通过德国和法国档案系统的例子说明了对档案的特权访问和研究的兴趣

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Mikuláš Čtvrtník
{"title":"通过德国和法国档案系统的例子说明了对档案的特权访问和研究的兴趣","authors":"Mikuláš Čtvrtník","doi":"10.1007/s10502-025-09493-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study addresses the issue of the possibility of specific access to public archives, particularly for the purposes of research or other scholarly purposes, not exclusively of official nature. This specific phenomenon is sometimes referred to as “privileged access to archives”. However, such access to archives subject to different than general access rules is only justified if it serves as a specific tool for balancing, on the one hand, the right of free access to information and, on the other, the need to protect the personality rights and privacy of the persons in the records. National archival legislations deal with this matter in a variety of ways. Some countries open the door to privileged access to archives, especially for research purposes wider, others not so wide. Most often, however, they introduce certain, albeit usually very limited, possibilities for exclusive access to archival records. This article analyses models from the French and German archival systems and shows how such privileged access, especially for research purposes, is applied in local archival law and in the practice of some archives in these two countries. It discusses the pros and cons of each solution, their benefits and applicability as well as their risks. The study seeks answers to the question whether privileged access to archives constitutes a violation of fundamental democratic principles and equal access to citizens, or if, on the contrary, it is a necessary tool to guarantee balance between the protection of personality rights and privacy and the right of access to information, freedom of study and research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privileged access to archives and the interest of research illustrated by the examples of German and French archival systems\",\"authors\":\"Mikuláš Čtvrtník\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-025-09493-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study addresses the issue of the possibility of specific access to public archives, particularly for the purposes of research or other scholarly purposes, not exclusively of official nature. This specific phenomenon is sometimes referred to as “privileged access to archives”. However, such access to archives subject to different than general access rules is only justified if it serves as a specific tool for balancing, on the one hand, the right of free access to information and, on the other, the need to protect the personality rights and privacy of the persons in the records. National archival legislations deal with this matter in a variety of ways. Some countries open the door to privileged access to archives, especially for research purposes wider, others not so wide. Most often, however, they introduce certain, albeit usually very limited, possibilities for exclusive access to archival records. This article analyses models from the French and German archival systems and shows how such privileged access, especially for research purposes, is applied in local archival law and in the practice of some archives in these two countries. It discusses the pros and cons of each solution, their benefits and applicability as well as their risks. The study seeks answers to the question whether privileged access to archives constitutes a violation of fundamental democratic principles and equal access to citizens, or if, on the contrary, it is a necessary tool to guarantee balance between the protection of personality rights and privacy and the right of access to information, freedom of study and research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09493-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-025-09493-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究讨论了具体访问公共档案的可能性问题,特别是为了研究或其他学术目的,而不仅仅是官方性质。这种特殊现象有时被称为“特权查阅档案”。但是,这种根据不同于一般查阅规则查阅档案的做法,只有在作为一种具体的工具来平衡一方面是自由查阅资料的权利,另一方面是保护记录中的人的人格权和隐私权的需要时,才有理由。国家档案立法以各种方式处理这一问题。有些国家对档案的特权开放得更大,尤其是出于研究目的,有些国家则没有这么宽。然而,在大多数情况下,它们引入了某些(尽管通常是非常有限的)对档案记录的独家访问的可能性。本文分析了法国和德国档案制度的模式,并展示了这种特权访问,特别是为了研究目的,是如何在这两个国家的地方档案法和一些档案馆的实践中应用的。它讨论了每个解决方案的优缺点,它们的好处和适用性以及它们的风险。这项研究试图回答这样一个问题,即特权查阅档案是否违反了基本的民主原则和平等查阅公民的权利,或者相反,它是否是保证保护人格权和隐私权与获得信息、学习和研究自由的权利之间的平衡的必要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Privileged access to archives and the interest of research illustrated by the examples of German and French archival systems

The study addresses the issue of the possibility of specific access to public archives, particularly for the purposes of research or other scholarly purposes, not exclusively of official nature. This specific phenomenon is sometimes referred to as “privileged access to archives”. However, such access to archives subject to different than general access rules is only justified if it serves as a specific tool for balancing, on the one hand, the right of free access to information and, on the other, the need to protect the personality rights and privacy of the persons in the records. National archival legislations deal with this matter in a variety of ways. Some countries open the door to privileged access to archives, especially for research purposes wider, others not so wide. Most often, however, they introduce certain, albeit usually very limited, possibilities for exclusive access to archival records. This article analyses models from the French and German archival systems and shows how such privileged access, especially for research purposes, is applied in local archival law and in the practice of some archives in these two countries. It discusses the pros and cons of each solution, their benefits and applicability as well as their risks. The study seeks answers to the question whether privileged access to archives constitutes a violation of fundamental democratic principles and equal access to citizens, or if, on the contrary, it is a necessary tool to guarantee balance between the protection of personality rights and privacy and the right of access to information, freedom of study and research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信