{"title":"概念表示的计算方法:旋风之旅","authors":"Mattia Fumagalli, Riccardo Baratella, Marcello Frixione, Daniele Porello","doi":"10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The modelling of <i>concepts</i>, besides involving disciplines like <i>philosophy of mind</i> and <i>psychology</i>, is a fundamental and lively research problem in several <i>artificial intelligence (AI)</i> areas, such as <i>knowledge representation</i>, <i>machine learning</i>, and natural <i>language processing</i>. In this scenario, the most prominent proposed solutions adopt different (often incompatible) assumptions about the nature of such a notion. Each of these solutions has been developed to capture some specific features of concepts and support some specific (artificial) cognitive operations. This paper critically reviews the most notable computational approaches to the representation of concepts. The main goals are <i>(i)</i> to provide a shared terminology for the desiderata of concepts and their computational representation; <i>(ii)</i> to classify and assess the heterogeneous computational approaches according to the provided terminology; <i>(iii)</i> to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with theories of concepts with an introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects, and <i>(iv)</i> to offer philosophers, and potentially AI practitioners, a well-informed guide for selecting among various (and possibly competing) computational representations of concepts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":"40 3","pages":"489 - 520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Approaches to Concepts Representation: A Whirlwind Tour\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Fumagalli, Riccardo Baratella, Marcello Frixione, Daniele Porello\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The modelling of <i>concepts</i>, besides involving disciplines like <i>philosophy of mind</i> and <i>psychology</i>, is a fundamental and lively research problem in several <i>artificial intelligence (AI)</i> areas, such as <i>knowledge representation</i>, <i>machine learning</i>, and natural <i>language processing</i>. In this scenario, the most prominent proposed solutions adopt different (often incompatible) assumptions about the nature of such a notion. Each of these solutions has been developed to capture some specific features of concepts and support some specific (artificial) cognitive operations. This paper critically reviews the most notable computational approaches to the representation of concepts. The main goals are <i>(i)</i> to provide a shared terminology for the desiderata of concepts and their computational representation; <i>(ii)</i> to classify and assess the heterogeneous computational approaches according to the provided terminology; <i>(iii)</i> to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with theories of concepts with an introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects, and <i>(iv)</i> to offer philosophers, and potentially AI practitioners, a well-informed guide for selecting among various (and possibly competing) computational representations of concepts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"489 - 520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computational Approaches to Concepts Representation: A Whirlwind Tour
The modelling of concepts, besides involving disciplines like philosophy of mind and psychology, is a fundamental and lively research problem in several artificial intelligence (AI) areas, such as knowledge representation, machine learning, and natural language processing. In this scenario, the most prominent proposed solutions adopt different (often incompatible) assumptions about the nature of such a notion. Each of these solutions has been developed to capture some specific features of concepts and support some specific (artificial) cognitive operations. This paper critically reviews the most notable computational approaches to the representation of concepts. The main goals are (i) to provide a shared terminology for the desiderata of concepts and their computational representation; (ii) to classify and assess the heterogeneous computational approaches according to the provided terminology; (iii) to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with theories of concepts with an introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects, and (iv) to offer philosophers, and potentially AI practitioners, a well-informed guide for selecting among various (and possibly competing) computational representations of concepts.
期刊介绍:
Acta Analytica is an international journal for philosophy in the analytical tradition covering a variety of philosophical topics including philosophical logic, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science and philosophy of mind. Special attention is devoted to cognitive science. The journal aims to promote a rigorous, argument-based approach in philosophy. Acta Analytica is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, with authors from all over the world.