粘性弹性球:牛顿错了吗?

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Kevin Kendall
{"title":"粘性弹性球:牛顿错了吗?","authors":"Kevin Kendall","doi":"10.1007/s11249-025-02016-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Alan Roberts in 1966 was the first person to observe experimentally that elastic spheres made from optically smooth rubber could stick together, but he was not honoured for his unique contribution. The same might be said of Isaac Newton who wrote in his 1704 book Opticks that ‘Two polish’d marbles… by immediate contact stick together’. Newton’s postulate was clearly proved wrong in 1882 by Hertz who produced stress theory and observations to demonstrate there was no adhesion between polished glass or metal spheres. However, Kendall in 1970 produced evidence that iron hydroxide nanoparticles stuck strongly together and suggested that application of the energy criterion could explain this by rejecting the stress criterion of fracture. Ken Johnson had already solved the stress problem of sphere contact 12 years earlier in 1958 but suggested that adhesion was impossible because of the infinite tensile stress at the sphere contact edges. This paper describes how the 1970 collaboration between Johnson, Kendall and Roberts provided the correct solution published in 1971, proving Newton was right 266 years after his adhering spheres prediction.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":806,"journal":{"name":"Tribology Letters","volume":"73 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sticky Elastic Spheres: Was Newton Wrong?\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Kendall\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11249-025-02016-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Alan Roberts in 1966 was the first person to observe experimentally that elastic spheres made from optically smooth rubber could stick together, but he was not honoured for his unique contribution. The same might be said of Isaac Newton who wrote in his 1704 book Opticks that ‘Two polish’d marbles… by immediate contact stick together’. Newton’s postulate was clearly proved wrong in 1882 by Hertz who produced stress theory and observations to demonstrate there was no adhesion between polished glass or metal spheres. However, Kendall in 1970 produced evidence that iron hydroxide nanoparticles stuck strongly together and suggested that application of the energy criterion could explain this by rejecting the stress criterion of fracture. Ken Johnson had already solved the stress problem of sphere contact 12 years earlier in 1958 but suggested that adhesion was impossible because of the infinite tensile stress at the sphere contact edges. This paper describes how the 1970 collaboration between Johnson, Kendall and Roberts provided the correct solution published in 1971, proving Newton was right 266 years after his adhering spheres prediction.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribology Letters\",\"volume\":\"73 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-025-02016-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-025-02016-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1966年,艾伦·罗伯茨(Alan Roberts)是第一个通过实验观察到由光学光滑的橡胶制成的弹性球体可以粘在一起的人,但他并没有因为他独特的贡献而获得荣誉。艾萨克·牛顿在他1704年的著作《光学》中写道:“两颗抛光的大理石……通过直接接触粘在一起。”牛顿的假设在1882年被赫兹明确地证明是错误的,他提出了应力理论和观察,证明了抛光玻璃或金属球体之间没有附着力。然而,Kendall在1970年提出的证据表明,氢氧化铁纳米颗粒紧密地粘在一起,并提出应用能量标准可以通过拒绝破裂的应力标准来解释这一点。Ken Johnson早在12年前的1958年就已经解决了球体接触的应力问题,但他认为,由于球体接触边缘的拉伸应力是无限的,因此不可能实现粘附。这篇论文描述了1970年Johnson、Kendall和Roberts之间的合作如何提供了1971年发表的正确解,证明了牛顿在粘着球体预测266年后是正确的。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sticky Elastic Spheres: Was Newton Wrong?

Alan Roberts in 1966 was the first person to observe experimentally that elastic spheres made from optically smooth rubber could stick together, but he was not honoured for his unique contribution. The same might be said of Isaac Newton who wrote in his 1704 book Opticks that ‘Two polish’d marbles… by immediate contact stick together’. Newton’s postulate was clearly proved wrong in 1882 by Hertz who produced stress theory and observations to demonstrate there was no adhesion between polished glass or metal spheres. However, Kendall in 1970 produced evidence that iron hydroxide nanoparticles stuck strongly together and suggested that application of the energy criterion could explain this by rejecting the stress criterion of fracture. Ken Johnson had already solved the stress problem of sphere contact 12 years earlier in 1958 but suggested that adhesion was impossible because of the infinite tensile stress at the sphere contact edges. This paper describes how the 1970 collaboration between Johnson, Kendall and Roberts provided the correct solution published in 1971, proving Newton was right 266 years after his adhering spheres prediction.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tribology Letters
Tribology Letters 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
116
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Tribology Letters is devoted to the development of the science of tribology and its applications, particularly focusing on publishing high-quality papers at the forefront of tribological science and that address the fundamentals of friction, lubrication, wear, or adhesion. The journal facilitates communication and exchange of seminal ideas among thousands of practitioners who are engaged worldwide in the pursuit of tribology-based science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信