三轴压缩拉伸试验条件下固结软土不排水剪切特性

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Haibo Wang, Rongjun Zhang, Fengjuan Tao, Junjie Zheng
{"title":"三轴压缩拉伸试验条件下固结软土不排水剪切特性","authors":"Haibo Wang,&nbsp;Rongjun Zhang,&nbsp;Fengjuan Tao,&nbsp;Junjie Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02613-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In comparison with normally consolidated soft ground, consolidating soft ground often displays inferior engineering properties, which have not been thoroughly investigated yet. This study aims to investigate the undrained shear characteristics of consolidating soft soil under both compression and extension test conditions. A series of undrained triaxial compression and extension tests are conducted on reconstituted kaolin clay under different degrees of consolidation. The results indicate that the undrained stress–strain curves, the evolution of excess pore water pressure, and the undrained stress paths for both normally consolidated and consolidating soft soils exhibit a similar pattern. It is also found that consolidating soft soil also follows the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion, which can be expressed in terms of effective consolidation pressure and is considered to be independent of degree of consolidation. The primary difference between normally consolidated and consolidating soft soils lies in the initial tangent modulus, which decreases as the degree of consolidation decreases. Subsequently, a modified Duncan–Chang constitutive model is developed to accurately approximate the measured stress–strain curves of consolidating soft soil. Finally, the proposed model is validated by the experimental data, demonstrating its capability to effectively capture the influence of the consolidating state on shear characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 8","pages":"3987 - 4008"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undrained shear characteristics of consolidating soft soil under triaxial compression and extension test conditions\",\"authors\":\"Haibo Wang,&nbsp;Rongjun Zhang,&nbsp;Fengjuan Tao,&nbsp;Junjie Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02613-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In comparison with normally consolidated soft ground, consolidating soft ground often displays inferior engineering properties, which have not been thoroughly investigated yet. This study aims to investigate the undrained shear characteristics of consolidating soft soil under both compression and extension test conditions. A series of undrained triaxial compression and extension tests are conducted on reconstituted kaolin clay under different degrees of consolidation. The results indicate that the undrained stress–strain curves, the evolution of excess pore water pressure, and the undrained stress paths for both normally consolidated and consolidating soft soils exhibit a similar pattern. It is also found that consolidating soft soil also follows the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion, which can be expressed in terms of effective consolidation pressure and is considered to be independent of degree of consolidation. The primary difference between normally consolidated and consolidating soft soils lies in the initial tangent modulus, which decreases as the degree of consolidation decreases. Subsequently, a modified Duncan–Chang constitutive model is developed to accurately approximate the measured stress–strain curves of consolidating soft soil. Finally, the proposed model is validated by the experimental data, demonstrating its capability to effectively capture the influence of the consolidating state on shear characteristics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"3987 - 4008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02613-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02613-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与常规固结软土地基相比,固结软土地基往往表现出较差的工程性能,这方面的研究尚未深入。研究了固结软土在压缩和拉伸两种试验条件下的不排水剪切特性。对高岭土在不同固结程度下进行了一系列不排水三轴压缩和拉伸试验。结果表明:正常固结和固结软土的不排水应力-应变曲线、超孔隙水压力演化和不排水应力路径具有相似的规律;研究还发现,固结软土同样遵循Mohr-Coulomb破坏准则,该准则可以用有效固结压力表示,并且认为与固结程度无关。正常固结与固结软土的主要区别在于初始切线模量,其随固结程度的减小而减小。在此基础上,建立了一种修正的Duncan-Chang本构模型,能够较好地逼近固结软土的实测应力-应变曲线。最后,通过实验数据验证了该模型的有效性,证明了该模型能够有效地捕捉固结状态对剪切特性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Undrained shear characteristics of consolidating soft soil under triaxial compression and extension test conditions

Undrained shear characteristics of consolidating soft soil under triaxial compression and extension test conditions

In comparison with normally consolidated soft ground, consolidating soft ground often displays inferior engineering properties, which have not been thoroughly investigated yet. This study aims to investigate the undrained shear characteristics of consolidating soft soil under both compression and extension test conditions. A series of undrained triaxial compression and extension tests are conducted on reconstituted kaolin clay under different degrees of consolidation. The results indicate that the undrained stress–strain curves, the evolution of excess pore water pressure, and the undrained stress paths for both normally consolidated and consolidating soft soils exhibit a similar pattern. It is also found that consolidating soft soil also follows the Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion, which can be expressed in terms of effective consolidation pressure and is considered to be independent of degree of consolidation. The primary difference between normally consolidated and consolidating soft soils lies in the initial tangent modulus, which decreases as the degree of consolidation decreases. Subsequently, a modified Duncan–Chang constitutive model is developed to accurately approximate the measured stress–strain curves of consolidating soft soil. Finally, the proposed model is validated by the experimental data, demonstrating its capability to effectively capture the influence of the consolidating state on shear characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信