{"title":"犯罪带来的好处比惩罚带来的伤害大吗?先前的非法收入,监禁,和回归创收犯罪","authors":"Alexander J. Vanhee","doi":"10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rational choice theories suggest people commit income-generating crime because it is seen as a quicker, easier, and/or more lucrative way of earning money. They also suggest incarceration can deter future instances of this behavior. However, individual-level variables could affect responses to sanctions. Prior illegal income may be one since it may act as a reference point for expectations of financial gains and success. The present study uses discrete-time analyses to investigate the effect of illegal income, incarceration, and incarceration length on self-reported criminal behavior across time. The sample consists of 7,347 person-periods derived from the Pathways to Desistance dataset. Higher illegal incomes are consistently linked to higher rates of income-generating crime. Meanwhile, the effect of incarceration is inconsistent, though the longest sentences are associated with lower rates of income-generating crime. There does not appear to be a substantial interaction between the two. Though present findings may be limited to specific sets of offenders; it seems prior success in criminal activity serves as a reference point for perceived benefits of future criminal behavior. Therefore, future researchers and CJ officials may to look into an individual’s illegal income as an additional factor when evaluating risk of recidivism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51509,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"50 4","pages":"664 - 685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Crime Pay More than Punishment Hurts? Prior Illegal Income, Incarceration, and Return to Income-Generating Crime\",\"authors\":\"Alexander J. Vanhee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Rational choice theories suggest people commit income-generating crime because it is seen as a quicker, easier, and/or more lucrative way of earning money. They also suggest incarceration can deter future instances of this behavior. However, individual-level variables could affect responses to sanctions. Prior illegal income may be one since it may act as a reference point for expectations of financial gains and success. The present study uses discrete-time analyses to investigate the effect of illegal income, incarceration, and incarceration length on self-reported criminal behavior across time. The sample consists of 7,347 person-periods derived from the Pathways to Desistance dataset. Higher illegal incomes are consistently linked to higher rates of income-generating crime. Meanwhile, the effect of incarceration is inconsistent, though the longest sentences are associated with lower rates of income-generating crime. There does not appear to be a substantial interaction between the two. Though present findings may be limited to specific sets of offenders; it seems prior success in criminal activity serves as a reference point for perceived benefits of future criminal behavior. Therefore, future researchers and CJ officials may to look into an individual’s illegal income as an additional factor when evaluating risk of recidivism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"664 - 685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Crime Pay More than Punishment Hurts? Prior Illegal Income, Incarceration, and Return to Income-Generating Crime
Rational choice theories suggest people commit income-generating crime because it is seen as a quicker, easier, and/or more lucrative way of earning money. They also suggest incarceration can deter future instances of this behavior. However, individual-level variables could affect responses to sanctions. Prior illegal income may be one since it may act as a reference point for expectations of financial gains and success. The present study uses discrete-time analyses to investigate the effect of illegal income, incarceration, and incarceration length on self-reported criminal behavior across time. The sample consists of 7,347 person-periods derived from the Pathways to Desistance dataset. Higher illegal incomes are consistently linked to higher rates of income-generating crime. Meanwhile, the effect of incarceration is inconsistent, though the longest sentences are associated with lower rates of income-generating crime. There does not appear to be a substantial interaction between the two. Though present findings may be limited to specific sets of offenders; it seems prior success in criminal activity serves as a reference point for perceived benefits of future criminal behavior. Therefore, future researchers and CJ officials may to look into an individual’s illegal income as an additional factor when evaluating risk of recidivism.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Criminal Justice, the official journal of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, is a peer reviewed publication; manuscripts go through a blind review process. The focus of the Journal is on a wide array of criminal justice topics and issues. Some of these concerns include items pertaining to the criminal justice process, the formal and informal interplay between system components, problems and solutions experienced by various segments, innovative practices, policy development and implementation, evaluative research, the players engaged in these enterprises, and a wide assortment of other related interests. The American Journal of Criminal Justice publishes original articles that utilize a broad range of methodologies and perspectives when examining crime, law, and criminal justice processing.