什么不符合眼睛:分子洞察从中北部意大利新石器时代收获工具的粘合剂技术

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Irene Bertelli, Claudia Finocchiaro, Maxime Rageot, Erika Ribechini, Mario Mineo, Davide Mengoli, Cristiana Petrinelli Pannocchia, Elisabetta Starnini, Alice Vassanelli, Juan F. Gibaja, Niccolò Mazzucco
{"title":"什么不符合眼睛:分子洞察从中北部意大利新石器时代收获工具的粘合剂技术","authors":"Irene Bertelli,&nbsp;Claudia Finocchiaro,&nbsp;Maxime Rageot,&nbsp;Erika Ribechini,&nbsp;Mario Mineo,&nbsp;Davide Mengoli,&nbsp;Cristiana Petrinelli Pannocchia,&nbsp;Elisabetta Starnini,&nbsp;Alice Vassanelli,&nbsp;Juan F. Gibaja,&nbsp;Niccolò Mazzucco","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02280-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the geographical distribution and molecular composition of adhesive substances employed by Neolithic communities in north-central Italy. By applying advanced mass spectrometric techniques—specifically Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)—we chemically characterized organic residues recovered from flint blades and complete and fragmentary wooden sickles, across multiple archaeological sites. The dual analytical approach proved especially effective in detecting and identifying molecular markers in samples where the preserved adhesive was present only in trace amounts, thus overcoming limitations imposed by minimal sample volumes and potential contamination. Our comprehensive analysis revealed a diverse portfolio of adhesive materials, notably birch bark tar, Pinaceae resin, and bitumen. The coexistence of these substances within the same chronological framework suggests a complex technological and procurement strategy among Neolithic groups. Local resources, such as pine resins, were likely exploited alongside non-local materials, implying the existence of well-established exchange networks and adaptive responses to regional environmental conditions. By coupling archaeological investigation with molecular characterization, this research demonstrates that even minimally preserved organic residues can yield significant compositional data, thereby contributing to a more nuanced reconstruction of prehistoric technological networks and socio-economic interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What doesn’t meet the eye: molecular insights into adhesive technologies of Neolithic harvesting tools from Central-North Italy\",\"authors\":\"Irene Bertelli,&nbsp;Claudia Finocchiaro,&nbsp;Maxime Rageot,&nbsp;Erika Ribechini,&nbsp;Mario Mineo,&nbsp;Davide Mengoli,&nbsp;Cristiana Petrinelli Pannocchia,&nbsp;Elisabetta Starnini,&nbsp;Alice Vassanelli,&nbsp;Juan F. Gibaja,&nbsp;Niccolò Mazzucco\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-025-02280-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores the geographical distribution and molecular composition of adhesive substances employed by Neolithic communities in north-central Italy. By applying advanced mass spectrometric techniques—specifically Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)—we chemically characterized organic residues recovered from flint blades and complete and fragmentary wooden sickles, across multiple archaeological sites. The dual analytical approach proved especially effective in detecting and identifying molecular markers in samples where the preserved adhesive was present only in trace amounts, thus overcoming limitations imposed by minimal sample volumes and potential contamination. Our comprehensive analysis revealed a diverse portfolio of adhesive materials, notably birch bark tar, Pinaceae resin, and bitumen. The coexistence of these substances within the same chronological framework suggests a complex technological and procurement strategy among Neolithic groups. Local resources, such as pine resins, were likely exploited alongside non-local materials, implying the existence of well-established exchange networks and adaptive responses to regional environmental conditions. By coupling archaeological investigation with molecular characterization, this research demonstrates that even minimally preserved organic residues can yield significant compositional data, thereby contributing to a more nuanced reconstruction of prehistoric technological networks and socio-economic interactions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02280-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02280-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了意大利中北部新石器时代社区使用的粘附物质的地理分布和分子组成。通过应用先进的质谱技术-特别是热解-气相色谱/质谱(pygc /MS)和气相色谱/质谱(GC/MS) -我们对多个考古遗址中从燧石刀片和完整和碎片木镰刀中回收的有机残留物进行了化学表征。双重分析方法被证明在检测和识别样品中的分子标记方面特别有效,其中保存的粘合剂仅以微量存在,从而克服了最小样本量和潜在污染的限制。我们的综合分析揭示了粘合剂材料的多样化组合,特别是桦树皮焦油,松科树脂和沥青。这些物质在同一时间框架内共存,表明新石器时代群体具有复杂的技术和采购策略。当地资源,如松树脂,可能与非当地材料一起被开发,这意味着存在完善的交换网络和对区域环境条件的适应性反应。通过将考古调查与分子表征相结合,本研究表明,即使是保存最少的有机残留物也可以产生重要的成分数据,从而有助于更细致地重建史前技术网络和社会经济相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What doesn’t meet the eye: molecular insights into adhesive technologies of Neolithic harvesting tools from Central-North Italy

What doesn’t meet the eye: molecular insights into adhesive technologies of Neolithic harvesting tools from Central-North Italy

This study explores the geographical distribution and molecular composition of adhesive substances employed by Neolithic communities in north-central Italy. By applying advanced mass spectrometric techniques—specifically Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) and Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS)—we chemically characterized organic residues recovered from flint blades and complete and fragmentary wooden sickles, across multiple archaeological sites. The dual analytical approach proved especially effective in detecting and identifying molecular markers in samples where the preserved adhesive was present only in trace amounts, thus overcoming limitations imposed by minimal sample volumes and potential contamination. Our comprehensive analysis revealed a diverse portfolio of adhesive materials, notably birch bark tar, Pinaceae resin, and bitumen. The coexistence of these substances within the same chronological framework suggests a complex technological and procurement strategy among Neolithic groups. Local resources, such as pine resins, were likely exploited alongside non-local materials, implying the existence of well-established exchange networks and adaptive responses to regional environmental conditions. By coupling archaeological investigation with molecular characterization, this research demonstrates that even minimally preserved organic residues can yield significant compositional data, thereby contributing to a more nuanced reconstruction of prehistoric technological networks and socio-economic interactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信