研究替代溶剂对菠菜-番茄粉和藻类材料中亲脂性食品成分可萃取性的影响

IF 3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mario Schmidt, Volker Böhm
{"title":"研究替代溶剂对菠菜-番茄粉和藻类材料中亲脂性食品成分可萃取性的影响","authors":"Mario Schmidt,&nbsp;Volker Böhm","doi":"10.1007/s12161-025-02821-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extraction of natural products such as carotenoids, vitamin E and chlorophylls is still accompanied with certain challenges. Limitations exist in widespread availability of sophisticated techniques (e.g. supercritical fluid), which are often replaced by conventional approaches such as tissue homogeniser with disperser blades, a sonication bath or vortex mixing. Moreover, an appropriate selection of solvents is a critical step for selective extraction of compounds in complex, severely extractable matrices. The present investigation focussed on a comparison of conventional solvents (e.g. tetrahydrofuran, acetone, hexane) with more sustainable alternatives (e.g. 2-methyl-tetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF); dimethyl carbonate (DMC); cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)) with and without addition of methanol regarding a broad range of analyte polarities. Herein, tetrahydrofuran with methanol resulted in maximum extraction efficiencies for total carotenoids in a spinach tomato powder. 2-MeTHF, DMC and CPME partially combined with MeOH proved to be equivalent alternatives for extraction of xanthophylls and β-carotene isomers. A comparison of renowned and widely available extraction techniques in context of challenging sample matrices (dried, pelletised and fresh microalgae) resulted in preferably powerful approaches such as Ultra-Turrax® homogenisation and sonifier probe application. Necessary pretreatments with methanol combined with powerful extraction techniques were apparently recommendable for dried algae products compared to fresh algae paste, thus reducing the potential extraction repetitions. Finally, a comparison of different syringe filter materials suggested the use of mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membranes for avoiding a significant loss (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) of analytes (lutein, β-carotene, lycopene, vitamin E) compared to seven other membrane materials. Overall, these results represent a contribution to routine analysis of lipophilic food ingredients with a high transferability and adaptability across applied research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":561,"journal":{"name":"Food Analytical Methods","volume":"18 8","pages":"1850 - 1862"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12161-025-02821-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Alternative Solvents Regarding Extractability of Lipophilic Food Ingredients in Spinach-Tomato Powder and Algae Materials\",\"authors\":\"Mario Schmidt,&nbsp;Volker Böhm\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12161-025-02821-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Extraction of natural products such as carotenoids, vitamin E and chlorophylls is still accompanied with certain challenges. Limitations exist in widespread availability of sophisticated techniques (e.g. supercritical fluid), which are often replaced by conventional approaches such as tissue homogeniser with disperser blades, a sonication bath or vortex mixing. Moreover, an appropriate selection of solvents is a critical step for selective extraction of compounds in complex, severely extractable matrices. The present investigation focussed on a comparison of conventional solvents (e.g. tetrahydrofuran, acetone, hexane) with more sustainable alternatives (e.g. 2-methyl-tetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF); dimethyl carbonate (DMC); cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)) with and without addition of methanol regarding a broad range of analyte polarities. Herein, tetrahydrofuran with methanol resulted in maximum extraction efficiencies for total carotenoids in a spinach tomato powder. 2-MeTHF, DMC and CPME partially combined with MeOH proved to be equivalent alternatives for extraction of xanthophylls and β-carotene isomers. A comparison of renowned and widely available extraction techniques in context of challenging sample matrices (dried, pelletised and fresh microalgae) resulted in preferably powerful approaches such as Ultra-Turrax® homogenisation and sonifier probe application. Necessary pretreatments with methanol combined with powerful extraction techniques were apparently recommendable for dried algae products compared to fresh algae paste, thus reducing the potential extraction repetitions. Finally, a comparison of different syringe filter materials suggested the use of mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membranes for avoiding a significant loss (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) of analytes (lutein, β-carotene, lycopene, vitamin E) compared to seven other membrane materials. Overall, these results represent a contribution to routine analysis of lipophilic food ingredients with a high transferability and adaptability across applied research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"volume\":\"18 8\",\"pages\":\"1850 - 1862\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12161-025-02821-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Analytical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02821-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Analytical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-025-02821-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

天然产物如类胡萝卜素、维生素E和叶绿素的提取仍然面临一定的挑战。复杂技术(如超临界流体)的广泛可用性存在局限性,这些技术通常被传统方法所取代,如带分散叶片的组织均质机、超声浴或涡旋混合。此外,适当的溶剂选择是在复杂的,严格可提取的基质中选择性提取化合物的关键步骤。目前的研究重点是比较传统溶剂(如四氢呋喃、丙酮、己烷)与更可持续的替代品(如2-甲基四氢呋喃(2-MeTHF));碳酸二甲酯(DMC);环戊基甲基醚(CPME))在广泛的分析物极性范围内添加或不添加甲醇。在这里,四氢呋喃与甲醇产生了菠菜番茄粉中总类胡萝卜素的最大萃取效率。2-MeTHF、DMC和CPME与MeOH部分结合被证明是提取叶黄素和β-胡萝卜素异构体的等效替代品。在具有挑战性的样品基质(干燥,颗粒化和新鲜微藻)的背景下,对著名和广泛可用的提取技术进行比较,产生了优选的强大方法,如Ultra-Turrax®均质化和sonifier探针应用。与鲜藻膏相比,对干藻产品进行必要的甲醇预处理并结合强大的提取技术显然是可取的,从而减少了潜在的提取重复次数。最后,通过对不同注射器过滤材料的比较,建议使用混合纤维素酯(MCE)膜,与其他7种膜材料相比,可避免分析物(叶黄素、β-胡萝卜素、番茄红素、维生素E)的显著损失(p < 0.05)。总的来说,这些结果代表了对亲脂性食品成分的常规分析的贡献,在应用研究中具有很高的可转移性和适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating Alternative Solvents Regarding Extractability of Lipophilic Food Ingredients in Spinach-Tomato Powder and Algae Materials

Extraction of natural products such as carotenoids, vitamin E and chlorophylls is still accompanied with certain challenges. Limitations exist in widespread availability of sophisticated techniques (e.g. supercritical fluid), which are often replaced by conventional approaches such as tissue homogeniser with disperser blades, a sonication bath or vortex mixing. Moreover, an appropriate selection of solvents is a critical step for selective extraction of compounds in complex, severely extractable matrices. The present investigation focussed on a comparison of conventional solvents (e.g. tetrahydrofuran, acetone, hexane) with more sustainable alternatives (e.g. 2-methyl-tetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF); dimethyl carbonate (DMC); cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)) with and without addition of methanol regarding a broad range of analyte polarities. Herein, tetrahydrofuran with methanol resulted in maximum extraction efficiencies for total carotenoids in a spinach tomato powder. 2-MeTHF, DMC and CPME partially combined with MeOH proved to be equivalent alternatives for extraction of xanthophylls and β-carotene isomers. A comparison of renowned and widely available extraction techniques in context of challenging sample matrices (dried, pelletised and fresh microalgae) resulted in preferably powerful approaches such as Ultra-Turrax® homogenisation and sonifier probe application. Necessary pretreatments with methanol combined with powerful extraction techniques were apparently recommendable for dried algae products compared to fresh algae paste, thus reducing the potential extraction repetitions. Finally, a comparison of different syringe filter materials suggested the use of mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membranes for avoiding a significant loss (p < 0.05) of analytes (lutein, β-carotene, lycopene, vitamin E) compared to seven other membrane materials. Overall, these results represent a contribution to routine analysis of lipophilic food ingredients with a high transferability and adaptability across applied research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Analytical Methods
Food Analytical Methods 农林科学-食品科技
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
244
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: Food Analytical Methods publishes original articles, review articles, and notes on novel and/or state-of-the-art analytical methods or issues to be solved, as well as significant improvements or interesting applications to existing methods. These include analytical technology and methodology for food microbial contaminants, food chemistry and toxicology, food quality, food authenticity and food traceability. The journal covers fundamental and specific aspects of the development, optimization, and practical implementation in routine laboratories, and validation of food analytical methods for the monitoring of food safety and quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信