氢能单缸重型发动机不同混合气形成策略的快速no排放分析

Manuel Bucherer, Hans Felix Schmid, Theodor Lanzer, Heiko Kubach, Thomas Koch
{"title":"氢能单缸重型发动机不同混合气形成策略的快速no排放分析","authors":"Manuel Bucherer,&nbsp;Hans Felix Schmid,&nbsp;Theodor Lanzer,&nbsp;Heiko Kubach,&nbsp;Thomas Koch","doi":"10.1007/s41104-025-00155-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates nitrogen oxide emissions (NO<span>\\(_x\\)</span>) in a heavy-duty hydrogen engine by comparing Port Fuel Injection (PFI) with two Direct Injection (DI) configurations under various load conditions. A fast chemiluminescence detector (CLD) enables cycle-resolved nitrogen monoxide emission (NO) measurements, providing detailed insights into the emission characteristics of each injection strategy. The findings reveal that the PFI configuration consistently results in the lowest NO<span>\\(_x\\)</span> emissions due to superior air–fuel mixture homogenization. Additionally, it exhibits minimal cycle-to-cycle variations in both pressure traces and NO emissions. The indicated efficiency of the PFI setup is also higher compared to DI, likely due to the higher charge air pressures required to maintain a constant air–fuel ratio and reduced wall-heat losses. Conversely, the DI configurations, especially the 4-hole cap design, produce significantly higher NO<span>\\(_x\\)</span> emissions and show considerable variability between cycles. A strong exponential correlation between NO emissions and peak cylinder pressure (p<span>\\(_{max}\\)</span>), which directly influences in-cylinder temperature, is observed across all configurations. The DI setups exhibit faster combustion, driven by increased turbulent kinetic energy from the hydrogen jet, leading to higher in-cylinder pressures and temperatures. This rapid combustion process complicates emission control by increasing NO<span>\\(_x\\)</span> formation. Despite similar combustion behavior and efficiency between the 1-hole and 4-hole DI setups, the latter generates much higher NO<span>\\(_x\\)</span> emissions, highlighting the crucial role of mixture homogenization. Cycle-based analysis further indicates that DI configurations, particularly the 4-hole cap design, experience single-cycle NO emissions spikes, making consistent emission control more challenging. While PFI presents clear advantages in emission reduction and efficiency, DI setups provide comparable power output with lower charge air pressure requirements. However, challenges in mixture formation must be addressed to optimize DI strategies for hydrogen engines. Overall, the study underscores the significance of optimizing mixture formation to mitigate NO<span>\\(_x\\)</span> emissions in hydrogen engines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100150,"journal":{"name":"Automotive and Engine Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41104-025-00155-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast-NO emission analysis of different mixture formation strategies in a hydrogen single-cylinder heavy-duty engine\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Bucherer,&nbsp;Hans Felix Schmid,&nbsp;Theodor Lanzer,&nbsp;Heiko Kubach,&nbsp;Thomas Koch\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s41104-025-00155-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study investigates nitrogen oxide emissions (NO<span>\\\\(_x\\\\)</span>) in a heavy-duty hydrogen engine by comparing Port Fuel Injection (PFI) with two Direct Injection (DI) configurations under various load conditions. A fast chemiluminescence detector (CLD) enables cycle-resolved nitrogen monoxide emission (NO) measurements, providing detailed insights into the emission characteristics of each injection strategy. The findings reveal that the PFI configuration consistently results in the lowest NO<span>\\\\(_x\\\\)</span> emissions due to superior air–fuel mixture homogenization. Additionally, it exhibits minimal cycle-to-cycle variations in both pressure traces and NO emissions. The indicated efficiency of the PFI setup is also higher compared to DI, likely due to the higher charge air pressures required to maintain a constant air–fuel ratio and reduced wall-heat losses. Conversely, the DI configurations, especially the 4-hole cap design, produce significantly higher NO<span>\\\\(_x\\\\)</span> emissions and show considerable variability between cycles. A strong exponential correlation between NO emissions and peak cylinder pressure (p<span>\\\\(_{max}\\\\)</span>), which directly influences in-cylinder temperature, is observed across all configurations. The DI setups exhibit faster combustion, driven by increased turbulent kinetic energy from the hydrogen jet, leading to higher in-cylinder pressures and temperatures. This rapid combustion process complicates emission control by increasing NO<span>\\\\(_x\\\\)</span> formation. Despite similar combustion behavior and efficiency between the 1-hole and 4-hole DI setups, the latter generates much higher NO<span>\\\\(_x\\\\)</span> emissions, highlighting the crucial role of mixture homogenization. Cycle-based analysis further indicates that DI configurations, particularly the 4-hole cap design, experience single-cycle NO emissions spikes, making consistent emission control more challenging. While PFI presents clear advantages in emission reduction and efficiency, DI setups provide comparable power output with lower charge air pressure requirements. However, challenges in mixture formation must be addressed to optimize DI strategies for hydrogen engines. Overall, the study underscores the significance of optimizing mixture formation to mitigate NO<span>\\\\(_x\\\\)</span> emissions in hydrogen engines.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41104-025-00155-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Automotive and Engine Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-025-00155-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automotive and Engine Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41104-025-00155-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过比较港口燃油喷射(PFI)和两种直接喷射(DI)配置在不同负载条件下对重型氢发动机的氮氧化物排放(NO \(_x\))进行了研究。快速化学发光检测器(CLD)可实现循环分辨的一氧化氮排放(NO)测量,提供对每种注入策略的排放特性的详细见解。研究结果表明,由于优越的空气-燃料混合物均质化,PFI配置始终导致最低的NO \(_x\)排放。此外,它在压力轨迹和NO排放方面表现出最小的循环变化。PFI装置的指示效率也比DI高,可能是由于维持恒定的空燃比和减少壁面热损失所需的更高的增压空气压力。相反,直喷发动机配置,尤其是4孔阀盖设计,会产生更高的NO \(_x\)排放,并且在不同循环之间表现出相当大的变化。NO排放与缸内峰值压力(p \(_{max}\))之间存在强烈的指数相关性,直接影响缸内温度,在所有配置中都观察到。由于氢气喷射产生的湍流动能增加,直喷装置的燃烧速度加快,从而导致缸内压力和温度升高。这种快速燃烧过程通过增加NO \(_x\)的形成使排放控制复杂化。尽管1孔和4孔自燃装置的燃烧性能和效率相似,但后者产生的NO \(_x\)排放量要高得多,这凸显了混合气均质化的关键作用。基于循环的分析进一步表明,DI配置,特别是4孔阀盖设计,会经历单周期NO排放峰值,这使得持续的排放控制更具挑战性。虽然PFI在减排和效率方面表现出明显的优势,但DI装置可以在更低的增压空气压力要求下提供相当的功率输出。然而,为了优化氢发动机的直喷策略,必须解决混合气形成方面的挑战。总体而言,该研究强调了优化混合物形成以减少氢发动机中NO \(_x\)排放的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fast-NO emission analysis of different mixture formation strategies in a hydrogen single-cylinder heavy-duty engine

This study investigates nitrogen oxide emissions (NO\(_x\)) in a heavy-duty hydrogen engine by comparing Port Fuel Injection (PFI) with two Direct Injection (DI) configurations under various load conditions. A fast chemiluminescence detector (CLD) enables cycle-resolved nitrogen monoxide emission (NO) measurements, providing detailed insights into the emission characteristics of each injection strategy. The findings reveal that the PFI configuration consistently results in the lowest NO\(_x\) emissions due to superior air–fuel mixture homogenization. Additionally, it exhibits minimal cycle-to-cycle variations in both pressure traces and NO emissions. The indicated efficiency of the PFI setup is also higher compared to DI, likely due to the higher charge air pressures required to maintain a constant air–fuel ratio and reduced wall-heat losses. Conversely, the DI configurations, especially the 4-hole cap design, produce significantly higher NO\(_x\) emissions and show considerable variability between cycles. A strong exponential correlation between NO emissions and peak cylinder pressure (p\(_{max}\)), which directly influences in-cylinder temperature, is observed across all configurations. The DI setups exhibit faster combustion, driven by increased turbulent kinetic energy from the hydrogen jet, leading to higher in-cylinder pressures and temperatures. This rapid combustion process complicates emission control by increasing NO\(_x\) formation. Despite similar combustion behavior and efficiency between the 1-hole and 4-hole DI setups, the latter generates much higher NO\(_x\) emissions, highlighting the crucial role of mixture homogenization. Cycle-based analysis further indicates that DI configurations, particularly the 4-hole cap design, experience single-cycle NO emissions spikes, making consistent emission control more challenging. While PFI presents clear advantages in emission reduction and efficiency, DI setups provide comparable power output with lower charge air pressure requirements. However, challenges in mixture formation must be addressed to optimize DI strategies for hydrogen engines. Overall, the study underscores the significance of optimizing mixture formation to mitigate NO\(_x\) emissions in hydrogen engines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信