可发现性、可用性和可读性:一个评估在线档案的残疾用户可访问性的框架

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Elizabeth A. Pineo
{"title":"可发现性、可用性和可读性:一个评估在线档案的残疾用户可访问性的框架","authors":"Elizabeth A. Pineo","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09495-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights gives individuals the freedom of opinion and expression, which includes the right to information access. In an archival context, information access can mean many things. In this paper, I have focused on accessibility for Disabled users. What does it mean for archival materials or websites to be “accessible”? To begin answering this question, I examined 55 archives’ online materials using three metrics: discoverability, usability, and readability. For this project, discoverability focuses on the logic of the paths from an archive's homepage to target items. Usability evaluates the implementation of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines and the presence of multiple access points for information. Readability looks at the reading levels of descriptive text using Flesch–Kincaid analysis and the presence of text alternatives. I find that, at present, discoverability, usability, and readability for the examined archival materials are low. However, by breaking down the broad idea of “accessibility” into three categories, improving that reality might become easier. Specific strategies for increasing discoverability, usability, and readability are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09495-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discoverability, usability, and readability: a framework for assessing accessibility for disabled users of online archives\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. Pineo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-025-09495-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights gives individuals the freedom of opinion and expression, which includes the right to information access. In an archival context, information access can mean many things. In this paper, I have focused on accessibility for Disabled users. What does it mean for archival materials or websites to be “accessible”? To begin answering this question, I examined 55 archives’ online materials using three metrics: discoverability, usability, and readability. For this project, discoverability focuses on the logic of the paths from an archive's homepage to target items. Usability evaluates the implementation of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines and the presence of multiple access points for information. Readability looks at the reading levels of descriptive text using Flesch–Kincaid analysis and the presence of text alternatives. I find that, at present, discoverability, usability, and readability for the examined archival materials are low. However, by breaking down the broad idea of “accessibility” into three categories, improving that reality might become easier. Specific strategies for increasing discoverability, usability, and readability are also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-025-09495-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09495-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09495-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《世界人权宣言》第19条赋予个人意见和表达的自由,其中包括获取信息的权利。在档案环境中,信息访问可能意味着很多东西。在本文中,我主要关注残障用户的可访问性。档案资料或网站的“可访问性”是什么意思?为了回答这个问题,我用三个指标检查了55个档案的在线材料:可发现性、可用性和可读性。对于这个项目,可发现性侧重于从存档的主页到目标项目的路径逻辑。可用性评估Web内容可访问性准则的实现和信息的多个访问点的存在。可读性使用Flesch-Kincaid分析和文本替代的存在来观察描述性文本的阅读水平。我发现,目前,档案资料的可发现性、可用性和可读性都很低。然而,通过将“可访问性”的广义概念分解为三个类别,改进这一现实可能会变得更容易。还讨论了提高可发现性、可用性和可读性的具体策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discoverability, usability, and readability: a framework for assessing accessibility for disabled users of online archives

Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights gives individuals the freedom of opinion and expression, which includes the right to information access. In an archival context, information access can mean many things. In this paper, I have focused on accessibility for Disabled users. What does it mean for archival materials or websites to be “accessible”? To begin answering this question, I examined 55 archives’ online materials using three metrics: discoverability, usability, and readability. For this project, discoverability focuses on the logic of the paths from an archive's homepage to target items. Usability evaluates the implementation of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines and the presence of multiple access points for information. Readability looks at the reading levels of descriptive text using Flesch–Kincaid analysis and the presence of text alternatives. I find that, at present, discoverability, usability, and readability for the examined archival materials are low. However, by breaking down the broad idea of “accessibility” into three categories, improving that reality might become easier. Specific strategies for increasing discoverability, usability, and readability are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信