基于视觉的两种混合模式裂缝参数提取方法:组合场法与传统方法的比较

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING
A. Edwards, J. Cho, H. Tippur
{"title":"基于视觉的两种混合模式裂缝参数提取方法:组合场法与传统方法的比较","authors":"A. Edwards,&nbsp;J. Cho,&nbsp;H. Tippur","doi":"10.1007/s11340-025-01164-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over-deterministic least-squares methods of extracting SIFs from measured full-field quantities in conjunction with asymptotic fields has been the mainstay of experimental fracture mechanics. The vision-based methods of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to determine displacements and Digital Gradient Sensing (DGS) to determine stress gradients have played an important role in this regard.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In DIC and DGS, two or more orthogonal fields are measured simultaneously. Yet, while extracting SIFs, often only one of the components is picked based on intuition/legacy. This could result in erroneous SIF values under mixed-mode conditions.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Robustness of SIF extraction by utilizing all components in tandem is demonstrated over a wide range of pure- and mixed-mode conditions. An edge-notched semi-circular specimen geometry is used to create different mode-mixities. The data from DIC and DGS are processed using both the combined fields and legacy approaches. The accuracy and robustness of the former relative to the latter is demonstrated for (a) different number of higher order terms in the asymptotic series, (b) crack tip location uncertainty, and (c) different regions of data extraction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>An order of magnitude reduction in standard deviation and root-mean-squared error in mixed and pure mode SIFs are seen for DIC and the combined fields method. Marginal improvements are seen when the crack tip position or the region of interest are varied in DGS.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Robustness of extracting mixed-mode SIFs accurately by employing all measured fields concurrently in an over-deterministic least-squares approach is superior to using a single component based on intuition/legacy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":552,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Mechanics","volume":"65 6","pages":"845 - 868"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracting Mixed-Mode Fracture Parameters Using Two Vision-based Methods: Comparison of Combined Fields Method with Legacy Approach\",\"authors\":\"A. Edwards,&nbsp;J. Cho,&nbsp;H. Tippur\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11340-025-01164-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over-deterministic least-squares methods of extracting SIFs from measured full-field quantities in conjunction with asymptotic fields has been the mainstay of experimental fracture mechanics. The vision-based methods of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to determine displacements and Digital Gradient Sensing (DGS) to determine stress gradients have played an important role in this regard.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>In DIC and DGS, two or more orthogonal fields are measured simultaneously. Yet, while extracting SIFs, often only one of the components is picked based on intuition/legacy. This could result in erroneous SIF values under mixed-mode conditions.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Robustness of SIF extraction by utilizing all components in tandem is demonstrated over a wide range of pure- and mixed-mode conditions. An edge-notched semi-circular specimen geometry is used to create different mode-mixities. The data from DIC and DGS are processed using both the combined fields and legacy approaches. The accuracy and robustness of the former relative to the latter is demonstrated for (a) different number of higher order terms in the asymptotic series, (b) crack tip location uncertainty, and (c) different regions of data extraction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>An order of magnitude reduction in standard deviation and root-mean-squared error in mixed and pure mode SIFs are seen for DIC and the combined fields method. Marginal improvements are seen when the crack tip position or the region of interest are varied in DGS.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Robustness of extracting mixed-mode SIFs accurately by employing all measured fields concurrently in an over-deterministic least-squares approach is superior to using a single component based on intuition/legacy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"65 6\",\"pages\":\"845 - 868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-025-01164-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11340-025-01164-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结合渐近场从测量的全场量中提取SIFs的多确定性最小二乘方法一直是实验断裂力学的主要方法。基于视觉的数字图像相关(DIC)确定位移和数字梯度传感(DGS)确定应力梯度的方法在这方面发挥了重要作用。目的在DIC和DGS中,同时测量两个或多个正交场。然而,在提取sif时,通常只根据直觉/遗留选择一个组件。在混合模式条件下,这可能导致错误的SIF值。方法在广泛的纯模式和混合模式条件下,利用所有组件串联提取SIF的鲁棒性得到了证明。一个边缘缺口的半圆形试样几何形状被用来创建不同的模式混合物。来自DIC和DGS的数据使用组合字段和遗留方法进行处理。对于(a)渐近序列中不同数量的高阶项,(b)裂纹尖端位置的不确定性,以及(c)数据提取的不同区域,前者相对于后者的准确性和鲁棒性得到了证明。结果DIC和组合场方法在混合模式和纯模式SIFs中的标准差和均方根误差都降低了一个数量级。当裂纹尖端位置或感兴趣的区域在DGS中变化时,可以看到边际改进。结论:在过度确定性最小二乘方法中,通过同时使用所有测量场来准确提取混合模式SIFs的鲁棒性优于使用基于直觉/遗留的单一分量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extracting Mixed-Mode Fracture Parameters Using Two Vision-based Methods: Comparison of Combined Fields Method with Legacy Approach

Background

Over-deterministic least-squares methods of extracting SIFs from measured full-field quantities in conjunction with asymptotic fields has been the mainstay of experimental fracture mechanics. The vision-based methods of Digital Image Correlation (DIC) to determine displacements and Digital Gradient Sensing (DGS) to determine stress gradients have played an important role in this regard.

Objectives

In DIC and DGS, two or more orthogonal fields are measured simultaneously. Yet, while extracting SIFs, often only one of the components is picked based on intuition/legacy. This could result in erroneous SIF values under mixed-mode conditions.

Methods

Robustness of SIF extraction by utilizing all components in tandem is demonstrated over a wide range of pure- and mixed-mode conditions. An edge-notched semi-circular specimen geometry is used to create different mode-mixities. The data from DIC and DGS are processed using both the combined fields and legacy approaches. The accuracy and robustness of the former relative to the latter is demonstrated for (a) different number of higher order terms in the asymptotic series, (b) crack tip location uncertainty, and (c) different regions of data extraction.

Results

An order of magnitude reduction in standard deviation and root-mean-squared error in mixed and pure mode SIFs are seen for DIC and the combined fields method. Marginal improvements are seen when the crack tip position or the region of interest are varied in DGS.

Conclusions

Robustness of extracting mixed-mode SIFs accurately by employing all measured fields concurrently in an over-deterministic least-squares approach is superior to using a single component based on intuition/legacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Mechanics
Experimental Mechanics 物理-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Mechanics is the official journal of the Society for Experimental Mechanics that publishes papers in all areas of experimentation including its theoretical and computational analysis. The journal covers research in design and implementation of novel or improved experiments to characterize materials, structures and systems. Articles extending the frontiers of experimental mechanics at large and small scales are particularly welcome. Coverage extends from research in solid and fluids mechanics to fields at the intersection of disciplines including physics, chemistry and biology. Development of new devices and technologies for metrology applications in a wide range of industrial sectors (e.g., manufacturing, high-performance materials, aerospace, information technology, medicine, energy and environmental technologies) is also covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信