解决早期泰国铁市场的资源和现实:公元200-1450年泰国东北部武里拉姆省Ban Kruat地区的初级生产行为

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Pira Venunan, T. O. Pryce, Surapol Natapintu, Marcos Martinón-Torres
{"title":"解决早期泰国铁市场的资源和现实:公元200-1450年泰国东北部武里拉姆省Ban Kruat地区的初级生产行为","authors":"Pira Venunan,&nbsp;T. O. Pryce,&nbsp;Surapol Natapintu,&nbsp;Marcos Martinón-Torres","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02255-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Iron is something of a dichotomy in late prehistoric/early historic Mainland Southeast Asian studies. It is widely considered a substance capable of catalysing major changes in social complexity. Conversely, iron artefacts are rarely subjected to significant archaeological analysis and are generally assumed to be low value products available locally. In this paper we conduct full archaeometallurgical analysis to ancient primary iron production assemblages from Ban Kruat, Buriram Province, northeast Thailand. The attested iron production took place in a locality with extensive laterite deposits, long thought to be a source of iron. Archaeometric analysis of production remains indicates the strong likelihood that laterites were smelted to iron metal, using recipes and processes that seem to have varied little over centuries. However, as opposed to being the simple exploitation of immediately available resources, the Ban Kruat laterites were considerably richer in iron than the regional average and, furthermore, the direct bloomery reduction process employed by Ban Kruat smelters was being operated at its technical limits. To win iron from a marginal ore, the furnaces were necessarily run very hot and very reducing, which runs the risk of producing unusable cast iron, consumes vast quantities of fuel, and requires a huge labour input. Ban Kruat iron was anything but ‘cheap’. We propose that better/richer ore sources within 100–200 km were inaccessible, but such was the value of this strategic material, local populations would fulfil their iron needs at almost any cost.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving resources and reality in early Thai iron markets: Primary production behaviours at Ban Kruat District, Buriram Province, northeast Thailand c. AD 200—1450\",\"authors\":\"Pira Venunan,&nbsp;T. O. Pryce,&nbsp;Surapol Natapintu,&nbsp;Marcos Martinón-Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-025-02255-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Iron is something of a dichotomy in late prehistoric/early historic Mainland Southeast Asian studies. It is widely considered a substance capable of catalysing major changes in social complexity. Conversely, iron artefacts are rarely subjected to significant archaeological analysis and are generally assumed to be low value products available locally. In this paper we conduct full archaeometallurgical analysis to ancient primary iron production assemblages from Ban Kruat, Buriram Province, northeast Thailand. The attested iron production took place in a locality with extensive laterite deposits, long thought to be a source of iron. Archaeometric analysis of production remains indicates the strong likelihood that laterites were smelted to iron metal, using recipes and processes that seem to have varied little over centuries. However, as opposed to being the simple exploitation of immediately available resources, the Ban Kruat laterites were considerably richer in iron than the regional average and, furthermore, the direct bloomery reduction process employed by Ban Kruat smelters was being operated at its technical limits. To win iron from a marginal ore, the furnaces were necessarily run very hot and very reducing, which runs the risk of producing unusable cast iron, consumes vast quantities of fuel, and requires a huge labour input. Ban Kruat iron was anything but ‘cheap’. We propose that better/richer ore sources within 100–200 km were inaccessible, but such was the value of this strategic material, local populations would fulfil their iron needs at almost any cost.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02255-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02255-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在史前晚期/历史早期的东南亚大陆研究中,铁是一种二分法。它被广泛认为是一种能够促进社会复杂性发生重大变化的物质。相反,铁制品很少受到重要的考古分析,通常被认为是当地可获得的低价值产品。本文对泰国东北部武里拉姆省班克鲁特的古代原生铁生产组合进行了全面的考古冶金学分析。经证实的铁生产发生在一个有大量红土矿床的地方,长期以来被认为是铁的来源。对生产遗迹的考古分析表明,红土被熔炼成铁金属的可能性很大,使用的配方和工艺在几个世纪以来似乎变化不大。然而,与简单开采立即可得的资源相反,班克鲁特红土的铁含量比区域平均水平高得多,此外,班克鲁特冶炼厂所采用的直接炼红工艺已达到其技术极限。为了从边际矿石中获得铁,熔炉必须运行得非常热,并且非常低,这有可能生产出无法使用的铸铁,消耗大量的燃料,并需要大量的劳动力投入。Ban Kruat的铁一点也不“便宜”。我们建议在100-200公里范围内无法获得更好/更丰富的矿石来源,但这就是这种战略材料的价值,当地居民将几乎不惜任何代价满足他们的铁需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Resolving resources and reality in early Thai iron markets: Primary production behaviours at Ban Kruat District, Buriram Province, northeast Thailand c. AD 200—1450

Resolving resources and reality in early Thai iron markets: Primary production behaviours at Ban Kruat District, Buriram Province, northeast Thailand c. AD 200—1450

Iron is something of a dichotomy in late prehistoric/early historic Mainland Southeast Asian studies. It is widely considered a substance capable of catalysing major changes in social complexity. Conversely, iron artefacts are rarely subjected to significant archaeological analysis and are generally assumed to be low value products available locally. In this paper we conduct full archaeometallurgical analysis to ancient primary iron production assemblages from Ban Kruat, Buriram Province, northeast Thailand. The attested iron production took place in a locality with extensive laterite deposits, long thought to be a source of iron. Archaeometric analysis of production remains indicates the strong likelihood that laterites were smelted to iron metal, using recipes and processes that seem to have varied little over centuries. However, as opposed to being the simple exploitation of immediately available resources, the Ban Kruat laterites were considerably richer in iron than the regional average and, furthermore, the direct bloomery reduction process employed by Ban Kruat smelters was being operated at its technical limits. To win iron from a marginal ore, the furnaces were necessarily run very hot and very reducing, which runs the risk of producing unusable cast iron, consumes vast quantities of fuel, and requires a huge labour input. Ban Kruat iron was anything but ‘cheap’. We propose that better/richer ore sources within 100–200 km were inaccessible, but such was the value of this strategic material, local populations would fulfil their iron needs at almost any cost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信