Xingchen Yang, Zhenli Yan, Chaojun Du, Zigao Zhao, Yujie Chen, Haoran Wu, Huanhuan Zhang, Chun Chang
{"title":"整合第一代和第二代小麦和麦秸联合生产生物乙醇:技术经济可行性和生命周期评估","authors":"Xingchen Yang, Zhenli Yan, Chaojun Du, Zigao Zhao, Yujie Chen, Haoran Wu, Huanhuan Zhang, Chun Chang","doi":"10.1007/s11705-025-2573-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility and environmental implications of integrating first-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) bioethanol co-production using wheat grain and wheat straw (WS) as feedstocks. Three pretreatment methods—formic acid, sodium chlorite, and alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP)—were investigated, with AHP identified as the most industrially viable due to its mild conditions, high cellulose retention (73%), and reduced wastewater generation. The results indicated that the integrated 1G + 2G process exhibited high bioethanol production capacity (241300 t·y<sup>−1</sup>) and mass yield (22.74%) under the conditions of 1200 t·d<sup>−1</sup> of wheat and 2000 t·d<sup>−1</sup> of WS. Furthermore, an energy recovery potential of 60.51%, alongside a 60.65% reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions could be achieved. 1G + 2G process has a competitive minimum ethanol selling price (MESP: $431·t<sup>−1</sup>), high internal rate of return (37%), and return on investment (76%). Life cycle assessment highlighted terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (35%) and freshwater ecotoxicity potential (32%) as dominant environmental impacts, driven by nitrogen fertilizer use and fuel combustion efficiency. Sensitivity analysis showed feedstock costs and ethanol pricing as critical economic drivers, while reducing nitrogen fertilizer application and optimizing combustion efficiency were key to mitigating environmental burdens. This work provides actionable insights for advancing integrated biorefineries with enhanced yield, economic viability, and sustainability.\n</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":571,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering","volume":"19 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating the first- and second-generation bioethanol co-production from wheat and wheat straw process: techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment\",\"authors\":\"Xingchen Yang, Zhenli Yan, Chaojun Du, Zigao Zhao, Yujie Chen, Haoran Wu, Huanhuan Zhang, Chun Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11705-025-2573-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility and environmental implications of integrating first-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) bioethanol co-production using wheat grain and wheat straw (WS) as feedstocks. Three pretreatment methods—formic acid, sodium chlorite, and alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP)—were investigated, with AHP identified as the most industrially viable due to its mild conditions, high cellulose retention (73%), and reduced wastewater generation. The results indicated that the integrated 1G + 2G process exhibited high bioethanol production capacity (241300 t·y<sup>−1</sup>) and mass yield (22.74%) under the conditions of 1200 t·d<sup>−1</sup> of wheat and 2000 t·d<sup>−1</sup> of WS. Furthermore, an energy recovery potential of 60.51%, alongside a 60.65% reduction in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions could be achieved. 1G + 2G process has a competitive minimum ethanol selling price (MESP: $431·t<sup>−1</sup>), high internal rate of return (37%), and return on investment (76%). Life cycle assessment highlighted terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (35%) and freshwater ecotoxicity potential (32%) as dominant environmental impacts, driven by nitrogen fertilizer use and fuel combustion efficiency. Sensitivity analysis showed feedstock costs and ethanol pricing as critical economic drivers, while reducing nitrogen fertilizer application and optimizing combustion efficiency were key to mitigating environmental burdens. This work provides actionable insights for advancing integrated biorefineries with enhanced yield, economic viability, and sustainability.\\n</p><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"19 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11705-025-2573-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11705-025-2573-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Integrating the first- and second-generation bioethanol co-production from wheat and wheat straw process: techno-economic feasibility and life cycle assessment
This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility and environmental implications of integrating first-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) bioethanol co-production using wheat grain and wheat straw (WS) as feedstocks. Three pretreatment methods—formic acid, sodium chlorite, and alkaline hydrogen peroxide (AHP)—were investigated, with AHP identified as the most industrially viable due to its mild conditions, high cellulose retention (73%), and reduced wastewater generation. The results indicated that the integrated 1G + 2G process exhibited high bioethanol production capacity (241300 t·y−1) and mass yield (22.74%) under the conditions of 1200 t·d−1 of wheat and 2000 t·d−1 of WS. Furthermore, an energy recovery potential of 60.51%, alongside a 60.65% reduction in CO2 emissions could be achieved. 1G + 2G process has a competitive minimum ethanol selling price (MESP: $431·t−1), high internal rate of return (37%), and return on investment (76%). Life cycle assessment highlighted terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (35%) and freshwater ecotoxicity potential (32%) as dominant environmental impacts, driven by nitrogen fertilizer use and fuel combustion efficiency. Sensitivity analysis showed feedstock costs and ethanol pricing as critical economic drivers, while reducing nitrogen fertilizer application and optimizing combustion efficiency were key to mitigating environmental burdens. This work provides actionable insights for advancing integrated biorefineries with enhanced yield, economic viability, and sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering presents the latest developments in chemical science and engineering, emphasizing emerging and multidisciplinary fields and international trends in research and development. The journal promotes communication and exchange between scientists all over the world. The contents include original reviews, research papers and short communications. Coverage includes catalysis and reaction engineering, clean energy, functional material, nanotechnology and nanoscience, biomaterials and biotechnology, particle technology and multiphase processing, separation science and technology, sustainable technologies and green processing.