概念表示的计算方法:旋风之旅

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Mattia Fumagalli, Riccardo Baratella, Marcello Frixione, Daniele Porello
{"title":"概念表示的计算方法:旋风之旅","authors":"Mattia Fumagalli,&nbsp;Riccardo Baratella,&nbsp;Marcello Frixione,&nbsp;Daniele Porello","doi":"10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The modelling of <i>concepts</i>, besides involving disciplines like <i>philosophy of mind</i> and <i>psychology</i>, is a fundamental and lively research problem in several <i>artificial intelligence (AI)</i> areas, such as <i>knowledge representation</i>, <i>machine learning</i>, and natural <i>language processing</i>. In this scenario, the most prominent proposed solutions adopt different (often incompatible) assumptions about the nature of such a notion. Each of these solutions has been developed to capture some specific features of concepts and support some specific (artificial) cognitive operations. This paper critically reviews the most notable computational approaches to the representation of concepts. The main goals are <i>(i)</i> to provide a shared terminology for the desiderata of concepts and their computational representation; <i>(ii)</i> to classify and assess the heterogeneous computational approaches according to the provided terminology; <i>(iii)</i> to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with theories of concepts with an introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects, and <i>(iv)</i> to offer philosophers, and potentially AI practitioners, a well-informed guide for selecting among various (and possibly competing) computational representations of concepts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44390,"journal":{"name":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","volume":"40 3","pages":"489 - 520"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Approaches to Concepts Representation: A Whirlwind Tour\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Fumagalli,&nbsp;Riccardo Baratella,&nbsp;Marcello Frixione,&nbsp;Daniele Porello\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The modelling of <i>concepts</i>, besides involving disciplines like <i>philosophy of mind</i> and <i>psychology</i>, is a fundamental and lively research problem in several <i>artificial intelligence (AI)</i> areas, such as <i>knowledge representation</i>, <i>machine learning</i>, and natural <i>language processing</i>. In this scenario, the most prominent proposed solutions adopt different (often incompatible) assumptions about the nature of such a notion. Each of these solutions has been developed to capture some specific features of concepts and support some specific (artificial) cognitive operations. This paper critically reviews the most notable computational approaches to the representation of concepts. The main goals are <i>(i)</i> to provide a shared terminology for the desiderata of concepts and their computational representation; <i>(ii)</i> to classify and assess the heterogeneous computational approaches according to the provided terminology; <i>(iii)</i> to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with theories of concepts with an introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects, and <i>(iv)</i> to offer philosophers, and potentially AI practitioners, a well-informed guide for selecting among various (and possibly competing) computational representations of concepts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"volume\":\"40 3\",\"pages\":\"489 - 520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Analytica-International Periodical for Philosophy in the Analytical Tradition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12136-024-00619-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

概念建模除了涉及心灵哲学和心理学等学科外,还是几个人工智能(AI)领域(如知识表示、机器学习和自然语言处理)的一个基础和活跃的研究问题。在这种情况下,提出的最突出的解决方案采用了关于这种概念的性质的不同(通常是不相容的)假设。这些解决方案中的每一个都是为了捕捉概念的某些特定特征并支持某些特定的(人工的)认知操作而开发的。本文批判性地回顾了最著名的概念表示的计算方法。主要目标是(i)为概念及其计算表示提供共享术语;(ii)根据所提供的术语对异构计算方法进行分类和评估;(iii)为可能不太熟悉概念理论的读者提供本研究的主要主题介绍和不同研究项目的指针,以及(iv)为哲学家和潜在的人工智能从业者提供在各种(可能相互竞争的)概念计算表示中进行选择的信息灵通指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Computational Approaches to Concepts Representation: A Whirlwind Tour

Computational Approaches to Concepts Representation: A Whirlwind Tour

The modelling of concepts, besides involving disciplines like philosophy of mind and psychology, is a fundamental and lively research problem in several artificial intelligence (AI) areas, such as knowledge representation, machine learning, and natural language processing. In this scenario, the most prominent proposed solutions adopt different (often incompatible) assumptions about the nature of such a notion. Each of these solutions has been developed to capture some specific features of concepts and support some specific (artificial) cognitive operations. This paper critically reviews the most notable computational approaches to the representation of concepts. The main goals are (i) to provide a shared terminology for the desiderata of concepts and their computational representation; (ii) to classify and assess the heterogeneous computational approaches according to the provided terminology; (iii) to provide a reader who may not be very familiar with theories of concepts with an introduction to major themes in this research and with pointers to different research projects, and (iv) to offer philosophers, and potentially AI practitioners, a well-informed guide for selecting among various (and possibly competing) computational representations of concepts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Acta Analytica is an international journal for philosophy in the analytical tradition covering a variety of philosophical topics including philosophical logic, metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of science and philosophy of mind. Special attention is devoted to cognitive science. The journal aims to promote a rigorous, argument-based approach in philosophy. Acta Analytica is a peer reviewed journal, published quarterly, with authors from all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信