压力和战略决策

IF 1.5 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Benjamin G. Serpell, Blair T. Crewther, Phillip J. Fourie, Stephen P. J. Goodman, Christian J. Cook
{"title":"压力和战略决策","authors":"Benjamin G. Serpell,&nbsp;Blair T. Crewther,&nbsp;Phillip J. Fourie,&nbsp;Stephen P. J. Goodman,&nbsp;Christian J. Cook","doi":"10.1007/s40750-025-00264-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Psychology and social science research offer some promising work in the field of decision-making science. However, given the qualitative nature of much of this research, understanding some physiological bases of decision-making may assist by providing more objectivity. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to explore hormonal and neurophysiological biomarkers of stress relative to strategic decision making, with and without an accompanying exercise stress.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-one competitive male chess players were recruited to this study. On two separate occasions prefrontal cortex (a brain region involved in executive decision making which is sensitive to stress) hemodynamics were measured while participants played a standardized game of chess against a computer bot, once after exposure to a physical stressor (experimental condition) and once without (control condition). Participant’s stress hormones (testosterone and cortisol) were also measured in the morning of each test and immediately prior to the game of chess.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were more likely to win under experimental conditions. Interestingly, there was no difference between conditions for baseline testosterone and cortisol concentrations, and the exercise protocol did not elicit a hormonal change. However, significant differences were observed for prefrontal cortex hemodynamics following the physical stressor (vs. control condition), and changes in prefrontal cortex hemodynamics were observed as games progressed (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.034).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results speculatively suggest several independent pathways exist to explain how stress affects decision making. This work opens several vistas for future research exploring decision making using neurohormonal/physiological biomarkers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7178,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40750-025-00264-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress and Strategic Decision Making\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin G. Serpell,&nbsp;Blair T. Crewther,&nbsp;Phillip J. Fourie,&nbsp;Stephen P. J. Goodman,&nbsp;Christian J. Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40750-025-00264-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Psychology and social science research offer some promising work in the field of decision-making science. However, given the qualitative nature of much of this research, understanding some physiological bases of decision-making may assist by providing more objectivity. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to explore hormonal and neurophysiological biomarkers of stress relative to strategic decision making, with and without an accompanying exercise stress.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-one competitive male chess players were recruited to this study. On two separate occasions prefrontal cortex (a brain region involved in executive decision making which is sensitive to stress) hemodynamics were measured while participants played a standardized game of chess against a computer bot, once after exposure to a physical stressor (experimental condition) and once without (control condition). Participant’s stress hormones (testosterone and cortisol) were also measured in the morning of each test and immediately prior to the game of chess.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Participants were more likely to win under experimental conditions. Interestingly, there was no difference between conditions for baseline testosterone and cortisol concentrations, and the exercise protocol did not elicit a hormonal change. However, significant differences were observed for prefrontal cortex hemodynamics following the physical stressor (vs. control condition), and changes in prefrontal cortex hemodynamics were observed as games progressed (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.034).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our results speculatively suggest several independent pathways exist to explain how stress affects decision making. This work opens several vistas for future research exploring decision making using neurohormonal/physiological biomarkers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40750-025-00264-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-025-00264-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-025-00264-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的心理学和社会科学的研究为决策科学领域提供了一些有前途的工作。然而,考虑到大部分研究的定性性质,了解决策的一些生理基础可能有助于提供更多的客观性。因此,本研究的目的是探索在有或没有伴随运动压力的情况下,与战略决策相关的应激激素和神经生理生物标志物。方法招募21名男子国际象棋选手进行研究。在两种不同的情况下,当参与者与计算机机器人进行标准化的国际象棋比赛时,前额叶皮层(一个涉及执行决策的大脑区域,对压力敏感)的血流动力学被测量,一次是在暴露于物理压力后(实验条件),一次是没有(控制条件)。参与者的压力荷尔蒙(睾酮和皮质醇)也在每次测试的早晨和象棋比赛之前被测量。结果在实验条件下,参与者更有可能获胜。有趣的是,基线睾酮和皮质醇浓度没有差异,运动方案也没有引起激素变化。然而,在物理应激条件下(与对照组相比),前额叶皮层血流动力学观察到显著差异,并且随着游戏的进行,前额叶皮层血流动力学观察到变化(p≤0.034)。结论我们的研究结果推测,存在几种独立的途径来解释压力如何影响决策。这项工作为利用神经激素/生理生物标志物探索决策的未来研究开辟了几个前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress and Strategic Decision Making

Purpose

Psychology and social science research offer some promising work in the field of decision-making science. However, given the qualitative nature of much of this research, understanding some physiological bases of decision-making may assist by providing more objectivity. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to explore hormonal and neurophysiological biomarkers of stress relative to strategic decision making, with and without an accompanying exercise stress.

Methods

Twenty-one competitive male chess players were recruited to this study. On two separate occasions prefrontal cortex (a brain region involved in executive decision making which is sensitive to stress) hemodynamics were measured while participants played a standardized game of chess against a computer bot, once after exposure to a physical stressor (experimental condition) and once without (control condition). Participant’s stress hormones (testosterone and cortisol) were also measured in the morning of each test and immediately prior to the game of chess.

Results

Participants were more likely to win under experimental conditions. Interestingly, there was no difference between conditions for baseline testosterone and cortisol concentrations, and the exercise protocol did not elicit a hormonal change. However, significant differences were observed for prefrontal cortex hemodynamics following the physical stressor (vs. control condition), and changes in prefrontal cortex hemodynamics were observed as games progressed (p ≤ 0.034).

Conclusion

Our results speculatively suggest several independent pathways exist to explain how stress affects decision making. This work opens several vistas for future research exploring decision making using neurohormonal/physiological biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology is an international interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes theoretical and empirical studies of any aspects of adaptive human behavior (e.g. cooperation, affiliation, and bonding, competition and aggression, sex and relationships, parenting, decision-making), with emphasis on studies that also address the biological (e.g. neural, endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, genetic) mechanisms controlling behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信