反冲管道起裂时包层缺陷失效模式分析

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Sige Peng, Chufei Li, John D. Rice, Wu Zhang, Guanyong Luo, Hong Cao, Hong Pan
{"title":"反冲管道起裂时包层缺陷失效模式分析","authors":"Sige Peng,&nbsp;Chufei Li,&nbsp;John D. Rice,&nbsp;Wu Zhang,&nbsp;Guanyong Luo,&nbsp;Hong Cao,&nbsp;Hong Pan","doi":"10.1007/s11440-025-02610-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Backward erosion piping (BEP), a critical mechanism of internal erosion in levees and dams, initiates at downstream blanket defects where hydraulic pressures exceed the resistance of cohesive soil layers. While prior studies focused on BEP with preset exits, this research investigates failure patterns under varying defect geometries and soil properties through laboratory experiments and a simplified analytical model. The model integrates defect dimensions (length, width, thickness), soil cohesion, and internal friction angle to predict three failure modes: shear, bending, and bending-shear. The model was verified by laboratory results and revealed the following: (1) the increase in soil cohesion and internal friction angle enhanced seepage resistance, but this effect diminished for defects with high length-to-thickness ratios (<i>a</i>/<i>t</i>) or width-to-thickness ratios (<i>b</i>/<i>t</i>); (2) Larger <i>a</i>/<i>t</i> or <i>b</i>/<i>t</i> ratios reduced the shear strength coefficient (<i>η</i>) exponentially, shifting failure dominance from shear to bending; and (3) the combinations of the ratio of the pressure head at the near-upstream edge and far-upstream edge to the head of the reference point (<i>ξ</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>ξ</i><sub>2</sub>) had minimal influence on failure thresholds, but transient flow conditions (e.g., sudden head surges) could bypass gradual bending deformation, triggering abrupt shear failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49308,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geotechnica","volume":"20 8","pages":"3951 - 3972"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyses for failure patterns of blanket defects on initiation of backward erosion piping\",\"authors\":\"Sige Peng,&nbsp;Chufei Li,&nbsp;John D. Rice,&nbsp;Wu Zhang,&nbsp;Guanyong Luo,&nbsp;Hong Cao,&nbsp;Hong Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11440-025-02610-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Backward erosion piping (BEP), a critical mechanism of internal erosion in levees and dams, initiates at downstream blanket defects where hydraulic pressures exceed the resistance of cohesive soil layers. While prior studies focused on BEP with preset exits, this research investigates failure patterns under varying defect geometries and soil properties through laboratory experiments and a simplified analytical model. The model integrates defect dimensions (length, width, thickness), soil cohesion, and internal friction angle to predict three failure modes: shear, bending, and bending-shear. The model was verified by laboratory results and revealed the following: (1) the increase in soil cohesion and internal friction angle enhanced seepage resistance, but this effect diminished for defects with high length-to-thickness ratios (<i>a</i>/<i>t</i>) or width-to-thickness ratios (<i>b</i>/<i>t</i>); (2) Larger <i>a</i>/<i>t</i> or <i>b</i>/<i>t</i> ratios reduced the shear strength coefficient (<i>η</i>) exponentially, shifting failure dominance from shear to bending; and (3) the combinations of the ratio of the pressure head at the near-upstream edge and far-upstream edge to the head of the reference point (<i>ξ</i><sub>1</sub> and <i>ξ</i><sub>2</sub>) had minimal influence on failure thresholds, but transient flow conditions (e.g., sudden head surges) could bypass gradual bending deformation, triggering abrupt shear failure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"3951 - 3972\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02610-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11440-025-02610-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反向侵蚀管道(BEP)是堤坝内部侵蚀的一种重要机制,它起源于水力压力超过粘性土层阻力的下游毯状缺陷。先前的研究主要集中在具有预设出口的BEP上,而本研究通过实验室实验和简化的分析模型研究了不同缺陷几何形状和土壤性质下的破坏模式。该模型综合缺陷尺寸(长度、宽度、厚度)、土黏聚力和内摩擦角,预测剪切、弯曲和弯剪三种破坏模式。结果表明:(1)土体黏聚力和内摩擦角的增大会增强土体的抗渗能力,但对于高长厚比(a/t)和高宽厚比(b/t)的缺陷,这种影响会减弱;(2)较大的a/t或b/t比使抗剪强度系数(η)呈指数型降低,破坏主体由剪切为主向弯曲为主转变;(3)近上游边缘和远上游边缘压头与参考点水头(ξ1和ξ2)的比例组合对破坏阈值的影响最小,但瞬态流动条件(如突然水头浪涌)可以绕过逐渐弯曲变形,触发突变剪切破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analyses for failure patterns of blanket defects on initiation of backward erosion piping

Analyses for failure patterns of blanket defects on initiation of backward erosion piping

Backward erosion piping (BEP), a critical mechanism of internal erosion in levees and dams, initiates at downstream blanket defects where hydraulic pressures exceed the resistance of cohesive soil layers. While prior studies focused on BEP with preset exits, this research investigates failure patterns under varying defect geometries and soil properties through laboratory experiments and a simplified analytical model. The model integrates defect dimensions (length, width, thickness), soil cohesion, and internal friction angle to predict three failure modes: shear, bending, and bending-shear. The model was verified by laboratory results and revealed the following: (1) the increase in soil cohesion and internal friction angle enhanced seepage resistance, but this effect diminished for defects with high length-to-thickness ratios (a/t) or width-to-thickness ratios (b/t); (2) Larger a/t or b/t ratios reduced the shear strength coefficient (η) exponentially, shifting failure dominance from shear to bending; and (3) the combinations of the ratio of the pressure head at the near-upstream edge and far-upstream edge to the head of the reference point (ξ1 and ξ2) had minimal influence on failure thresholds, but transient flow conditions (e.g., sudden head surges) could bypass gradual bending deformation, triggering abrupt shear failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geotechnica
Acta Geotechnica ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
17.50%
发文量
297
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acta Geotechnica is an international journal devoted to the publication and dissemination of basic and applied research in geoengineering – an interdisciplinary field dealing with geomaterials such as soils and rocks. Coverage emphasizes the interplay between geomechanical models and their engineering applications. The journal presents original research papers on fundamental concepts in geomechanics and their novel applications in geoengineering based on experimental, analytical and/or numerical approaches. The main purpose of the journal is to foster understanding of the fundamental mechanisms behind the phenomena and processes in geomaterials, from kilometer-scale problems as they occur in geoscience, and down to the nano-scale, with their potential impact on geoengineering. The journal strives to report and archive progress in the field in a timely manner, presenting research papers, review articles, short notes and letters to the editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信