EPHA5和SOD2基因变异及其与神经丝轻链的联系:紫杉烷诱导的埃及乳腺癌患者神经毒性的早期检测

IF 3 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Amira B. Kassem, Amira Abdelmonem Ahmed, Noha A. El‑Bassiouny, Gamal Omran, Mahmoud Mohamed Kamel, Ahmed El Bastawisy, Nermeen Nabeel Abuelsoud
{"title":"EPHA5和SOD2基因变异及其与神经丝轻链的联系:紫杉烷诱导的埃及乳腺癌患者神经毒性的早期检测","authors":"Amira B. Kassem,&nbsp;Amira Abdelmonem Ahmed,&nbsp;Noha A. El‑Bassiouny,&nbsp;Gamal Omran,&nbsp;Mahmoud Mohamed Kamel,&nbsp;Ahmed El Bastawisy,&nbsp;Nermeen Nabeel Abuelsoud","doi":"10.1186/s43094-025-00827-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with taxanes being the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. However, adverse effects like myelosuppression, neuropathy, and hypersensitivity reactions exist.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To find the association between genetic polymorphisms in SOD2 rs4880 and EPHA5 rs7349683 and taxane-induced neurotoxicity, also to prospectively evaluate the usefulness of serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) levels as an early biomarker of development neurotoxicity in different genotypes.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred breast cancer patients prospectively received taxane treatment. Blood samples were collected, and SOD2 and EPHA5 gene polymorphisms were detected using real-time PCR. All patients were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 score, and the biomarker was measured from serum using an enzyme immunosorbent assay at baseline and three months after taxanes treatment.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The detected SOD2 (rs4880) genetic polymorphisms were AA (39%), AG (49%), GG (12%), CC (49%), TC (42%), and TT (9%) in EPHA5 (rs7349683). A statistically significant difference existed between EPHA5 C &gt; T genotypes regarding the NFL levels and delta NFL (<i>p</i> value = 0.000 and 0.010<b>,</b> respectively). Also, there was a significant association between different EPHA5 C &gt; T genotypes and neurotoxicity grades post-taxanes treatment (<i>p</i> value = 0.010). There was a statistically significant difference in fatigue associated with the EPHA5 gene (<i>p</i> value = 0.011).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Detecting EPHA5 genetic polymorphisms before administering taxanes is highly recommended for assessing neurotoxicity risk. NFL measurement is recommended to be used in the early identification of taxane-induced neurotoxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":577,"journal":{"name":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-025-00827-1","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EPHA5 and SOD2 genetic variants and their link to neurofilament light chain: early detection of taxane-induced neurotoxicity in Egyptian breast cancer patients\",\"authors\":\"Amira B. Kassem,&nbsp;Amira Abdelmonem Ahmed,&nbsp;Noha A. El‑Bassiouny,&nbsp;Gamal Omran,&nbsp;Mahmoud Mohamed Kamel,&nbsp;Ahmed El Bastawisy,&nbsp;Nermeen Nabeel Abuelsoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43094-025-00827-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with taxanes being the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. However, adverse effects like myelosuppression, neuropathy, and hypersensitivity reactions exist.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To find the association between genetic polymorphisms in SOD2 rs4880 and EPHA5 rs7349683 and taxane-induced neurotoxicity, also to prospectively evaluate the usefulness of serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) levels as an early biomarker of development neurotoxicity in different genotypes.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred breast cancer patients prospectively received taxane treatment. Blood samples were collected, and SOD2 and EPHA5 gene polymorphisms were detected using real-time PCR. All patients were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 score, and the biomarker was measured from serum using an enzyme immunosorbent assay at baseline and three months after taxanes treatment.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The detected SOD2 (rs4880) genetic polymorphisms were AA (39%), AG (49%), GG (12%), CC (49%), TC (42%), and TT (9%) in EPHA5 (rs7349683). A statistically significant difference existed between EPHA5 C &gt; T genotypes regarding the NFL levels and delta NFL (<i>p</i> value = 0.000 and 0.010<b>,</b> respectively). Also, there was a significant association between different EPHA5 C &gt; T genotypes and neurotoxicity grades post-taxanes treatment (<i>p</i> value = 0.010). There was a statistically significant difference in fatigue associated with the EPHA5 gene (<i>p</i> value = 0.011).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Detecting EPHA5 genetic polymorphisms before administering taxanes is highly recommended for assessing neurotoxicity risk. NFL measurement is recommended to be used in the early identification of taxane-induced neurotoxicity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-025-00827-1\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-025-00827-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-025-00827-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

乳腺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,紫杉烷是最常用的化疗药物。然而,不良反应如骨髓抑制,神经病变和过敏反应存在。目的探讨SOD2 rs4880和EPHA5 rs7349683基因多态性与紫杉烷诱导的神经毒性的关系,并前瞻性评价血清神经丝轻链(sNFL)水平作为不同基因型发育性神经毒性的早期生物标志物的价值。方法对100例乳腺癌患者进行紫杉烷治疗。采集血样,采用实时荧光定量PCR检测SOD2和EPHA5基因多态性。所有患者使用不良事件通用术语标准v 5.0评分进行评估,并在基线和紫杉烷治疗后三个月使用酶免疫吸附法从血清中测量生物标志物。结果在EPHA5 (rs7349683)中检测到的SOD2 (rs4880)基因多态性分别为AA(39%)、AG(49%)、GG(12%)、CC(49%)、TC(42%)和TT(9%)。EPHA5 C和gt; T基因型之间的NFL水平和δ NFL差异有统计学意义(p值分别为0.000和0.010)。此外,不同EPHA5 C >; T基因型与紫杉烷治疗后神经毒性等级之间存在显著相关性(p值= 0.010)。EPHA5基因与疲劳相关差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.011)。结论建议在给药前检测EPHA5基因多态性,以评估神经毒性风险。建议使用NFL测量来早期识别紫杉烷诱导的神经毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EPHA5 and SOD2 genetic variants and their link to neurofilament light chain: early detection of taxane-induced neurotoxicity in Egyptian breast cancer patients

Background

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with taxanes being the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. However, adverse effects like myelosuppression, neuropathy, and hypersensitivity reactions exist.

Objective

To find the association between genetic polymorphisms in SOD2 rs4880 and EPHA5 rs7349683 and taxane-induced neurotoxicity, also to prospectively evaluate the usefulness of serum neurofilament light chain (sNFL) levels as an early biomarker of development neurotoxicity in different genotypes.

Methods

One hundred breast cancer patients prospectively received taxane treatment. Blood samples were collected, and SOD2 and EPHA5 gene polymorphisms were detected using real-time PCR. All patients were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 score, and the biomarker was measured from serum using an enzyme immunosorbent assay at baseline and three months after taxanes treatment.

Results

The detected SOD2 (rs4880) genetic polymorphisms were AA (39%), AG (49%), GG (12%), CC (49%), TC (42%), and TT (9%) in EPHA5 (rs7349683). A statistically significant difference existed between EPHA5 C > T genotypes regarding the NFL levels and delta NFL (p value = 0.000 and 0.010, respectively). Also, there was a significant association between different EPHA5 C > T genotypes and neurotoxicity grades post-taxanes treatment (p value = 0.010). There was a statistically significant difference in fatigue associated with the EPHA5 gene (p value = 0.011).

Conclusion

Detecting EPHA5 genetic polymorphisms before administering taxanes is highly recommended for assessing neurotoxicity risk. NFL measurement is recommended to be used in the early identification of taxane-induced neurotoxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FJPS) is the official journal of the Future University in Egypt. It is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and case studies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences and technologies, pharmacy practice and related clinical aspects, and pharmacy education. The journal publishes articles covering developments in drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, drug delivery systems, drug targeting and nano-technology. It also covers development of new systems, methods and techniques in pharmacy education and practice. The scope of the journal also extends to cover advancements in toxicology, cell and molecular biology, biomedical research, clinical and pharmaceutical microbiology, pharmaceutical biotechnology, medicinal chemistry, phytochemistry and nutraceuticals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信