{"title":"比较灵活的建模方法:变阈值模型与分位数回归","authors":"Niccolò Ducci, Leonardo Grilli, Marta Pittavino","doi":"10.1007/s11634-025-00635-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The varying-thresholds model (VTM) is a novel methodology proposed by Tutz ( Flexible predictive distributions from varying-thresholds modelling. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.13324, arXiv:2103.13324 2021) capable of estimating the whole conditional distribution of a response variable in a regression setting. It can be used for continuous, ordinal and count responses. In this study, conditional quantiles and prediction intervals estimated through VTM are compared with those of quantile regression. The comparison is based on a set of data-generating models to assess the performance of the two methodologies regarding the coverage and width of prediction intervals. The simulation study encompasses settings with several functional forms and types of errors. In addition, a discrete version of the continuous ranked probability score is proposed as a tool to choose the best link function for the binary models used in the fitting of VTM. In summary, the varying-thresholds model is a flexible methodology that can be broadly applied with light assumptions; it is advantageous over quantile regression when the conditional quantile function is misspecified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49270,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","volume":"19 classification and related methods”","pages":"493 - 514"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11634-025-00635-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing flexible modelling approaches: the varying-thresholds model versus quantile regression\",\"authors\":\"Niccolò Ducci, Leonardo Grilli, Marta Pittavino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11634-025-00635-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The varying-thresholds model (VTM) is a novel methodology proposed by Tutz ( Flexible predictive distributions from varying-thresholds modelling. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.13324, arXiv:2103.13324 2021) capable of estimating the whole conditional distribution of a response variable in a regression setting. It can be used for continuous, ordinal and count responses. In this study, conditional quantiles and prediction intervals estimated through VTM are compared with those of quantile regression. The comparison is based on a set of data-generating models to assess the performance of the two methodologies regarding the coverage and width of prediction intervals. The simulation study encompasses settings with several functional forms and types of errors. In addition, a discrete version of the continuous ranked probability score is proposed as a tool to choose the best link function for the binary models used in the fitting of VTM. In summary, the varying-thresholds model is a flexible methodology that can be broadly applied with light assumptions; it is advantageous over quantile regression when the conditional quantile function is misspecified.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification\",\"volume\":\"19 classification and related methods”\",\"pages\":\"493 - 514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11634-025-00635-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11634-025-00635-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Analysis and Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11634-025-00635-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing flexible modelling approaches: the varying-thresholds model versus quantile regression
The varying-thresholds model (VTM) is a novel methodology proposed by Tutz ( Flexible predictive distributions from varying-thresholds modelling. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2103.13324, arXiv:2103.13324 2021) capable of estimating the whole conditional distribution of a response variable in a regression setting. It can be used for continuous, ordinal and count responses. In this study, conditional quantiles and prediction intervals estimated through VTM are compared with those of quantile regression. The comparison is based on a set of data-generating models to assess the performance of the two methodologies regarding the coverage and width of prediction intervals. The simulation study encompasses settings with several functional forms and types of errors. In addition, a discrete version of the continuous ranked probability score is proposed as a tool to choose the best link function for the binary models used in the fitting of VTM. In summary, the varying-thresholds model is a flexible methodology that can be broadly applied with light assumptions; it is advantageous over quantile regression when the conditional quantile function is misspecified.
期刊介绍:
The international journal Advances in Data Analysis and Classification (ADAC) is designed as a forum for high standard publications on research and applications concerning the extraction of knowable aspects from many types of data. It publishes articles on such topics as structural, quantitative, or statistical approaches for the analysis of data; advances in classification, clustering, and pattern recognition methods; strategies for modeling complex data and mining large data sets; methods for the extraction of knowledge from data, and applications of advanced methods in specific domains of practice. Articles illustrate how new domain-specific knowledge can be made available from data by skillful use of data analysis methods. The journal also publishes survey papers that outline, and illuminate the basic ideas and techniques of special approaches.