胶粘剂和粘附体顺应性对3d打印零件失效的影响

IF 2.5 4区 材料科学 Q2 METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING
Özkan Öz, Fatih Huzeyfe Öztürk
{"title":"胶粘剂和粘附体顺应性对3d打印零件失效的影响","authors":"Özkan Öz,&nbsp;Fatih Huzeyfe Öztürk","doi":"10.1007/s40194-025-02048-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study deals with the adhesive selection for extrusion-based 3D-printed parts. The compatibility of acrylate (AC), polyurethane (PU), methyl methacrylate (MM) and epoxy (EP) adhesives with polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) adherends was investigated. Tensile tests were conducted to provide enhanced knowledge on the failure behavior of these joints. Taguchi L16 orthogonal array and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to the design of experiment (DOE) and to identify the contribution of each parameter on the response, respectively. In addition, a closed-form solution of critical stress (peel and shear stresses) distributions along the bondline was used to gain a better insight into the failure mechanism of joints considered in this study. The ANOVA results showed that the effect of adhesive type is clearly the most important factor influencing the joint strength, followed by the adherend type. Statistically, the contribution of the adherend type (5.28%) is also important, but it is smaller than the contribution of the adhesive type (91.60%). The highest joint strength was obtained for PETG bonded with MM adhesive. In the case of PU, EP, and AC adhesives, the maximum load-carrying capacity was reached using PLA adherends. ASA showed the lowest joint strength for all adhesive types. This research provides comprehensive knowledge, allowing designers to select an appropriate adhesive for custom or industrial bonding applications without time-consuming surface treatments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":809,"journal":{"name":"Welding in the World","volume":"69 9","pages":"2869 - 2883"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-025-02048-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of adhesive and adherend compliance on the failure of 3D-printed parts\",\"authors\":\"Özkan Öz,&nbsp;Fatih Huzeyfe Öztürk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40194-025-02048-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study deals with the adhesive selection for extrusion-based 3D-printed parts. The compatibility of acrylate (AC), polyurethane (PU), methyl methacrylate (MM) and epoxy (EP) adhesives with polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) adherends was investigated. Tensile tests were conducted to provide enhanced knowledge on the failure behavior of these joints. Taguchi L16 orthogonal array and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to the design of experiment (DOE) and to identify the contribution of each parameter on the response, respectively. In addition, a closed-form solution of critical stress (peel and shear stresses) distributions along the bondline was used to gain a better insight into the failure mechanism of joints considered in this study. The ANOVA results showed that the effect of adhesive type is clearly the most important factor influencing the joint strength, followed by the adherend type. Statistically, the contribution of the adherend type (5.28%) is also important, but it is smaller than the contribution of the adhesive type (91.60%). The highest joint strength was obtained for PETG bonded with MM adhesive. In the case of PU, EP, and AC adhesives, the maximum load-carrying capacity was reached using PLA adherends. ASA showed the lowest joint strength for all adhesive types. This research provides comprehensive knowledge, allowing designers to select an appropriate adhesive for custom or industrial bonding applications without time-consuming surface treatments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Welding in the World\",\"volume\":\"69 9\",\"pages\":\"2869 - 2883\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40194-025-02048-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Welding in the World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40194-025-02048-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Welding in the World","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40194-025-02048-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究涉及基于挤压的3d打印部件的粘合剂选择。研究了丙烯酸酯(AC)、聚氨酯(PU)、甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MM)和环氧树脂(EP)胶粘剂与聚乳酸(PLA)、聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PETG)、丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)和丙烯腈-苯乙烯-丙烯酸酯(ASA)胶粘剂的相容性。进行拉伸试验是为了更好地了解这些接头的破坏行为。采用田口L16正交试验设计(DOE)和方差分析(ANOVA)分别确定各参数对响应的贡献。此外,为了更好地了解本研究中所考虑的接头的破坏机制,采用了沿结合线的临界应力(剥离应力和剪切应力)分布的封闭解。方差分析结果表明,粘结剂类型是影响接头强度的最重要因素,其次是粘结剂类型。统计上,粘附型的贡献(5.28%)也很重要,但小于粘附型的贡献(91.60%)。PETG与MM胶粘剂的结合强度最高。在PU, EP和AC胶粘剂的情况下,使用PLA胶粘剂达到最大承载能力。ASA显示所有胶粘剂类型的接头强度最低。这项研究提供了全面的知识,允许设计人员为定制或工业粘合应用选择合适的粘合剂,而无需耗时的表面处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of adhesive and adherend compliance on the failure of 3D-printed parts

The present study deals with the adhesive selection for extrusion-based 3D-printed parts. The compatibility of acrylate (AC), polyurethane (PU), methyl methacrylate (MM) and epoxy (EP) adhesives with polylactic acid (PLA), polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) adherends was investigated. Tensile tests were conducted to provide enhanced knowledge on the failure behavior of these joints. Taguchi L16 orthogonal array and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to the design of experiment (DOE) and to identify the contribution of each parameter on the response, respectively. In addition, a closed-form solution of critical stress (peel and shear stresses) distributions along the bondline was used to gain a better insight into the failure mechanism of joints considered in this study. The ANOVA results showed that the effect of adhesive type is clearly the most important factor influencing the joint strength, followed by the adherend type. Statistically, the contribution of the adherend type (5.28%) is also important, but it is smaller than the contribution of the adhesive type (91.60%). The highest joint strength was obtained for PETG bonded with MM adhesive. In the case of PU, EP, and AC adhesives, the maximum load-carrying capacity was reached using PLA adherends. ASA showed the lowest joint strength for all adhesive types. This research provides comprehensive knowledge, allowing designers to select an appropriate adhesive for custom or industrial bonding applications without time-consuming surface treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Welding in the World
Welding in the World METALLURGY & METALLURGICAL ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Welding in the World publishes authoritative papers on every aspect of materials joining, including welding, brazing, soldering, cutting, thermal spraying and allied joining and fabrication techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信