低配筋率混合钢筋混凝土梁的效率

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Chidchanok Pleesudjai, Carlos A. S. Oliveira, Daniel L. Araujo, Devansh Patel, Moacir Alexandre Souza de Andrade, Romildo Toledo Filho, Barzin Mobasher
{"title":"低配筋率混合钢筋混凝土梁的效率","authors":"Chidchanok Pleesudjai,&nbsp;Carlos A. S. Oliveira,&nbsp;Daniel L. Araujo,&nbsp;Devansh Patel,&nbsp;Moacir Alexandre Souza de Andrade,&nbsp;Romildo Toledo Filho,&nbsp;Barzin Mobasher","doi":"10.1617/s11527-025-02736-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research explores the serviceability level characterization of hybrid reinforced concrete (HRC) beams with low reinforcement ratios in the range of 0.052%-0.262% under flexural test. Hybrid reinforced structural members use continuous reinforcement with randomly distributed chopped fibers in the matrix. The study focuses on the immediate post-cracking response of flexural beams to analyze parameters such as stiffness, deflection, strain transfer mechanisms, and ultimate strength response. The influence of steel fibers on flexure performance, ductility, and tensile strain, as well as the sharing of the flexural load are also studied. HRC beams are shown to have a higher first crack strength (15–24%) and stiffness in the serviceability domain compared to conventional RC beams regardless of the reinforcement ratio. The addition of up to 1.25% fibers contributes to the sharing of the flexural load such that reducing longitudinal reinforcement between 50 and 80% was associated with decreasing the ultimate load between 10 and 50% while still increasing the post-crack stiffness. Crack localization was found in both RC and HRC sections within a range of reinforcement ratios. The addition of fiber while maintaining the same reinforcement ratio confirmed the reduction in ductility. However, by adopting a lower limit of 3.0 for the deflection ductility ratio, HRC beams with up to 0.75% of steel fibers were found to be ductile, even despite presented softening behavior after the peak load.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":691,"journal":{"name":"Materials and Structures","volume":"58 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of hybrid reinforced concrete beams with low reinforcement ratios\",\"authors\":\"Chidchanok Pleesudjai,&nbsp;Carlos A. S. Oliveira,&nbsp;Daniel L. Araujo,&nbsp;Devansh Patel,&nbsp;Moacir Alexandre Souza de Andrade,&nbsp;Romildo Toledo Filho,&nbsp;Barzin Mobasher\",\"doi\":\"10.1617/s11527-025-02736-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This research explores the serviceability level characterization of hybrid reinforced concrete (HRC) beams with low reinforcement ratios in the range of 0.052%-0.262% under flexural test. Hybrid reinforced structural members use continuous reinforcement with randomly distributed chopped fibers in the matrix. The study focuses on the immediate post-cracking response of flexural beams to analyze parameters such as stiffness, deflection, strain transfer mechanisms, and ultimate strength response. The influence of steel fibers on flexure performance, ductility, and tensile strain, as well as the sharing of the flexural load are also studied. HRC beams are shown to have a higher first crack strength (15–24%) and stiffness in the serviceability domain compared to conventional RC beams regardless of the reinforcement ratio. The addition of up to 1.25% fibers contributes to the sharing of the flexural load such that reducing longitudinal reinforcement between 50 and 80% was associated with decreasing the ultimate load between 10 and 50% while still increasing the post-crack stiffness. Crack localization was found in both RC and HRC sections within a range of reinforcement ratios. The addition of fiber while maintaining the same reinforcement ratio confirmed the reduction in ductility. However, by adopting a lower limit of 3.0 for the deflection ductility ratio, HRC beams with up to 0.75% of steel fibers were found to be ductile, even despite presented softening behavior after the peak load.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02736-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1617/s11527-025-02736-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了低配筋率0.052% ~ 0.262%的混合配筋混凝土(HRC)梁在抗弯试验下的使用水平表征。混合配筋结构构件采用连续配筋,在基体中随机分布短切纤维。研究重点是受弯梁的即时后开裂响应,分析刚度、挠度、应变传递机制和极限强度响应等参数。研究了钢纤维对混凝土抗弯性能、延性、拉伸应变以及抗弯荷载分担的影响。与传统RC梁相比,无论配筋率如何,HRC梁在可用性领域具有更高的首次裂缝强度(15-24%)和刚度。添加高达1.25%的纤维有助于分担弯曲荷载,因此减少50%至80%的纵向钢筋与减少10%至50%的极限荷载相关,同时仍增加了裂纹后刚度。在一定配筋率范围内,RC和HRC截面均存在裂纹局部化现象。在保持相同增强率的情况下添加纤维证实了延展性的降低。然而,采用3.0的挠曲延性比下限,即使在峰值荷载后出现软化行为,当钢纤维含量达到0.75%时,HRC梁仍具有延性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of hybrid reinforced concrete beams with low reinforcement ratios

This research explores the serviceability level characterization of hybrid reinforced concrete (HRC) beams with low reinforcement ratios in the range of 0.052%-0.262% under flexural test. Hybrid reinforced structural members use continuous reinforcement with randomly distributed chopped fibers in the matrix. The study focuses on the immediate post-cracking response of flexural beams to analyze parameters such as stiffness, deflection, strain transfer mechanisms, and ultimate strength response. The influence of steel fibers on flexure performance, ductility, and tensile strain, as well as the sharing of the flexural load are also studied. HRC beams are shown to have a higher first crack strength (15–24%) and stiffness in the serviceability domain compared to conventional RC beams regardless of the reinforcement ratio. The addition of up to 1.25% fibers contributes to the sharing of the flexural load such that reducing longitudinal reinforcement between 50 and 80% was associated with decreasing the ultimate load between 10 and 50% while still increasing the post-crack stiffness. Crack localization was found in both RC and HRC sections within a range of reinforcement ratios. The addition of fiber while maintaining the same reinforcement ratio confirmed the reduction in ductility. However, by adopting a lower limit of 3.0 for the deflection ductility ratio, HRC beams with up to 0.75% of steel fibers were found to be ductile, even despite presented softening behavior after the peak load.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materials and Structures
Materials and Structures 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
222
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: Materials and Structures, the flagship publication of the International Union of Laboratories and Experts in Construction Materials, Systems and Structures (RILEM), provides a unique international and interdisciplinary forum for new research findings on the performance of construction materials. A leader in cutting-edge research, the journal is dedicated to the publication of high quality papers examining the fundamental properties of building materials, their characterization and processing techniques, modeling, standardization of test methods, and the application of research results in building and civil engineering. Materials and Structures also publishes comprehensive reports prepared by the RILEM’s technical committees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信