犯罪带来的好处比惩罚带来的伤害大吗?先前的非法收入,监禁,和回归创收犯罪

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Alexander J. Vanhee
{"title":"犯罪带来的好处比惩罚带来的伤害大吗?先前的非法收入,监禁,和回归创收犯罪","authors":"Alexander J. Vanhee","doi":"10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rational choice theories suggest people commit income-generating crime because it is seen as a quicker, easier, and/or more lucrative way of earning money. They also suggest incarceration can deter future instances of this behavior. However, individual-level variables could affect responses to sanctions. Prior illegal income may be one since it may act as a reference point for expectations of financial gains and success. The present study uses discrete-time analyses to investigate the effect of illegal income, incarceration, and incarceration length on self-reported criminal behavior across time. The sample consists of 7,347 person-periods derived from the Pathways to Desistance dataset. Higher illegal incomes are consistently linked to higher rates of income-generating crime. Meanwhile, the effect of incarceration is inconsistent, though the longest sentences are associated with lower rates of income-generating crime. There does not appear to be a substantial interaction between the two. Though present findings may be limited to specific sets of offenders; it seems prior success in criminal activity serves as a reference point for perceived benefits of future criminal behavior. Therefore, future researchers and CJ officials may to look into an individual’s illegal income as an additional factor when evaluating risk of recidivism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51509,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"50 4","pages":"664 - 685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Crime Pay More than Punishment Hurts? Prior Illegal Income, Incarceration, and Return to Income-Generating Crime\",\"authors\":\"Alexander J. Vanhee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Rational choice theories suggest people commit income-generating crime because it is seen as a quicker, easier, and/or more lucrative way of earning money. They also suggest incarceration can deter future instances of this behavior. However, individual-level variables could affect responses to sanctions. Prior illegal income may be one since it may act as a reference point for expectations of financial gains and success. The present study uses discrete-time analyses to investigate the effect of illegal income, incarceration, and incarceration length on self-reported criminal behavior across time. The sample consists of 7,347 person-periods derived from the Pathways to Desistance dataset. Higher illegal incomes are consistently linked to higher rates of income-generating crime. Meanwhile, the effect of incarceration is inconsistent, though the longest sentences are associated with lower rates of income-generating crime. There does not appear to be a substantial interaction between the two. Though present findings may be limited to specific sets of offenders; it seems prior success in criminal activity serves as a reference point for perceived benefits of future criminal behavior. Therefore, future researchers and CJ officials may to look into an individual’s illegal income as an additional factor when evaluating risk of recidivism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"50 4\",\"pages\":\"664 - 685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-025-09801-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理性选择理论认为,人们从事创收犯罪,是因为这被视为一种更快、更容易和/或更有利可图的赚钱方式。他们还表示,监禁可以阻止这种行为的未来发生。然而,个人层面的变量可能影响对制裁的反应。先前的非法收入可能是其中之一,因为它可以作为财务收益和成功预期的参考点。本研究采用离散时间分析来探讨非法收入、监禁和监禁时间对自我报告的犯罪行为的影响。该样本由7,347个人周期组成,这些人周期来自于“停止路径”数据集。较高的非法收入始终与较高的创收犯罪率有关。与此同时,监禁的效果是不一致的,尽管最长的刑期与较低的创收犯罪率有关。两者之间似乎没有实质性的相互作用。虽然目前的调查结果可能仅限于特定的罪犯群体;似乎先前犯罪活动的成功可以作为未来犯罪行为的感知利益的参考点。因此,未来的研究人员和CJ官员可能会将个人的非法收入作为评估再犯风险的额外因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Crime Pay More than Punishment Hurts? Prior Illegal Income, Incarceration, and Return to Income-Generating Crime

Rational choice theories suggest people commit income-generating crime because it is seen as a quicker, easier, and/or more lucrative way of earning money. They also suggest incarceration can deter future instances of this behavior. However, individual-level variables could affect responses to sanctions. Prior illegal income may be one since it may act as a reference point for expectations of financial gains and success. The present study uses discrete-time analyses to investigate the effect of illegal income, incarceration, and incarceration length on self-reported criminal behavior across time. The sample consists of 7,347 person-periods derived from the Pathways to Desistance dataset. Higher illegal incomes are consistently linked to higher rates of income-generating crime. Meanwhile, the effect of incarceration is inconsistent, though the longest sentences are associated with lower rates of income-generating crime. There does not appear to be a substantial interaction between the two. Though present findings may be limited to specific sets of offenders; it seems prior success in criminal activity serves as a reference point for perceived benefits of future criminal behavior. Therefore, future researchers and CJ officials may to look into an individual’s illegal income as an additional factor when evaluating risk of recidivism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Criminal Justice
American Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Criminal Justice, the official journal of the Southern Criminal Justice Association, is a peer reviewed publication; manuscripts go through a blind review process. The focus of the Journal is on a wide array of criminal justice topics and issues. Some of these concerns include items pertaining to the criminal justice process, the formal and informal interplay between system components, problems and solutions experienced by various segments, innovative practices, policy development and implementation, evaluative research, the players engaged in these enterprises, and a wide assortment of other related interests. The American Journal of Criminal Justice publishes original articles that utilize a broad range of methodologies and perspectives when examining crime, law, and criminal justice processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信