{"title":"讲故事的惠勒:关于历史对生活的好处和缺点","authors":"Stefano Furlan","doi":"10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00109-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When a physicist evokes the past, historians typically start rubbing their hands, waiting for their chance to correct the naive scientist who seems to intrude into their job. In this attitude too, however, there is a form of naiveté that can prevent us from appreciating and properly weighing many aspects of history. The manifold uses of the past by the physicists themselves, in particular, remain a neglected topic. This paper intends to show how an eminent figure such as John A. Wheeler (1911–2008), also thanks to his long life and career, created a highly peculiar—and, communication-wise, very effective—mixture of personal experience and reminiscences, historical pathos and anecdotes, guiding ideas and metaphors. The relevance of such amalgam is not limited to the employment of rhetoric in science, since it shaped Wheeler’s influential research programs and suggestions throughout decades, besides offering a powerfully evocative and captivating communicative model for the speculative frontiers of physics. While all this is meant as a study in the way Wheeler made use of the past within his activities as a physicist, it can also provide us with a critical lesson about today’s construction of pseudo-historical narratives that try to legitimize bold proposals in lack of empirical results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00109-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wheeler the storyteller: on the uses and drawbacks of history for life\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Furlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00109-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When a physicist evokes the past, historians typically start rubbing their hands, waiting for their chance to correct the naive scientist who seems to intrude into their job. In this attitude too, however, there is a form of naiveté that can prevent us from appreciating and properly weighing many aspects of history. The manifold uses of the past by the physicists themselves, in particular, remain a neglected topic. This paper intends to show how an eminent figure such as John A. Wheeler (1911–2008), also thanks to his long life and career, created a highly peculiar—and, communication-wise, very effective—mixture of personal experience and reminiscences, historical pathos and anecdotes, guiding ideas and metaphors. The relevance of such amalgam is not limited to the employment of rhetoric in science, since it shaped Wheeler’s influential research programs and suggestions throughout decades, besides offering a powerfully evocative and captivating communicative model for the speculative frontiers of physics. While all this is meant as a study in the way Wheeler made use of the past within his activities as a physicist, it can also provide us with a critical lesson about today’s construction of pseudo-historical narratives that try to legitimize bold proposals in lack of empirical results.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Physical Journal H\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00109-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Physical Journal H\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00109-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal H","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/s13129-025-00109-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wheeler the storyteller: on the uses and drawbacks of history for life
When a physicist evokes the past, historians typically start rubbing their hands, waiting for their chance to correct the naive scientist who seems to intrude into their job. In this attitude too, however, there is a form of naiveté that can prevent us from appreciating and properly weighing many aspects of history. The manifold uses of the past by the physicists themselves, in particular, remain a neglected topic. This paper intends to show how an eminent figure such as John A. Wheeler (1911–2008), also thanks to his long life and career, created a highly peculiar—and, communication-wise, very effective—mixture of personal experience and reminiscences, historical pathos and anecdotes, guiding ideas and metaphors. The relevance of such amalgam is not limited to the employment of rhetoric in science, since it shaped Wheeler’s influential research programs and suggestions throughout decades, besides offering a powerfully evocative and captivating communicative model for the speculative frontiers of physics. While all this is meant as a study in the way Wheeler made use of the past within his activities as a physicist, it can also provide us with a critical lesson about today’s construction of pseudo-historical narratives that try to legitimize bold proposals in lack of empirical results.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this journal is to catalyse, foster, and disseminate an awareness and understanding of the historical development of ideas in contemporary physics, and more generally, ideas about how Nature works.
The scope explicitly includes:
- Contributions addressing the history of physics and of physical ideas and concepts, the interplay of physics and mathematics as well as the natural sciences, and the history and philosophy of sciences, together with discussions of experimental ideas and designs - inasmuch as they clearly relate, and preferably add, to the understanding of modern physics.
- Annotated and/or contextual translations of relevant foreign-language texts.
- Careful characterisations of old and/or abandoned ideas including past mistakes and false leads, thereby helping working physicists to assess how compelling contemporary ideas may turn out to be in future, i.e. with hindsight.