考虑游憩品质的居民与城市公共绿地的现实分配

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Amirmohammad Ghavimi, Annika Bonerath, Jan-Henrik Haunert
{"title":"考虑游憩品质的居民与城市公共绿地的现实分配","authors":"Amirmohammad Ghavimi,&nbsp;Annika Bonerath,&nbsp;Jan-Henrik Haunert","doi":"10.1007/s12061-025-09690-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ensuring the quality of urban life necessitates the provision of urban public green spaces (UPGSs) in ample measure. These UPGSs serve as critical components of urban environments, contributing to the well-being and sustainability of cities. Hence, urban planners and decision-makers need to evaluate this supply. A recent method for such an evaluation is based on an optimal assignment between the residents and the UPGSs of an urban area. The method constrains the assignment such that the capacities of the UPGSs (i.e., the number of residents they can supply) are respected. These capacities are assumed to be proportional to size. In this study, we challenge and relax the prevailing assumption, redefining its constraints for a more accurate evaluation of UPGS capacities. We propose a novel approach for modeling the capacity of urban public green spaces (UPGS) by incorporating ten supplementary recreational criteria, including: responsiveness, safety and security, variety of activities, social interactions, residents’ perception, facilities, symbolic value, water body, aesthetic value, and connectivity, which we quantify using data derived from social media platforms. Our experiments show that the new model yields assignments that are more consistent with the actual use of UPGSs by residents. This innovative methodology allows us to gain deeper insights into the multifaceted aspects that influence the utilization and potential of UPGSs, paving the way for more informed and data-driven decision-making in urban planning and design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46392,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","volume":"18 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12061-025-09690-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Realistic Assignments Between Residents and Urban Public Green Spaces by Considering the Recreational Quality\",\"authors\":\"Amirmohammad Ghavimi,&nbsp;Annika Bonerath,&nbsp;Jan-Henrik Haunert\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12061-025-09690-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ensuring the quality of urban life necessitates the provision of urban public green spaces (UPGSs) in ample measure. These UPGSs serve as critical components of urban environments, contributing to the well-being and sustainability of cities. Hence, urban planners and decision-makers need to evaluate this supply. A recent method for such an evaluation is based on an optimal assignment between the residents and the UPGSs of an urban area. The method constrains the assignment such that the capacities of the UPGSs (i.e., the number of residents they can supply) are respected. These capacities are assumed to be proportional to size. In this study, we challenge and relax the prevailing assumption, redefining its constraints for a more accurate evaluation of UPGS capacities. We propose a novel approach for modeling the capacity of urban public green spaces (UPGS) by incorporating ten supplementary recreational criteria, including: responsiveness, safety and security, variety of activities, social interactions, residents’ perception, facilities, symbolic value, water body, aesthetic value, and connectivity, which we quantify using data derived from social media platforms. Our experiments show that the new model yields assignments that are more consistent with the actual use of UPGSs by residents. This innovative methodology allows us to gain deeper insights into the multifaceted aspects that influence the utilization and potential of UPGSs, paving the way for more informed and data-driven decision-making in urban planning and design.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12061-025-09690-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09690-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12061-025-09690-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为确保城市生活质素,必须提供足够的城市公共绿地。这些upgs是城市环境的重要组成部分,有助于城市的福祉和可持续性。因此,城市规划者和决策者需要评估这种供应。最近的一种评估方法是基于城市地区的居民和UPGSs之间的最佳分配。该方法对分配进行了约束,使UPGSs的容量(即它们可以供应的居民数量)得到尊重。假定这些容量与大小成正比。在本研究中,我们挑战并放宽了普遍的假设,重新定义了其约束条件,以便更准确地评估UPGS的能力。我们提出了一种新的方法来模拟城市公共绿地(UPGS)的能力,通过结合十个补充娱乐标准,包括:响应性、安全性、活动多样性、社会互动、居民感知、设施、象征价值、水体、审美价值和连通性,我们使用来自社交媒体平台的数据来量化这些标准。我们的实验表明,新模型产生的分配更符合居民对upgs的实际使用。这种创新的方法使我们能够更深入地了解影响upgs利用和潜力的多方面因素,为在城市规划和设计中做出更明智和数据驱动的决策铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards Realistic Assignments Between Residents and Urban Public Green Spaces by Considering the Recreational Quality

Ensuring the quality of urban life necessitates the provision of urban public green spaces (UPGSs) in ample measure. These UPGSs serve as critical components of urban environments, contributing to the well-being and sustainability of cities. Hence, urban planners and decision-makers need to evaluate this supply. A recent method for such an evaluation is based on an optimal assignment between the residents and the UPGSs of an urban area. The method constrains the assignment such that the capacities of the UPGSs (i.e., the number of residents they can supply) are respected. These capacities are assumed to be proportional to size. In this study, we challenge and relax the prevailing assumption, redefining its constraints for a more accurate evaluation of UPGS capacities. We propose a novel approach for modeling the capacity of urban public green spaces (UPGS) by incorporating ten supplementary recreational criteria, including: responsiveness, safety and security, variety of activities, social interactions, residents’ perception, facilities, symbolic value, water body, aesthetic value, and connectivity, which we quantify using data derived from social media platforms. Our experiments show that the new model yields assignments that are more consistent with the actual use of UPGSs by residents. This innovative methodology allows us to gain deeper insights into the multifaceted aspects that influence the utilization and potential of UPGSs, paving the way for more informed and data-driven decision-making in urban planning and design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Description The journal has an applied focus: it actively promotes the importance of geographical research in real world settings It is policy-relevant: it seeks both a readership and contributions from practitioners as well as academics The substantive foundation is spatial analysis: the use of quantitative techniques to identify patterns and processes within geographic environments The combination of these points, which are fully reflected in the naming of the journal, establishes a unique position in the marketplace. RationaleA geographical perspective has always been crucial to the understanding of the social and physical organisation of the world around us. The techniques of spatial analysis provide a powerful means for the assembly and interpretation of evidence, and thus to address critical questions about issues such as crime and deprivation, immigration and demographic restructuring, retailing activity and employment change, resource management and environmental improvement. Many of these issues are equally important to academic research as they are to policy makers and Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy aims to close the gap between these two perspectives by providing a forum for discussion of applied research in a range of different contexts  Topical and interdisciplinaryIncreasingly government organisations, administrative agencies and private businesses are requiring research to support their ‘evidence-based’ strategies or policies. Geographical location is critical in much of this work which extends across a wide range of disciplines including demography, actuarial sciences, statistics, public sector planning, business planning, economics, epidemiology, sociology, social policy, health research, environmental management.   FocusApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy will draw on applied research from diverse problem domains, such as transport, policing, education, health, environment and leisure, in different international contexts. The journal will therefore provide insights into the variations in phenomena that exist across space, it will provide evidence for comparative policy analysis between domains and between locations, and stimulate ideas about the translation of spatial analysis methods and techniques across varied policy contexts. It is essential to know how to measure, monitor and understand spatial distributions, many of which have implications for those with responsibility to plan and enhance the society and the environment in which we all exist.   Readership and Editorial BoardAs a journal focused on applications of methods of spatial analysis, Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy will be of interest to scholars and students in a wide range of academic fields, to practitioners in government and administrative agencies and to consultants in private sector organisations. The Editorial Board reflects the international and multidisciplinary nature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信