锂离子电池容量预测的机器学习技术对比分析

IF 2.6 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Ionics Pub Date : 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s11581-025-06359-1
Bhimireddy Lakshminarayana, Satyavir Singh, Tasadeek Hassan Dar
{"title":"锂离子电池容量预测的机器学习技术对比分析","authors":"Bhimireddy Lakshminarayana,&nbsp;Satyavir Singh,&nbsp;Tasadeek Hassan Dar","doi":"10.1007/s11581-025-06359-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predicting battery capacity is essential for enhancing battery management systems (BMSs), ensuring safety, and extending battery life. However, lithium-ion battery faces the challenge of performance degradation over the period due to electrochemical phenomena. It can be addressed with data-driven techniques to estimate the battery capacity and remaining useful life (RUL). The machine learning (ML) algorithm efficacy directly impacted by the data types. NASA and CALCE datasets are used to validate the applicability of ML algorithms. The dataset are divided into training and testing sets based on charged-discharged cycles. Pretraining datasets are tested in time series with forward prediction judgment of the data size to predict RUL. There may be an overfitting or underfitting problems in estimating capacity of the battery. However, such problems can be addressed with proper tuning of hyperparameters in time series model with, number of trees, maximum depth of the tree and splitting the data points. As data may be noisy or nonlinear, in most cases, RF prevents overfitting or underfitting by building multiple decision trees which reduces the variance and increases accuracy. RF achieves comparable prediction accuracy, even when trained on limited data as compared to existing data-driven techniques in terms of error metrics RMSE, MSE, MAPE, and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>. The findings highlight RF as a preferred choice with an average RMSE error reduced to 5.66E-16 and predict the battery RUL maximum error in four cycles to lithium-ion battery. These techniques may provide robustness to BMS in real-time applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":599,"journal":{"name":"Ionics","volume":"31 7","pages":"6851 - 6863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for lithium-ion battery capacity prediction\",\"authors\":\"Bhimireddy Lakshminarayana,&nbsp;Satyavir Singh,&nbsp;Tasadeek Hassan Dar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11581-025-06359-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Predicting battery capacity is essential for enhancing battery management systems (BMSs), ensuring safety, and extending battery life. However, lithium-ion battery faces the challenge of performance degradation over the period due to electrochemical phenomena. It can be addressed with data-driven techniques to estimate the battery capacity and remaining useful life (RUL). The machine learning (ML) algorithm efficacy directly impacted by the data types. NASA and CALCE datasets are used to validate the applicability of ML algorithms. The dataset are divided into training and testing sets based on charged-discharged cycles. Pretraining datasets are tested in time series with forward prediction judgment of the data size to predict RUL. There may be an overfitting or underfitting problems in estimating capacity of the battery. However, such problems can be addressed with proper tuning of hyperparameters in time series model with, number of trees, maximum depth of the tree and splitting the data points. As data may be noisy or nonlinear, in most cases, RF prevents overfitting or underfitting by building multiple decision trees which reduces the variance and increases accuracy. RF achieves comparable prediction accuracy, even when trained on limited data as compared to existing data-driven techniques in terms of error metrics RMSE, MSE, MAPE, and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup>. The findings highlight RF as a preferred choice with an average RMSE error reduced to 5.66E-16 and predict the battery RUL maximum error in four cycles to lithium-ion battery. These techniques may provide robustness to BMS in real-time applications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ionics\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"6851 - 6863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ionics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11581-025-06359-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ionics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11581-025-06359-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测电池容量对于增强电池管理系统(bms)、确保安全性和延长电池寿命至关重要。然而,由于电化学现象的影响,锂离子电池的性能会随着时间的推移而下降。可以通过数据驱动技术来估计电池容量和剩余使用寿命(RUL)。机器学习算法的有效性直接受到数据类型的影响。NASA和CALCE数据集用于验证ML算法的适用性。数据集根据充放电循环分为训练集和测试集。对预训练数据集进行时间序列测试,并对数据大小进行前向预测判断,预测RUL。在估计电池容量时可能存在过拟合或欠拟合问题。然而,这些问题可以通过适当调整时间序列模型中的超参数来解决,包括树的数量、树的最大深度和数据点的分割。由于数据可能是有噪声的或非线性的,在大多数情况下,RF通过构建多个决策树来防止过拟合或欠拟合,从而减少方差并提高准确性。与现有的数据驱动技术相比,即使在有限的数据上进行训练,RF也能在误差度量RMSE、MSE、MAPE和R2方面达到相当的预测精度。研究结果表明,射频是最佳选择,平均RMSE误差降至5.66E-16,并预测了锂离子电池在4次循环中的最大RUL误差。这些技术可以为实时应用程序中的BMS提供健壮性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for lithium-ion battery capacity prediction

Predicting battery capacity is essential for enhancing battery management systems (BMSs), ensuring safety, and extending battery life. However, lithium-ion battery faces the challenge of performance degradation over the period due to electrochemical phenomena. It can be addressed with data-driven techniques to estimate the battery capacity and remaining useful life (RUL). The machine learning (ML) algorithm efficacy directly impacted by the data types. NASA and CALCE datasets are used to validate the applicability of ML algorithms. The dataset are divided into training and testing sets based on charged-discharged cycles. Pretraining datasets are tested in time series with forward prediction judgment of the data size to predict RUL. There may be an overfitting or underfitting problems in estimating capacity of the battery. However, such problems can be addressed with proper tuning of hyperparameters in time series model with, number of trees, maximum depth of the tree and splitting the data points. As data may be noisy or nonlinear, in most cases, RF prevents overfitting or underfitting by building multiple decision trees which reduces the variance and increases accuracy. RF achieves comparable prediction accuracy, even when trained on limited data as compared to existing data-driven techniques in terms of error metrics RMSE, MSE, MAPE, and R2. The findings highlight RF as a preferred choice with an average RMSE error reduced to 5.66E-16 and predict the battery RUL maximum error in four cycles to lithium-ion battery. These techniques may provide robustness to BMS in real-time applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ionics
Ionics 化学-电化学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Ionics is publishing original results in the fields of science and technology of ionic motion. This includes theoretical, experimental and practical work on electrolytes, electrode, ionic/electronic interfaces, ionic transport aspects of corrosion, galvanic cells, e.g. for thermodynamic and kinetic studies, batteries, fuel cells, sensors and electrochromics. Fast solid ionic conductors are presently providing new opportunities in view of several advantages, in addition to conventional liquid electrolytes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信