布隆迪自给农业的非农收入和饮食多样性

IF 6.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Willy Désiré Emera, Carl Lachat, Yves Didier Umwungerimwiza, Wannes Slosse, Marijke D’Haese
{"title":"布隆迪自给农业的非农收入和饮食多样性","authors":"Willy Désiré Emera,&nbsp;Carl Lachat,&nbsp;Yves Didier Umwungerimwiza,&nbsp;Wannes Slosse,&nbsp;Marijke D’Haese","doi":"10.1007/s12571-025-01551-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The impact of agricultural decisions on the dietary diversity of people living on subsistence farms is poorly documented. This study examines the relationship between diversity in agricultural production and diets in two provinces of northern Burundi. The factors associated with the dietary diversity of women and children in these rural households were analysed using Poisson and probit models with six indicators of agricultural production diversity: (1) tropical livestock units, (2) animal count, (3) crop species count, (4) the Simpson’s index, (5) the Shannon index and (6) caloric content. We distinguish three groups of farms based on the proportion of agricultural products sold, i.e., \"subsistence farms” sold less than 5%, “quasi-subsistence farms” sold between 5 and 10%, and “farms with some sales” sold more than 10% of their produce. On average, women on subsistence farms consumed 4.0 out of ten food groups (standard deviation: 1.54), which is lower than the averages of 4.8 (standard deviation: 2.1) and 5.1 (standard deviation: 5.05) observed for women on quasi-subsistence farms and farms with some sales, respectively. The crops primarily sold in the three farming systems were bananas, coffee, and cassava. The consumption of vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, meat, poultry, and fish was low in all groups. No correlations were found between agricultural and dietary diversity. However, the likelihood of consuming animal-source foods was correlated with off-farm income. Subsistence farming households can provide basic food for the women and children of the family, yet require additional financial means to consume nutrient-dense foods available in markets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":"17 4","pages":"935 - 956"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12571-025-01551-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Off-farm income and dietary diversity in subsistence farming in Burundi\",\"authors\":\"Willy Désiré Emera,&nbsp;Carl Lachat,&nbsp;Yves Didier Umwungerimwiza,&nbsp;Wannes Slosse,&nbsp;Marijke D’Haese\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12571-025-01551-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The impact of agricultural decisions on the dietary diversity of people living on subsistence farms is poorly documented. This study examines the relationship between diversity in agricultural production and diets in two provinces of northern Burundi. The factors associated with the dietary diversity of women and children in these rural households were analysed using Poisson and probit models with six indicators of agricultural production diversity: (1) tropical livestock units, (2) animal count, (3) crop species count, (4) the Simpson’s index, (5) the Shannon index and (6) caloric content. We distinguish three groups of farms based on the proportion of agricultural products sold, i.e., \\\"subsistence farms” sold less than 5%, “quasi-subsistence farms” sold between 5 and 10%, and “farms with some sales” sold more than 10% of their produce. On average, women on subsistence farms consumed 4.0 out of ten food groups (standard deviation: 1.54), which is lower than the averages of 4.8 (standard deviation: 2.1) and 5.1 (standard deviation: 5.05) observed for women on quasi-subsistence farms and farms with some sales, respectively. The crops primarily sold in the three farming systems were bananas, coffee, and cassava. The consumption of vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, meat, poultry, and fish was low in all groups. No correlations were found between agricultural and dietary diversity. However, the likelihood of consuming animal-source foods was correlated with off-farm income. Subsistence farming households can provide basic food for the women and children of the family, yet require additional financial means to consume nutrient-dense foods available in markets.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Security\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"935 - 956\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12571-025-01551-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-025-01551-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-025-01551-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业决策对生活在自给农场的人的饮食多样性的影响鲜有文献记载。本研究考察了布隆迪北部两个省农业生产多样性与饮食之间的关系。采用泊松模型和probit模型,结合农业生产多样性的6个指标(1)热带牲畜数量、(2)动物数量、(3)作物种类数量、(4)辛普森指数、(5)香农指数和(6)热量含量),对这些农村家庭妇女和儿童饮食多样性的相关因素进行了分析。我们根据农产品销售比例将农场分为三组,即“自给农场”的销售额低于5%,“准自给农场”的销售额在5%至10%之间,“有一定销售额的农场”的销售额超过10%。平均而言,自给农场的妇女消费了10种食物中的4.0种(标准差:1.54),低于准自给农场和有一些销售的农场的妇女分别观察到的4.8种(标准差:2.1)和5.1种(标准差:5.05)的平均值。在这三种农业系统中,主要销售的作物是香蕉、咖啡和木薯。在所有人群中,富含维生素a的水果和蔬菜、肉类、家禽和鱼类的摄入量都很低。农业和膳食多样性之间没有相关性。然而,食用动物源性食品的可能性与非农收入相关。自给农业家庭可以为家庭的妇女和儿童提供基本食物,但需要额外的财政手段来消费市场上提供的营养丰富的食物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Off-farm income and dietary diversity in subsistence farming in Burundi

The impact of agricultural decisions on the dietary diversity of people living on subsistence farms is poorly documented. This study examines the relationship between diversity in agricultural production and diets in two provinces of northern Burundi. The factors associated with the dietary diversity of women and children in these rural households were analysed using Poisson and probit models with six indicators of agricultural production diversity: (1) tropical livestock units, (2) animal count, (3) crop species count, (4) the Simpson’s index, (5) the Shannon index and (6) caloric content. We distinguish three groups of farms based on the proportion of agricultural products sold, i.e., "subsistence farms” sold less than 5%, “quasi-subsistence farms” sold between 5 and 10%, and “farms with some sales” sold more than 10% of their produce. On average, women on subsistence farms consumed 4.0 out of ten food groups (standard deviation: 1.54), which is lower than the averages of 4.8 (standard deviation: 2.1) and 5.1 (standard deviation: 5.05) observed for women on quasi-subsistence farms and farms with some sales, respectively. The crops primarily sold in the three farming systems were bananas, coffee, and cassava. The consumption of vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, meat, poultry, and fish was low in all groups. No correlations were found between agricultural and dietary diversity. However, the likelihood of consuming animal-source foods was correlated with off-farm income. Subsistence farming households can provide basic food for the women and children of the family, yet require additional financial means to consume nutrient-dense foods available in markets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Security
Food Security FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
6.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches. Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet. From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas: Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition Global food potential and global food production Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs: § Climate, climate variability, and climate change § Desertification and flooding § Natural disasters § Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production § Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption. Nutrition, food quality and food safety. Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs: § Land, agricultural and food policy § International relations and trade § Access to food § Financial policy § Wars and ethnic unrest Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信