基于GIS的中国土点建设技术时空演变特征

IF 2 2区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Zhiqian Guo, Qiang Qi, Shuai Zhang, Wenwu Chen, Lei Yang, Yining Zhang
{"title":"基于GIS的中国土点建设技术时空演变特征","authors":"Zhiqian Guo,&nbsp;Qiang Qi,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Wenwu Chen,&nbsp;Lei Yang,&nbsp;Yining Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s12520-025-02247-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chinese earthen sites are notable for their abundance, historical depth, and cultural value, with construction techniques diversifying from Prehistory to the Qing Dynasty. However, existing research has yet to provide a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the spatial and chrono-cultural evolution of construction techniques at earthen sites. This study identifies eight key techniques, including cut left, rammed earth, adobe, wattle and daub, cob, stacked earth, grass-wrapped mud, and mixed soil-rock structure. their evolution was delineated into five phases: (I) Embryonic (Before 2070 B.C.), (II) Development (2070 B.C.-221 B.C.), (III) Formation (221 B.C.-618 A.D.), (IV) Application (618 A.D.-1206 A.D.), and (V) Transformation (1206 A.D.-1911 A.D.). Spatial analysis using ArcGIS Pro tools uncovered a \"concentration-diffusion\" pattern: rammed earth techniques radiated from the Central Plains, stacked earth clustered along the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers, and cut left prevailed in early civilization regions. Quantitatively, cut left dominated the Embryonic phase (41.5%), while rammed earth usage escalated from 78.5% to 91.5% across subsequent phases, marginalizing other methods. By the Transformation phase, only four techniques persisted at 47 sites, with masonry and wood displacing earthen structures. The spatiotemporal evolution reflects dual drivers: natural factors (climate, soil, topography) and societal dynamics (productivity advances, demand shifts), epitomizing the dialectical human- environment relationship. This synthesis of technical progression and environmental adaptation not only clarifies historical construction practices but also informs contemporary strategies for heritage preservation. The findings underscore how ecological constraints and human ingenuity jointly shaped architectural innovation, offering vital insights for heritage conservation and historical research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8214,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of spatial and chrono-cultural evolution of earthen sites construction technology in China based on GIS\",\"authors\":\"Zhiqian Guo,&nbsp;Qiang Qi,&nbsp;Shuai Zhang,&nbsp;Wenwu Chen,&nbsp;Lei Yang,&nbsp;Yining Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12520-025-02247-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Chinese earthen sites are notable for their abundance, historical depth, and cultural value, with construction techniques diversifying from Prehistory to the Qing Dynasty. However, existing research has yet to provide a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the spatial and chrono-cultural evolution of construction techniques at earthen sites. This study identifies eight key techniques, including cut left, rammed earth, adobe, wattle and daub, cob, stacked earth, grass-wrapped mud, and mixed soil-rock structure. their evolution was delineated into five phases: (I) Embryonic (Before 2070 B.C.), (II) Development (2070 B.C.-221 B.C.), (III) Formation (221 B.C.-618 A.D.), (IV) Application (618 A.D.-1206 A.D.), and (V) Transformation (1206 A.D.-1911 A.D.). Spatial analysis using ArcGIS Pro tools uncovered a \\\"concentration-diffusion\\\" pattern: rammed earth techniques radiated from the Central Plains, stacked earth clustered along the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers, and cut left prevailed in early civilization regions. Quantitatively, cut left dominated the Embryonic phase (41.5%), while rammed earth usage escalated from 78.5% to 91.5% across subsequent phases, marginalizing other methods. By the Transformation phase, only four techniques persisted at 47 sites, with masonry and wood displacing earthen structures. The spatiotemporal evolution reflects dual drivers: natural factors (climate, soil, topography) and societal dynamics (productivity advances, demand shifts), epitomizing the dialectical human- environment relationship. This synthesis of technical progression and environmental adaptation not only clarifies historical construction practices but also informs contemporary strategies for heritage preservation. The findings underscore how ecological constraints and human ingenuity jointly shaped architectural innovation, offering vital insights for heritage conservation and historical research.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02247-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-025-02247-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国的土建遗址以其丰富、历史深度和文化价值而闻名,其建筑技术从史前到清代多种多样。然而,现有的研究尚未对土建遗址的建筑技术的空间和时间文化演变提供全面的定量分析。本研究确定了8项关键技术,包括左切、夯土、土坯、木条和涂抹、玉米棒、堆土、草包泥和土石混合结构。它们的进化分为五个阶段:(I)胚胎(公元前2070年以前),(II)发育(公元前2070年-公元前221年),(III)形成(公元前221年-公元618年),(IV)应用(公元618年-公元1206年),(V)转化(公元1206年-1911年)。利用ArcGIS Pro工具进行空间分析,揭示了一种“集中-扩散”的格局:夯土技术以中原地区为辐射区域,叠土技术以黄河和长江为聚集区域,而左切则在早期文明区域盛行。在数量上,左切法在胚胎阶段占主导地位(41.5%),而夯土的使用在随后的阶段从78.5%上升到91.5%,将其他方法边缘化。在转型阶段,只有4种技术在47个地点保留下来,砖石和木材取代了土结构。时空演变反映了双重驱动因素:自然因素(气候、土壤、地形)和社会动态因素(生产力进步、需求变化),集中体现了人与环境的辩证关系。这种技术进步和环境适应的综合不仅澄清了历史建筑实践,而且为当代遗产保护策略提供了信息。研究结果强调了生态约束和人类智慧如何共同塑造了建筑创新,为遗产保护和历史研究提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of spatial and chrono-cultural evolution of earthen sites construction technology in China based on GIS

Chinese earthen sites are notable for their abundance, historical depth, and cultural value, with construction techniques diversifying from Prehistory to the Qing Dynasty. However, existing research has yet to provide a comprehensive quantitative analysis of the spatial and chrono-cultural evolution of construction techniques at earthen sites. This study identifies eight key techniques, including cut left, rammed earth, adobe, wattle and daub, cob, stacked earth, grass-wrapped mud, and mixed soil-rock structure. their evolution was delineated into five phases: (I) Embryonic (Before 2070 B.C.), (II) Development (2070 B.C.-221 B.C.), (III) Formation (221 B.C.-618 A.D.), (IV) Application (618 A.D.-1206 A.D.), and (V) Transformation (1206 A.D.-1911 A.D.). Spatial analysis using ArcGIS Pro tools uncovered a "concentration-diffusion" pattern: rammed earth techniques radiated from the Central Plains, stacked earth clustered along the Yellow and Yangtze Rivers, and cut left prevailed in early civilization regions. Quantitatively, cut left dominated the Embryonic phase (41.5%), while rammed earth usage escalated from 78.5% to 91.5% across subsequent phases, marginalizing other methods. By the Transformation phase, only four techniques persisted at 47 sites, with masonry and wood displacing earthen structures. The spatiotemporal evolution reflects dual drivers: natural factors (climate, soil, topography) and societal dynamics (productivity advances, demand shifts), epitomizing the dialectical human- environment relationship. This synthesis of technical progression and environmental adaptation not only clarifies historical construction practices but also informs contemporary strategies for heritage preservation. The findings underscore how ecological constraints and human ingenuity jointly shaped architectural innovation, offering vital insights for heritage conservation and historical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
18.20%
发文量
199
期刊介绍: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences covers the full spectrum of natural scientific methods with an emphasis on the archaeological contexts and the questions being studied. It bridges the gap between archaeologists and natural scientists providing a forum to encourage the continued integration of scientific methodologies in archaeological research. Coverage in the journal includes: archaeology, geology/geophysical prospection, geoarchaeology, geochronology, palaeoanthropology, archaeozoology and archaeobotany, genetics and other biomolecules, material analysis and conservation science. The journal is endorsed by the German Society of Natural Scientific Archaeology and Archaeometry (GNAA), the Hellenic Society for Archaeometry (HSC), the Association of Italian Archaeometrists (AIAr) and the Society of Archaeological Sciences (SAS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信