2) affective involvement (who it involves), and 3) ethical intentions (why it matters). Our findings reveal that, despite ethical intentions, material practices are often driven by environmental agendas and tectonic aesthetics, overshadowing social concerns like global justice and local affective involvement. With these preliminary insights, we aim to raise awareness of the importance of maintaining a focus on social sustainability and advancing the debate on ‘the social’ in circular design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44150-025-00161-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking care: on the practices of social sustainability in danish circular design – ‘the swan’ as a case study\",\"authors\":\"Tenna Doktor Olsen Tvedebrink,&nbsp;Tina Vestermann Olsen,&nbsp;Signe Glud\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44150-025-00161-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><i>Social sustainability</i> is key for a successful green transition and circular design, focusing on justice and quality of life for all at both local and global scales. Despite its importance, social concerns are often underexamined in contemporary design practice and possibly even overshadowed by material concerns. This paper unfolds a theoretically informed discussion and analysis of a <i>Danish case study</i> to explore the complex context and practices of social sustainability in a circular design project, ‘the Swan’ kindergarten, and its’ design-related phases. We collected empirical data from <i>online videos, interviews</i> with key design related stakeholders, and <i>social media</i> showcasing local community involvement. Our theoretical framework highlights a ‘caring perspective’ that relies on situated knowledge and emphasizes understanding complex social phenomena within their broader contexts. Our approach foregrounds the <i>entanglement</i> of material and social concerns through three interrelated lenses of care: 1) material practice (what is done), 2) affective involvement (who it involves), and 3) ethical intentions (why it matters). Our findings reveal that, despite ethical intentions, material practices are often driven by environmental agendas and tectonic aesthetics, overshadowing social concerns like global justice and local affective involvement. With these preliminary insights, we aim to raise awareness of the importance of maintaining a focus on social sustainability and advancing the debate on ‘the social’ in circular design.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44150-025-00161-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00161-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00161-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会的可持续性是成功的绿色转型和循环设计的关键,在当地和全球范围内关注所有人的正义和生活质量。尽管社会问题很重要,但在当代设计实践中,社会问题往往被忽视,甚至可能被材料问题所掩盖。本文展开了对丹麦案例研究的理论讨论和分析,探讨了循环设计项目“天鹅”幼儿园及其设计相关阶段的复杂背景和社会可持续性实践。我们从在线视频、对关键设计相关利益相关者的采访以及展示当地社区参与的社交媒体中收集了经验数据。我们的理论框架强调了一个“关心的视角”,它依赖于情境知识,并强调在更广泛的背景下理解复杂的社会现象。我们的方法通过三个相互关联的护理镜头来强调物质和社会问题的纠缠:1)物质实践(做了什么),2)情感参与(涉及谁),3)道德意图(为什么重要)。我们的研究结果表明,尽管存在伦理意图,但材料实践往往受到环境议程和构造美学的驱动,掩盖了全球正义和地方情感参与等社会问题。有了这些初步的见解,我们的目标是提高人们对保持对社会可持续性的关注的重要性的认识,并推进关于循环设计中“社会”的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Taking care: on the practices of social sustainability in danish circular design – ‘the swan’ as a case study

Social sustainability is key for a successful green transition and circular design, focusing on justice and quality of life for all at both local and global scales. Despite its importance, social concerns are often underexamined in contemporary design practice and possibly even overshadowed by material concerns. This paper unfolds a theoretically informed discussion and analysis of a Danish case study to explore the complex context and practices of social sustainability in a circular design project, ‘the Swan’ kindergarten, and its’ design-related phases. We collected empirical data from online videos, interviews with key design related stakeholders, and social media showcasing local community involvement. Our theoretical framework highlights a ‘caring perspective’ that relies on situated knowledge and emphasizes understanding complex social phenomena within their broader contexts. Our approach foregrounds the entanglement of material and social concerns through three interrelated lenses of care: 1) material practice (what is done), 2) affective involvement (who it involves), and 3) ethical intentions (why it matters). Our findings reveal that, despite ethical intentions, material practices are often driven by environmental agendas and tectonic aesthetics, overshadowing social concerns like global justice and local affective involvement. With these preliminary insights, we aim to raise awareness of the importance of maintaining a focus on social sustainability and advancing the debate on ‘the social’ in circular design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信