不可能知道断言的悖论

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Rafał Palczewski, Patryk Popławski
{"title":"不可能知道断言的悖论","authors":"Rafał Palczewski,&nbsp;Patryk Popławski","doi":"10.1007/s12136-024-00613-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We show that taking together the principle <i>‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’</i> (OIC) and <i>The Knowledge Norm of Assertion</i> (KNA) leads to a contradiction as long as we assume that there are situations in which we ought to assert what we cannot know. We call this <i>The Paradox of Impossible to Know Assertion</i> (PIKA) and argue that this is a genuine problem. At the end, we point out a generalization of PIKA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":"40 3","pages":"455 - 472"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-024-00613-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Paradox of Impossible to Know Assertion\",\"authors\":\"Rafał Palczewski,&nbsp;Patryk Popławski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12136-024-00613-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We show that taking together the principle <i>‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’</i> (OIC) and <i>The Knowledge Norm of Assertion</i> (KNA) leads to a contradiction as long as we assume that there are situations in which we ought to assert what we cannot know. We call this <i>The Paradox of Impossible to Know Assertion</i> (PIKA) and argue that this is a genuine problem. At the end, we point out a generalization of PIKA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"455 - 472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12136-024-00613-3.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-024-00613-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-024-00613-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们表明,只要我们假设存在我们应该断言我们不知道的东西的情况,那么将“应该”暗示“可以”原则(OIC)和断言的知识规范(KNA)结合在一起就会导致矛盾。我们称之为“不可能知道的悖论”(PIKA),并认为这是一个真正的问题。最后,我们指出了PIKA的推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Paradox of Impossible to Know Assertion

We show that taking together the principle ‘Ought’ Implies ‘Can’ (OIC) and The Knowledge Norm of Assertion (KNA) leads to a contradiction as long as we assume that there are situations in which we ought to assert what we cannot know. We call this The Paradox of Impossible to Know Assertion (PIKA) and argue that this is a genuine problem. At the end, we point out a generalization of PIKA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Acta Analytica is an international journal for philosophy in the analytical tradition covering a variety of philosophical topics including philosophical logic, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science and philosophy of mind. Special attention is devoted to cognitive science. The journal aims to promote a rigorous, argument-based approach in philosophy. Acta Analytica is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, with authors from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信