历史建筑预防性保护和风险管理的整体方法:科尼亚博物馆的比较分析

Gülşen Dişli, Saliha Akın, Elif Nur Arslan, Aysel Eda Çalışkan, Merve Kılınç Gilisıralıoğlu
{"title":"历史建筑预防性保护和风险管理的整体方法:科尼亚博物馆的比较分析","authors":"Gülşen Dişli,&nbsp;Saliha Akın,&nbsp;Elif Nur Arslan,&nbsp;Aysel Eda Çalışkan,&nbsp;Merve Kılınç Gilisıralıoğlu","doi":"10.1007/s44150-025-00163-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Historic buildings require risk management as they are exposed to potential damage in the event of future hazards and disasters. The aim of this study is therefore to clearly identify and classify risks and determine their extent and vulnerability in historic buildings through the development of a holistic risk management strategy in order to contribute to their preventive conservation by proposing improvement plans before they become hazards. Four museum cases were selected as examples of historical buildings in Konya. The potential risks threatening the buildings were determined using data from national databases and the ABC risk analysis method developed by the Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) is used as a risk management approach. In addition, field research, oral interviews, archival and literature research were conducted. By combining all data, a holistic methodology was developed to identify potential risks threatening the buildings, their vulnerability and priority levels, and to determine the current condition of the buildings/museum collections to understand the need for preventive conservation and restoration. As a novel contribution, this study engages in comparative studies by analyzing buildings from different eras, with different materials and construction techniques, and proposes a systematic framework for heritage risk management that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches. According to the results of the analysis, the average risk of the buildings was categorized as medium and their priority level as low. The analyses carried out were consistent with the results of the on-site observations, so the reliability of this method was considered high. In addition, the vulnerability and priority levels determined by the risk analyses and on-site observations provided accurate information on the current condition of the buildings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A holistic approach to preventive conservation and risk management in historic buildings: a comparative analysis in Konya museums\",\"authors\":\"Gülşen Dişli,&nbsp;Saliha Akın,&nbsp;Elif Nur Arslan,&nbsp;Aysel Eda Çalışkan,&nbsp;Merve Kılınç Gilisıralıoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44150-025-00163-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Historic buildings require risk management as they are exposed to potential damage in the event of future hazards and disasters. The aim of this study is therefore to clearly identify and classify risks and determine their extent and vulnerability in historic buildings through the development of a holistic risk management strategy in order to contribute to their preventive conservation by proposing improvement plans before they become hazards. Four museum cases were selected as examples of historical buildings in Konya. The potential risks threatening the buildings were determined using data from national databases and the ABC risk analysis method developed by the Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) is used as a risk management approach. In addition, field research, oral interviews, archival and literature research were conducted. By combining all data, a holistic methodology was developed to identify potential risks threatening the buildings, their vulnerability and priority levels, and to determine the current condition of the buildings/museum collections to understand the need for preventive conservation and restoration. As a novel contribution, this study engages in comparative studies by analyzing buildings from different eras, with different materials and construction techniques, and proposes a systematic framework for heritage risk management that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches. According to the results of the analysis, the average risk of the buildings was categorized as medium and their priority level as low. The analyses carried out were consistent with the results of the on-site observations, so the reliability of this method was considered high. In addition, the vulnerability and priority levels determined by the risk analyses and on-site observations provided accurate information on the current condition of the buildings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture, Structures and Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00163-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-025-00163-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史建筑需要风险管理,因为它们在未来的灾害和灾害中可能受到潜在的破坏。因此,本研究的目的是通过制定整体风险管理策略,明确识别和分类历史建筑的风险,并确定其程度和脆弱性,以便在历史建筑成为危害之前提出改善计划,从而有助于对其进行预防性保护。四个博物馆案例被选为科尼亚历史建筑的例子。利用国家数据库的数据确定威胁建筑物的潜在风险,并使用加拿大保护研究所(CCI)和国际文化财产保护和修复研究中心(ICCROM)开发的ABC风险分析方法作为风险管理方法。此外,还进行了实地调查、口头访谈、档案和文献研究。通过综合所有数据,开发了一种整体方法,以确定威胁建筑物的潜在风险,其脆弱性和优先级别,并确定建筑物/博物馆藏品的现状,以了解预防性保护和修复的必要性。作为一项新颖的贡献,本研究通过对不同时代、不同材料和建造技术的建筑进行比较研究,提出了一个定性和定量相结合的遗产风险管理系统框架。根据分析结果,建筑物的平均风险等级为中等,优先级为低。所进行的分析与现场观测结果一致,因此认为该方法的可靠性高。此外,风险分析和现场观察确定的易损性和优先级提供了关于建筑物现状的准确信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A holistic approach to preventive conservation and risk management in historic buildings: a comparative analysis in Konya museums

Historic buildings require risk management as they are exposed to potential damage in the event of future hazards and disasters. The aim of this study is therefore to clearly identify and classify risks and determine their extent and vulnerability in historic buildings through the development of a holistic risk management strategy in order to contribute to their preventive conservation by proposing improvement plans before they become hazards. Four museum cases were selected as examples of historical buildings in Konya. The potential risks threatening the buildings were determined using data from national databases and the ABC risk analysis method developed by the Canadian Conservation Institute (CCI) and the International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property (ICCROM) is used as a risk management approach. In addition, field research, oral interviews, archival and literature research were conducted. By combining all data, a holistic methodology was developed to identify potential risks threatening the buildings, their vulnerability and priority levels, and to determine the current condition of the buildings/museum collections to understand the need for preventive conservation and restoration. As a novel contribution, this study engages in comparative studies by analyzing buildings from different eras, with different materials and construction techniques, and proposes a systematic framework for heritage risk management that combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches. According to the results of the analysis, the average risk of the buildings was categorized as medium and their priority level as low. The analyses carried out were consistent with the results of the on-site observations, so the reliability of this method was considered high. In addition, the vulnerability and priority levels determined by the risk analyses and on-site observations provided accurate information on the current condition of the buildings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信