Sarah E. M. Milne, Suzette Timmerman, Kristina Kublik, Anetta Banas, Thomas Stachel, George Read, D. Graham Pearson
{"title":"锆石钻石有多老?萨斯克克拉通根部中元古代金刚石的形成","authors":"Sarah E. M. Milne, Suzette Timmerman, Kristina Kublik, Anetta Banas, Thomas Stachel, George Read, D. Graham Pearson","doi":"10.1007/s00710-025-00946-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Diamondiferous kimberlites of the Cretaceous Fort á la Corne (FalC) field erupted through the Sask craton. The Palaeoproterozoic age of its lithospheric mantle root provides an unconventional setting for a major diamond deposit. We report the first diamond formation ages for the Sask craton, using diamonds from the Star kimberlite. Sm-Nd dating of garnet and clinopyroxene inclusions of lherzolitic paragenesis yields an isochron of 1262 ± 37 Ma and an ɛNd<sub><i>i</i></sub> value of -10.8 ± 1.2. The average initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr at 1262 Ma is 0.70459 ± 0.00001. A single diamond-forming event is supported by the overall similar inclusion compositions (major and trace elements), host diamond carbon isotopic compositions, N-abundance and low N-aggregation states. A Monte Carlo mixing model to generate the initial Sr-Nd isotope compositions of the FalC diamond inclusion suite supports a scenario in which the diamond substrates acquired their geochemical characteristics through earlier infiltration of lithospheric lherzolite by variable amounts (8 to 10 wt%) of an incompatible element-enriched melt with isotopic characteristics resembling cratonic lamproite. We propose a model in which asthenosphere-derived melts produced during rifting or the Trans Hudson Orogeny formed a metasome in the deep Sask craton lithospheric root. This metasome evolved isotopically for ~ 0.6 to 0.8 Gyr, before being remobilized and refertilizing lherzolitic substrates, resulting also in diamond formation. Diamond formation was associated with minimal thermal disturbance, during mobilization of fluids triggered by either far-field effects from the Mackenzie dyke swarm (~ 1270 Ma) or the Grenville orogeny (1.3–0.9 Ga).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18547,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogy and Petrology","volume":"119 3","pages":"365 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How old are lherzolitic diamonds? Mesoproterozoic diamond formation in the root of the Sask craton\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E. M. Milne, Suzette Timmerman, Kristina Kublik, Anetta Banas, Thomas Stachel, George Read, D. Graham Pearson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00710-025-00946-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Diamondiferous kimberlites of the Cretaceous Fort á la Corne (FalC) field erupted through the Sask craton. The Palaeoproterozoic age of its lithospheric mantle root provides an unconventional setting for a major diamond deposit. We report the first diamond formation ages for the Sask craton, using diamonds from the Star kimberlite. Sm-Nd dating of garnet and clinopyroxene inclusions of lherzolitic paragenesis yields an isochron of 1262 ± 37 Ma and an ɛNd<sub><i>i</i></sub> value of -10.8 ± 1.2. The average initial <sup>87</sup>Sr/<sup>86</sup>Sr at 1262 Ma is 0.70459 ± 0.00001. A single diamond-forming event is supported by the overall similar inclusion compositions (major and trace elements), host diamond carbon isotopic compositions, N-abundance and low N-aggregation states. A Monte Carlo mixing model to generate the initial Sr-Nd isotope compositions of the FalC diamond inclusion suite supports a scenario in which the diamond substrates acquired their geochemical characteristics through earlier infiltration of lithospheric lherzolite by variable amounts (8 to 10 wt%) of an incompatible element-enriched melt with isotopic characteristics resembling cratonic lamproite. We propose a model in which asthenosphere-derived melts produced during rifting or the Trans Hudson Orogeny formed a metasome in the deep Sask craton lithospheric root. This metasome evolved isotopically for ~ 0.6 to 0.8 Gyr, before being remobilized and refertilizing lherzolitic substrates, resulting also in diamond formation. Diamond formation was associated with minimal thermal disturbance, during mobilization of fluids triggered by either far-field effects from the Mackenzie dyke swarm (~ 1270 Ma) or the Grenville orogeny (1.3–0.9 Ga).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mineralogy and Petrology\",\"volume\":\"119 3\",\"pages\":\"365 - 377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mineralogy and Petrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00710-025-00946-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogy and Petrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00710-025-00946-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
How old are lherzolitic diamonds? Mesoproterozoic diamond formation in the root of the Sask craton
Diamondiferous kimberlites of the Cretaceous Fort á la Corne (FalC) field erupted through the Sask craton. The Palaeoproterozoic age of its lithospheric mantle root provides an unconventional setting for a major diamond deposit. We report the first diamond formation ages for the Sask craton, using diamonds from the Star kimberlite. Sm-Nd dating of garnet and clinopyroxene inclusions of lherzolitic paragenesis yields an isochron of 1262 ± 37 Ma and an ɛNdi value of -10.8 ± 1.2. The average initial 87Sr/86Sr at 1262 Ma is 0.70459 ± 0.00001. A single diamond-forming event is supported by the overall similar inclusion compositions (major and trace elements), host diamond carbon isotopic compositions, N-abundance and low N-aggregation states. A Monte Carlo mixing model to generate the initial Sr-Nd isotope compositions of the FalC diamond inclusion suite supports a scenario in which the diamond substrates acquired their geochemical characteristics through earlier infiltration of lithospheric lherzolite by variable amounts (8 to 10 wt%) of an incompatible element-enriched melt with isotopic characteristics resembling cratonic lamproite. We propose a model in which asthenosphere-derived melts produced during rifting or the Trans Hudson Orogeny formed a metasome in the deep Sask craton lithospheric root. This metasome evolved isotopically for ~ 0.6 to 0.8 Gyr, before being remobilized and refertilizing lherzolitic substrates, resulting also in diamond formation. Diamond formation was associated with minimal thermal disturbance, during mobilization of fluids triggered by either far-field effects from the Mackenzie dyke swarm (~ 1270 Ma) or the Grenville orogeny (1.3–0.9 Ga).
期刊介绍:
Mineralogy and Petrology welcomes manuscripts from the classical fields of mineralogy, igneous and metamorphic petrology, geochemistry, crystallography, as well as their applications in academic experimentation and research, materials science and engineering, for technology, industry, environment, or society. The journal strongly promotes cross-fertilization among Earth-scientific and applied materials-oriented disciplines. Purely descriptive manuscripts on regional topics will not be considered.
Mineralogy and Petrology was founded in 1872 by Gustav Tschermak as "Mineralogische und Petrographische Mittheilungen". It is one of Europe''s oldest geoscience journals. Former editors include outstanding names such as Gustav Tschermak, Friedrich Becke, Felix Machatschki, Josef Zemann, and Eugen F. Stumpfl.